Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T04:58:08.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vortex separation and interaction in the wake of inclined trapezoidal plates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2015

Yuqi Huang
Affiliation:
Power Machinery and Vehicular Engineering Institute, Department of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaFluids Laboratory for Aeronautical and Industrial Research (FLAIR), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia
James Venning*
Affiliation:
Fluids Laboratory for Aeronautical and Industrial Research (FLAIR), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia
Mark C. Thompson
Affiliation:
Fluids Laboratory for Aeronautical and Industrial Research (FLAIR), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia
John Sheridan
Affiliation:
Fluids Laboratory for Aeronautical and Industrial Research (FLAIR), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: james.venning@gmail.com

Abstract

Full three-dimensional numerical simulations are employed to investigate the flows over inclined trapezoidal low-aspect-ratio plates at low Reynolds numbers, aiming to understand the unsteadiness induced by the interaction between the trailing vortical wake structures originating from the swept edges, and those from the leading and trailing edges. The flows past eighteen different plate geometries in three broad sets are simulated to study the influence of aspect ratio, taper angle and angle of attack on the wake vortices and the force coefficients. Both taper ratio and angle of attack of plates with the same area are found to have a broadly predictable influence on the wake stability and asymptotic forces. Smaller taper ratios result in lower maximum lift, while an increase in the angle of attack results in a reduction in the differences in maximum lift. Two distinct modes of periodic unsteady flow with significant differences in frequency are observed. The corresponding vortex-shedding mechanisms are analysed with the aid of $Q$ -criterion isosurfaces and streamlines. A low wake frequency is observed at small taper angles when there is relative independence between the von Kármán vortices originating from the leading and trailing edges, and weak swept-edge vortices. The dominant Strouhal number in this state is approximately 0.09. When the taper angle or angle of attack increases, the flows over the swept edges form stronger trailing vortex structures which interact strongly with the leading-edge vortices, combining to produce a regular stream of vortex loops shed into the wake. In this regime, the dominant Strouhal number increases to approximately 0.14–0.18. Higher Reynolds numbers and/or angles of attack result in a loss of centre plane reflection symmetry in the wake. The aerodynamic forces have been quantified as a function of the problem parameters and plate geometry.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1.(a) Three-dimensional view of the flow geometry showing the position of the plate within the computational domain. (b) Schematic showing key dimensions and parameters of the flow set-up. Only the $y{-}z$ domain cross-section is shown; this extends $L_{x}$ in the $x$ direction (into the page). (c) The plate geometry and dimensions.

Figure 1

Table 1.Model dimensions.

Figure 2

Figure 2.Force coefficient evolution comparisons for the grid-resolution/domain-size study. The solid black line represents mesh 1, the solid grey line represents mesh 2 and the dashed black line represents mesh 3: (a) lift coefficient, (b) drag coefficient.

Figure 3

Figure 3.Comparison of the spanwise vorticity field at midspan for the $AR=2$ rectangular plate at ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$ and $\mathit{Re}=100$ for (a) $t=1.5$ and (b) $t=7.5$. Left: experimental results from Taira & Colonius (2009) using DPIV; middle: simulations from Taira & Colonius (2009); right: simulations from the present study. It should be noted that both the colourmaps and contour levels are only approximately equivalent.

Figure 4

Figure 4.Comparison of the lift (a) and drag (b) predictions at $\mathit{Re}=100$ for an $AR=2$ rectangular plate with experimental and numerical results from Taira & Colonius (2009) as a function of angle of attack ${\it\alpha}$.

Figure 5

Figure 5.Comparisons with the simulations from Taira & Colonius (2009) for the forces on $AR=2$ (triangles) and 4 (squares) rectangular plates at $\mathit{Re}=300$. The filled symbols correspond to the current simulations and the open symbols to those of Taira & Colonius (2009): (a) maximum lift coefficient, (b) average lift coefficient at large times, (c) average drag coefficient at large times.

Figure 6

Figure 6.Time histories of force coefficients on flat plates of different taper ratios ($\mathit{TR}$) at $\mathit{Re}=500$ for a range of angles of attack. (a) Lift coefficient, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$. (b) Drag coefficient, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$. (c) Lift coefficient, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$. (d) Drag coefficient, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$.

