Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T12:30:20.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of changing culture medium on preimplantation embryo development in rabbit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2021

Haixia Wang ,
Wenbin Cao ,
Huizhong Hu ,
Chenglong Zhou ,
Ziyi Wang ,
Naqash Alam ,
Pengxiang Qu Open the ORCID record for Pengxiang Qu [Opens in a new window]  and
Enqi Liu
Haixia Wang
Affiliation:
Qinghai Drug Purchasing Center, Xining, Qinghai Province, China Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Wenbin Cao
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Huizhong Hu
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Chenglong Zhou
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Ziyi Wang
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Naqash Alam
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Pengxiang Qu*
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Enqi Liu*
Affiliation:
Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
*
Authors for correspondence: Dr Pengxiang Qu and Professor Liu Enqi, Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, No. 76 Yanta West Road, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. E-mail: qupengxiang@xjtu.edu.cn and liuenqi@xjtu.edu.cn
Authors for correspondence: Dr Pengxiang Qu and Professor Liu Enqi, Laboratory Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, No. 76 Yanta West Road, Xi’an, 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. E-mail: qupengxiang@xjtu.edu.cn and liuenqi@xjtu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Many studies have focused on the optimization of the composition of embryo culture medium; however, there are few studies involving the effect of a culture medium changing procedure on the preimplantation development of embryos. In this study, three groups were designed: a non-renewal group, a renewal group and a half-renewal group. The levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), apoptotic index, blastocyst ratio and blastocyst total cell number were analyzed in each group. The results showed that the ROS level and the apoptotic index of blastocyst in the non-renewal group were significantly higher than in the renewal group and the half-renewal group (P < 0.05). The blastocyst ratio and blastocyst total cell number were significantly higher in the half-renewal group than that in non-renewal group and the renewal group (P < 0.05). These results demonstrated that the procedure of changing the culture medium influenced ROS level, apoptotic index, blastocyst ratio and total cell number of blastocysts. In addition, the result suggested that changing the culture medium may lead to a loss of important regulatory factors for embryos, while not changing the culture medium may lead to the accumulation of toxic substances. Half-renewal can alleviate the defects of both no renewal and renewal, and benefit embryo development. This study will be of high value as a reference for the optimization of embryo culture in vitro, and is very significant for assisted reproduction.

Keywords

ApoptosisCulture mediumDevelopmentEmbryoRabbitReactive oxygen species

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 338 - 343
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Infertility is increasingly acknowledged as a global public health issue by the World Health Organization, and a growing number of couples currently worry or have previously worried about infertility (De Neubourg et al., Reference De Neubourg, van Duijnhoven, Nelen and D’Hooghe2012; Barratt et al., Reference Barratt, Björndahl, De Jonge, Lamb, Osorio Martini, McLachlan, Oates, van der Poel, St John, Sigman, Sokol and Tournaye2017). Since the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) baby was born in 1978, more than 5 million IVF babies have been born worldwide, and the number is increasing exponentially (Faddy et al., Reference Faddy, Gosden and Gosden2018). Embryo culture is a crucial step for IVF and other assisted reproduction techniques, and the embryo culture medium has a wide influence on embryo development in terms of metabolism, morphology, epigenetic conditions, gene expression and developmental ability (Mani and Mainigi, Reference Mani and Mainigi2018). It has been reported that IVF babies have a higher risk of cancer, metabolic diseases, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases, and this may be closely related to in vitro culture (Simonstein et al., Reference Simonstein, Mashiach-Eizenberg, Revel and Younis2014).

