Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T16:20:30.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic diversity and morpho-physiological assessment of drought tolerance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Sara Motallebinia*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Omid Sofalian
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Ali Asghari
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Ali Rasoulzadeh
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Bahram Fathi Achachlouei
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Sara Motallebinia; Email: sara.motallebi.nia@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Water deficit is one of the most important abiotic stresses constraining crop production in rapeseed. Understanding the mechanisms of adaptation to this stress is essential for the development and production of drought-tolerant genotypes. For this reason, this research study aims to investigate the importance of genetic diversity in identifying genotypes with a high degree of drought tolerance through assessing effectiveness of inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers on 14 genotypes of rapeseed in a factorial design. Morphological and physiological characteristics were studied after the early stages of growth; in order to evaluate the genetic diversity among genotypes, 18 different ISSR markers were used. A total of 106 clear and scalable loci were amplified, of which 60 bands (56.6%) were polymorphic. The highest polymorphism information content belonged to marker number 9 with the amount of 0.365 (85.7%). Gene variation ranged from 0.081 to 0.365 and the rapeseed genotypes were divided into three groups by cluster analysis (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean method). The analysis of molecular variance showed that 70% of the total variation was observed within populations and 30% of this variation occurred among populations. In addition, t-test was used for comparing oil content percentage among different genotypes in control and stress levels. Adriana had the highest amount of seed oil with 36.47%, whereas Karaj 2 had the lowest amount with 27.28 and Cooper had the highest decrease in oil content percentage under stress conditions. Overall, the genotypes Likord, Hyola 401 and Sarigol 32 were identified as the most drought-tolerant.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany
Figure 0

Table 1. Name, origin and growth types of oilseed rape genotypes

Figure 1

Table 2. Sequence and annealing temperature of ISSR primers

Figure 2

Figure 1. Grouping of canola genotypes based on the measured traits under control, first and second stress levels using the Ward method.

Figure 3

Table 3. ISSR primers and their indices

Figure 4

Table 4. Genetic diversity parameters based on ISSR markers

Figure 5

Figure 2. Grouping of canola genotypes based on ISSR data using Jacard similarity coefficient and UPGMA method.

Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 1

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 86.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 2

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 131.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 3

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 124.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 4

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 115.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 5

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 2.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 6

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 362 KB
Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 7

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 7(File)
File 649.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 8

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 8(File)
File 430.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 9

Motallebinia et al. supplementary material
Download Motallebinia et al. supplementary material 9(File)
File 87.7 KB