Figure 7

Table 2.Result summary for plates with constant area.

Figure 8

Figure 7.Characteristic force behaviour of the constant-area trapezoidal plates at $\mathit{Re}=500$. The rectangular plate ($\mathit{TR}=0$) is plotted with hollow squares, $\mathit{TR}=0.2$ with circles, $\mathit{TR}=0.4$ with triangles, $\mathit{TR}=0.6$ with diamonds and $\mathit{TR}=0.8$ with filled squares: (a) Time-averaged lift coefficient at large times, (b) Time-averaged drag coefficient at large times, (c) maximum lift coefficient, (d) time-averaged lift-to-drag ratio at large times.

Figure 9

Figure 8.Characteristic times for the lift coefficient for different plates at various angles of attack. The rectangular plate ($\mathit{TR}=0$) is plotted with hollow squares, $\mathit{TR}=0.2$ with circles, $\mathit{TR}=0.4$ with triangles, $\mathit{TR}=0.6$ with diamonds and $\mathit{TR}=0.8$ with filled squares. (a) The time at which the lift is a maximum, $t^{\ast }$. (b) The time at which the lift becomes unsteady, $t_{m}$.

Figure 10

Figure 9.Top-down angled view of the isosurface of $Q=10$ coloured by streamwise vorticity to highlight the vortex structures in the wake of $\text{area}=1$ plates 1–6 at ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $\mathit{Re}=500$ and $t=70$: (a) $\mathit{TR}=0$; (b) $\mathit{TR}=0.2$; (c) $\mathit{TR}=0.4$; (d) $\mathit{TR}=0.6$; (e) $\mathit{TR}=0.8$; (f) $\mathit{TR}=1$. These structures are similar to those observed from a sphere.

Figure 11

Figure 10.Lift coefficients for flow over $AR=2$ flat plates at $\mathit{Re}=300$. (a) Here, ${\it\Lambda}=0^{\circ }$, 10°, 20°, 30° and 40° at ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$. (b) Periodic flows: ${\it\Lambda}=0^{\circ }$ at ${\it\alpha}=25^{\circ }$; ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, 20°at ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$; ${\it\Lambda}=30^{\circ }$, 40° at ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$. (c) Long-time lift variation for ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$. (d) Long-time lift variation for ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$.

Figure 12

Figure 11.Top row: top-down angled view of the isosurface for $Q=10$ coloured by streamwise vorticity behind an $AR=2$ trapezoidal plate at ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$ and $\mathit{Re}=300$. Bottom row: corresponding spanwise vorticity plots in the centre plane showing the leading-edge shedding that is associated with the observed lift coefficient variation. The surfaces correspond to the times marked in figure 10(c): (a) $t_{1}$; (b) $t_{2}$; (c) $t_{3}$; (d) $t_{4}$.

Figure 13

Table 3.Result summary for plates with the same aspect ratio ($AR=2,\mathit{Re}=300$).

Figure 14

Table 4.Result summary for plates with the same aspect ratio ($AR=2,\mathit{Re}=500$).

Figure 15

Figure 12.Isosurfaces of $Q=10$ together with streamlines over the $AR=2$ rectangular plate at two times corresponding to a peak and a trough in the lift signal at $\mathit{Re}=300$: (a) isosurface for ${\it\Lambda}=0^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak, (b) isosurface for ${\it\Lambda}=0^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough, (c) streamlines, $C_{L}$ peak, (d) streamlines, $C_{L}$ trough.

Figure 16

Figure 13.Isosurfaces of $Q=10$ showing the flow structure behind different $AR=2$ trapezoidal plates at different inclinations at $\mathit{Re}=300$. The images correspond to either peaks or troughs in the lift trace: (a) ${\it\Lambda}=30^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (b) ${\it\Lambda}=30^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough; (c) ${\it\Lambda}=40^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (d) ${\it\Lambda}=40^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough.

Figure 17

Figure 14.Streamlines over $AR=2$ trapezoidal plates with the same taper angle at different angles of attack, at the times corresponding to the peak lift and troughs, at $\mathit{Re}=300$: (a) ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (b) ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough; (c) ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (d) ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough; (e) ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (f) ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough; (g) ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (h) ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough.