Many kinds of embryo culture medium are at this time available for humans and animals (Rossi et al., Reference Rossi, Di Nisio, Macchiarelli, Nottola, Halvaei, De Santis and Cecconi2019). Most research has focused on optimizing the composition of the culture medium, and only a few studies have tackled the culture medium changing procedure (de los Santos et al., Reference de Los Santos, Gámiz, de Los Santos, Romero, Prados, Alonso, Remohí and Dominguez2015). Studies have shown that in vitro cultured embryos can secrete some important factors into the medium that play an important role in regulating their development (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Lee, Kim and Jun2016; Lin et al., Reference Lin, Beckers, McCafferty, Gansemans, Szymanska, Pavani, Catani, Van Nieuwerburgh, Deforce, De Sutter, Van Soom and Peelman2019). At the same time, embryo metabolites or degradation products of the culture medium will produce some substances that are harmful to the embryo cultured in vitro (Shohael et al., Reference Shohael, Ali, Yu, Hahn, Islam and Paek2006). Renewal of the embryo culture medium may lead to the loss of some important secretions, while non-renewal of the embryo culture medium may lead to the accumulation of toxic substances.

Rabbits play an important role in reproductive biology (Fischer et al., Reference Fischer, Chavatte-Palmer, Viebahn, Navarrete Santos and Duranthon2012). Many pioneering achievements in reproductive biology come from research using rabbits (Alexandre Reference Alexandre2001; Fischer et al., Reference Fischer, Chavatte-Palmer, Viebahn, Navarrete Santos and Duranthon2012). In this study, the rabbit was used as a model to study the effect of changing the culture medium on embryo development in vitro, and our work will provide an important reference for the optimization of embryo culture.

Materials and methods

Animal

Here, 6–8-month-old rabbits were raised individually in cages at the Laboratory Animal Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University with unrestricted access to food and water. The temperature was maintained at c. 25°C, and the day:night ratio was 12 h:12 h. All procedures involved in the animal experiments were in line with animal ethics and welfare requirements to minimize animal suffering.

Collection of fertilized eggs

Here, 80 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG; Shusheng, Ningbo, China) was injected subcutaneously, then hCG (SHUSHENG, Ningbo, China) 100 IU was injected intravenously 72 h later, and the female rabbits were immediately mated with male rabbits. At 20–22 h after mating, the female rabbits were anaesthetised, and the abdominal cavity was opened to separate the fallopian tube. A syringe loaded with 2 ml of Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) containing 5% fetal bovine serum was inserted into the fallopian tube near the uterine segment, and the end of the fallopian tube near the ovary was placed in a centrifuge tube. Then the plunger of the syringe was pressed down to flush out the fertilized eggs. The fertilized eggs were collected under a stereomicroscope and transferred into DPBS containing hyaluronidase (5 mg/l).

In vitro culture

The fertilized embryos were treated with DPBS containing hyaluronidase for 5 min at 38.5°C, and then blown gently to remove the granulosa cells from the embryos. The embryos were then transferred into embryo culture medium covered with oil. The formula of the embryo culture medium is shown in Table 1. The amount of culture medium in each culture dish was 400 µl, the number of embryos in each dish was 40, and the culture environment was maintained at 38.5°C, at saturated humidity and with 5% CO2. Three groups were designated, a non-renewal group, a renewal group, and a half-renewal group. In the non-renewal group, embryo culture medium was not changed from day 1 to day 4. In the renewal group, embryo culture medium was completely changed on day 3. In the half-renewal group, 200 µl of old culture medium was drawn out on day 3, and replaced with 200 µl fresh culture medium.

Table 1.

Composition of embryo culture medium

ROS staining

Embryos were incubated for 20 min in serum-free medium containing 10 mM 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCHF-DA) at 37°C. Then the embryos were washed three times in serum-free medium, and examined and photographed using a Nikon Eclipse TI-s microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and analyzed using Image Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD).

Apoptosis staining

A terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used to analyze the apoptosis of blastocysts. Embryos were washed three times with 0.2% PBS-polyvinyl alcohol (PBS-PVA) for 5 min each time, and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature (RT) for 30 min. Embryos were washed three times with 0.2% PBS-PVA for 5 min each time. The washed embryos were then equilibrated in E-buffer for 5–8 min, and then transferred to apoptotic dye solution containing 45 μl E-buffer, 5 μl nucleotide mix and 1 μl rTDT at 37°C for 1 h. The reaction was terminated by applying saline–sodium citrate (SSC) buffer for 15 min, and the embryos were washed three times with 0.2% PBS-PVA. Embryos were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 3 min, then the embryos were washed three times with 0.2% PBS-PVA. Next the embryos were transferred to a glass slide, pressed and covered with glass, and sealed with nail polish. Samples were examined and photographed under a Nikon Eclipse TI-s microscope (Nikon), and analyzed using Image Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Counting total number of cells in blastocysts

Blastocysts were treated with DPBS containing hyaluronidase to remove the granulosa cells. Then the blastocysts were washed three times with 0.2% PBS-PVA for 5 min each time, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at RT for 30 min. The blastocysts were treated with DAPI for 3 min, and then were washed three times with 0.2% PBS-PVA. After transfer onto a glass slide and being pressed with a coverslip, the blastocysts were examined and photographed under a Nikon Eclipse TI-s microscope (Nikon), and counted using Image Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics).

Statistical analysis

SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Blastocyst rate was analyzed using the chi-squared test. The relative level of ROS, apoptotic index of blastocysts, and blastocyst total cell number were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Each experiment was repeated more than three times.

Results

Effect of changing the culture medium on the ROS level of blastocysts

Embryos in the non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups were cultured for 4 days, and the relative level of ROS of the blastocysts was analyzed using DCHF-DA. The result showed that the ROS level of blastocysts in the non-renewal group was significantly higher than in the renewal group and the half-renewal group (P < 0.05), and that there was no significant difference between the renewal group and the half-renewal group (P > 0.05; Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Relative level of ROS in blastocysts in the non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. (A) ROS staining in blastocysts. Upper row: bright field; middle row: green fluorescence indicating ROS; lower row: merged bright field and green fluorescence. (B) Quantification of ROS fluorescence intensity. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Effect of changing the culture medium on the apoptotic index of blastocysts

On day 4 blastocysts were collected and analyzed using a TUNEL kit in each group. The apoptotic index was defined as the number of apoptotic cells divided by the blastocyst total cell number. The result showed that the apoptotic index of blastocysts in the non-renewal group was significantly higher than in the renewal group and the half-renewal group (P < 0.05), and that the difference between the renewal group and the half-renewal group was not significant (P > 0.05; Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Apoptosis index of blastocysts in the non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. (A) TUNEL assay of apoptotic blastomeres. Upper row: DAPI; middle row: green fluorescence indicating apoptotic cells; bottom row: merged DAPI and apoptotic cell. (B) Apoptosis index of blastocysts. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Effect of changing the culture medium on the blastocyst ratio and blastocyst total cell number

The blastocyst ratio and the blastocyst total cell number in each group were analyzed on day 4. The results showed that the blastocyst ratio (Fig. 3A) and blastocyst total cell number (Fig. 3B) were significantly higher in the half-renewal group than in the non-renewal group and the renewal group. The blastocyst ratio and the blastocyst total cell number in the non-renewal group and the renewal group showed no significant difference (P < 0.05).

Figure 3.

Blastocyst ratio and blastocyst total cell number in non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. (A) Blastocyst ratio on day 4 in non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. (B) Total cell number of blastocysts in non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Discussion

Much progress has been made in the optimization of embryo culture medium, and two different approaches exist to embryo culture: one attitude is ‘let the embryo choose’, the other is ‘return to nature’ (Koscinski et al., Reference Koscinski, Merten, Kazdar and Guéant2018). Guided by the first tactic, culture medium’ formula was determined by experience, experiment and algorithm analysis, allowing the culture medium to support all nutrient requirements from the zygote to the blastocyst stage (Thouas et al., Reference Thouas, Jones and Trounson2003). For example, KSOM medium was developed based on this idea and has been successfully used in mice, rabbits and cattle (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Foote and Yang1995; Jin et al., Reference Jin, Kim, Im and Choi2000; Zhu et al., Reference Zhu, Walker and Maddocks2004; Men et al., Reference Men, Stone and Bryda2020). Under the guidance of ‘return to nature’, culture medium was synthesized by defining the different nutrients required at different stages of embryonic development, simulating the components of oviduct fluid or uterine fluid in vivo (Qu et al., Reference Qu, Wang, Zhang and Liu2020a). In the zygote and the first few cleavage stages, the metabolic activity of the embryo is relatively weak (Pantaleon et al., Reference Pantaleon, Ryan, Gil and Kaye2001). With the activation of the embryo’s genome, the embryo migrates from the fallopian tube to the uterus, and during this process, the metabolism of the embryo gradually increases (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Wang, Chen, Qi, Baker, Liu, Zhang and Han2020). G1/G2 culture media were designed based on this. G1 culture medium was used at the first few cleavages, and then embryos were transferred into G2 culture medium according to the changes of embryonic development and nutritional requirements (Hall-Woods et al., Reference Hall-Woods, Krisher, Lane, Gardner and Asa2000; Sanches et al., Reference Sanches, Pontes, Basso, Ferreira, Perecin and Seneda2013). For KSOM medium, there was no need to renew the culture medium, but for G1/G2 culture medium, renewal of the culture medium was necessary.