Figure 18

Figure 15.Streamlines over $AR=2$ trapezoidal plates at ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, at the times corresponding to the peak lift and troughs, at $\mathit{Re}=300$: (a) ${\it\Lambda}=30^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (b) ${\it\Lambda}=30^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough; (c) ${\it\Lambda}=40^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (d) ${\it\Lambda}=40^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough.

Figure 19

Figure 16.The side view of the streamlines over $AR=2$ trapezoidal plates, at times corresponding to the peak lift and troughs, at $\mathit{Re}=300$: (a) ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (b) ${\it\Lambda}=10^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough; (c) ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (d) ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough; (e) ${\it\Lambda}=30^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (f) ${\it\Lambda}=30^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough; (g) ${\it\Lambda}=40^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ peak; (h) ${\it\Lambda}=40^{\circ }$, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, $C_{L}$ trough.

Figure 20

Figure 17.Isosurfaces of $Q=10$ coloured by streamwise vorticity for the trapezoidal plates with ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$ at a range of angles of attack. Here, $AR=4$, $\mathit{Re}=300$: (a) Lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, (b) Lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, (c) Lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, (d) Lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, (e) Lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, (f) Lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$.

Figure 21

Table 5.Result summary for plates with the same aspect ratio ($AR=4,\mathit{Re}=300$).

Figure 22

Figure 18.Cross-stream view showing coloured contours of spanwise vorticity with overlaid streamlines in a plane $0.75c$ downstream from the midpoint of the plate. The geometry is a trapezoidal plate with ${\it\Lambda}=20^{\circ }$. Here, $AR=4$, $\mathit{Re}=300$: (a) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, (b) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, (c) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, (d) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, (e) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, (f) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$.

Figure 23

Figure 19.Isosurfaces coloured by streamwise vorticity for the trapezoidal plates with ${\it\Lambda}=50^{\circ }$ at a range of angles of attack. Here, $AR=4$, $\mathit{Re}=300$. The isosurfaces are extracted for $Q=4$ in (a,d) and $Q=10$ in (b,c,e,f): (a) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, (b) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, (c) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, (d) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, (e) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, (f) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$.

Figure 24

Figure 20.Cross-stream view showing coloured contours of spanwise vorticity with overlaid streamlines in a plane $0.75c$ downstream from the midpoint of the plate. The geometry is a trapezoidal plate with ${\it\Lambda}=50^{\circ }$, $AR=4$, $\mathit{Re}=300$: (a) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, (b) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, (c) lift peak, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$, (d) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, (e) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, (f) lift trough, ${\it\alpha}=40^{\circ }$.

Figure 25

Figure 21.Isosurface of $Q=10$ for an $AR=4$ trapezoidal plate with ${\it\Lambda}=20$, ${\it\alpha}=40$, at $\mathit{Re}=500$, clearly showing loss of wake symmetry.

Figure 26

Figure 22.The power spectral density of lift traces on the plates of $AR=2$, $\mathit{Re}=300$.

Figure 27

Figure 23.The power spectral density of lift traces on the plates of $AR=4$, ${\it\alpha}=20^{\circ }$, $\mathit{Re}=300$.

Figure 28

Figure 24.The power spectral density of lift traces on the plates of $AR=4$, ${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, $\mathit{Re}=300$.

Figure 29

Figure 25.The power spectral density of lift traces on the trapezoidal plates of $AR=4$, ${\it\Lambda}=50^{\circ }$${\it\alpha}=30^{\circ }$, $\mathit{Re}=300$. (a) Lift trace. (b) Power spectral density of the lift traces.

Figure 30

Figure 26.Wake state as a function of taper angle (${\it\Lambda}$) and angle of attack (${\it\alpha}$) for trapezoidal plates. The reference parameter map (b) shows the wake state (steady, open symbols; periodic, half-filled symbols; aperiodic, filled symbols) for fixed $\mathit{Re}=300$ and $AR=2$. The transition boundaries are only approximate. The parameter map (a) shows the effect of increasing the Reynolds number from $\mathit{Re}=300$ to 500, and (c) shows the effect of changing the aspect ratio from $AR=2$ to 4.