During its development, the embryo is in close contact with the microenvironment of the embryo culture medium or oviduct fluid (Sekirina and Neganova, Reference Sekirina and Neganova1995; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Lee, Lee, Park, Elahi, Lee, Park, Hyun and Lee2017; Chen and Schoen, Reference Chen and Schoen2019). Renewal of the culture medium may lead to the loss of these important factors, which is not conducive to embryonic development. conversely, with increasing duration of the culture, some nutrients will be consumed, and toxic substances will accumulate as a result of decomposition or metabolism (Kleijkers et al., Reference Kleijkers, van Montfoort, Bekers, Coonen, Derhaag, Evers and Dumoulin2016). In this study, three groups were designed: a non-renewal group, a renewal group and a half-renewal group. The ROS level, apoptotic index, embryonic development-related genes, blastocyst ratio and blastocyst total cell number were analyzed to study the effect of changing the culture medium on preimplantation embryos.

Previous studies have reported that the ROS level of embryos in vitro is higher than that of embryos developed in vivo (Amoushahi et al., Reference Amoushahi, Salehnia and Ghorbanmehr2018; An et al., Reference An, Peng, Cheng, Lu, Zhou, Zhang and Su2019; Qu et al., Reference Qu, Luo, Du, Zhang, Song, Yuan, Lin, Li and Liu2020b). Excessive ROS levels could damage lipid, protein and DNA, disturb gene expression, and block embryo development (Takahashi, Reference Takahashi2012; Alarifi et al., Reference Alarifi, Ali, Verma, Almajhdi and Al-Qahtani2014). At appropriate concentrations, ROS can be used as a signal molecule participating in the regulation of the cell cycle, cell differentiation and development (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Zhu, Zheng, Chai, Ji, Ren, Liu, Liu, Song, Li, Liu and Li2017). Treating the embryo in vitro with antioxidants, such as melatonin and glutathione, can effectively reduce ROS level and improve the ability of embryos to develop in vitro (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Pang, Hao, Du, Zhao and Zhu2018; Li et al., Reference Li, Gu, Lu, Zhao, Feng and Sun2018; Pang et al., Reference Pang, Jiang, Wang, Wang, Hao, Zhao, Du, Zhao, Wang and Zhu2019; Hicks et al., Reference Hicks, Mentler, Arena, Current and Whitaker2020). In this study, the ROS level of blastocysts was significantly higher in the non-renewal group than in the renewal group and the half-renewal group, and there was no significant difference between the renewal group and the half-renewal group. Previous studies have reported that the concentration of ammonia in the culture medium increased with culture time, which led to an increase of the embryonic ROS level (Kleijkers et al., Reference Kleijkers, van Montfoort, Bekers, Coonen, Derhaag, Evers and Dumoulin2016). The results indicated that oxides may accumulate in the culture medium during embryo culture, and the oxides might be removed or diluted by renewing culture medium, which could decrease the ROS level of the embryo.

In the process of embryonic development, many factors can lead to apoptosis (Qu et al., Reference Qu, Wang, Zhang and Liu2020a). The apoptotic ratio of blastocysts was significantly increased under endoplasmic reticulum stress or heat stress (Lin et al., Reference Lin, Lee, Oqani, Kim, Cho, Jeong, Baek and Jin2016). In a hyperoxic environment, embryos showed a higher apoptotic ratio than in a hypoxic environment (Lin et al., Reference Lin, Lee, Oqani, Kim, Cho, Jeong, Baek and Jin2016). Pesticides and other toxicants increased the apoptotic ratio and caused embryonic malformation (Jia et al., Reference Jia, Ding, Shen, Luo, Zhang, Zhou, Ding, Qu and Liu2019). There is a close relationship between the apoptotic ratio and embryonic development potential, and a higher apoptotic ratio is considered to have a lower developmental potential (Jia et al., Reference Jia, Ding, Shen, Luo, Zhang, Zhou, Ding, Qu and Liu2019). Adding antioxidants or anti-stress compounds to the culture medium can effectively reduce the apoptotic ratio and enhance the development of the embryo in vitro (Lin et al., Reference Lin, Lee, Oqani, Kim, Cho, Jeong, Baek and Jin2016). In this study, we found that the apoptotic ratio of blastocysts was significantly higher in the non-renewal group than in the renewal group and the half-renewal group, and that the difference between the renewal group and the half-renewal group was not significant, indicating that non-renewal of embryo medium may not be conducive to embryonic development, while changing the culture medium influenced the apoptosis of embryos in vitro.

The blastocyst ratio and blastocyst total cell number are important indexes to evaluate embryo development. Studies have shown that embryos with a higher blastocyst ratio and blastocyst total cell number have higher developmental potential (Jia et al., Reference Jia, Ding, Shen, Luo, Zhang, Zhou, Ding, Qu and Liu2019). In this study, the blastocyst ratio and the blastocyst total cell number in the half-renewal group were significantly higher than those in the renewal group and the non-renewal group. This further confirms our hypothesis that changing the culture medium may lead to the loss of important regulatory factors for embryos, while not changing the culture medium may lead to the accumulation of toxic substances, which are both not conducive to embryonic development. Half-renewal can alleviate the defects of non-renewal or renewal, and benefit embryo development.

In conclusion, we found that the culture medium changing procedure could affect the level of ROS, the apoptotic index of blastocysts, the development rate of blastocysts and the blastocyst total cell number. This study has a high value as reference for the optimization of embryo culture in vitro, and has important significance for assisted reproduction.

Financial support

This work was supported by a project funded by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under grant no. 2020TQ0240 and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province under grant no. 2020PT-001 and grant no. 2021PT-039.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

Ethical standards

The Animal Care and Use Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University approved all animal use procedures applied in this study.

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Alarifi, S, Ali, D, Verma, A, Almajhdi, FN and Al-Qahtani, AA (2014). Single-walled carbon nanotubes induce cytotoxicity and DNA damage via reactive oxygen species in human hepatocarcinoma cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 50, 714–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexandre, H (2001). A history of mammalian embryological research. Int J Dev Biol 45, 457–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Amoushahi, M, Salehnia, M and Ghorbanmehr, N (2018). The mitochondrial DNA copy number, cytochrome c oxidase activity and reactive oxygen species level in metaphase II oocytes obtained from in vitro culture of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in comparison with in vivo-obtained oocyte. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 44, 1937–46.Google ScholarPubMed
An, QL, Peng, W, Cheng, YY, Lu, ZZ, Zhou, C, Zhang, Y and Su, JM (2019). Melatonin supplementation during in vitro maturation of oocyte enhances subsequent development of bovine cloned embryos. J Cell Physiol 234, 17370–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barratt, CLR, Björndahl, L, De Jonge, CJ, Lamb, DJ, Osorio Martini, FO, McLachlan, R, Oates, RD, van der Poel, S, St John, B, Sigman, M, Sokol, R and Tournaye, H (2017). The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 23, 660–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S and Schoen, J (2019). Air–liquid interface cell culture: from airway epithelium to the female reproductive tract. Reprod Domest Anim 54 Supplement 3, 38–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Neubourg, D, van Duijnhoven, NTL, Nelen, WLDM and D’Hooghe, TM (2012). Dutch translation of the ICMART-WHO revised glossary on ART terminology. Gynecol Obstet Invest 74, 233–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faddy, MJ, Gosden, MD and Gosden, RG (2018). A demographic projection of the contribution of assisted reproductive technologies to world population growth. Reprod Biomed Online 36, 455–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, B, Chavatte-Palmer, P, Viebahn, C, Navarrete Santos, AN and Duranthon, V (2012). Rabbit as a reproductive model for human health. Reproduction 144, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall-Woods, ML, Krisher, RL, Lane, M, Gardner, DK and Asa, CS (2000). Comparison of Gardner’s G1/G2 sequential media and buffalo rat liver (BRL) cell go-culture for bovine in-vitro embryo production. Biol Reprod 62, 316.Google Scholar
Hicks, E, Mentler, M, Arena, HA, Current, JZ and Whitaker, BD (2020). Cyanidin improves oocyte maturation and the in vitro production of pig embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 56, 577–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, ZQ, Pang, YW, Hao, HS, Du, WH, Zhao, XM and Zhu, HB (2018). Effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on bovine oocytes matured in vitro . Asian Australas J Anim Sci 31, 1420–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, LY, Ding, B, Shen, C, Luo, SW, Zhang, YR, Zhou, L, Ding, RK, Qu, PX and Liu, EQ (2019). Use of oocytes selected by brilliant cresyl blue staining enhances rabbit cloned embryo development in vitro . Zygote 27, 166–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, DI, Kim, DK, Im, KS and Choi, WS (2000). Successful pregnancy after transfer of rabbit blastocysts grown in vitro from single-cell zygotes. Theriogenology 54, 1109–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Los Santos, MJ, Gámiz, P, de Los Santos, JM, Romero, JL, Prados, N, Alonso, C, Remohí, J and Dominguez, F (2015). The metabolomic profile of spent culture media from Day-3 human embryos cultured under low oxygen tension. PLoS One 10, e0142724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J, Lee, J, Kim, SH and Jun, JH (2016). Coculture of preimplantation embryos with outgrowth embryos improves embryonic developmental competence in mice. Reprod Sci 23, 913–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleijkers, SHM, van Montfoort, APA, Bekers, O, Coonen, E, Derhaag, JG, Evers, JLH and Dumoulin, JCM (2016). Ammonium accumulation in commercially available embryo culture media and protein supplements during storage at 2-8°C and during incubation at 37°C. Hum Reprod 31, 1192–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koscinski, I, Merten, M, Kazdar, N and Guéant, JL (2018). Culture conditions for gametes and embryos: which culture medium? Which impact on newborn? Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 46, 474–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, J, Lee, H, Lee, Y, Park, B, Elahi, F, Lee, ST, Park, CK, Hyun, SH and Lee, E (2017). In vitro oocyte maturation in a medium containing reduced sodium chloride improves the developmental competence of pig oocytes after parthenogenesis and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev 29, 1625–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, ZC, Gu, RH, Lu, XW, Zhao, S, Feng, Y and Sun, YJ (2018). Preincubation with glutathione ethyl ester improves the developmental competence of vitrified mouse oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 35, 1169–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, T, Lee, JE, Oqani, RK, Kim, SY, Cho, ES, Jeong, YD, Baek, JJ and Jin, DI (2016). Tauroursodeoxycholic acid improves pre-implantation development of porcine SCNT embryo by endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibition. Reprod Biol 16, 269–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, XY, Beckers, E, McCafferty, S, Gansemans, Y, Szymanska, KJ, Pavani, KC, Catani, JP, Van Nieuwerburgh, F, Deforce, D, De Sutter, P, Van Soom, A and Peelman, L (2019). Bovine embryo-secreted microRNA-30c is a potential non-invasive biomarker for hampered preimplantation developmental competence. Front Genet 10, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Z, Foote, RH and Yang, X (1995). Development of early bovine embryos in co-culture with KSOM and taurine, superoxide dismutase or insulin. Theriogenology 44, 741–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mani, S and Mainigi, M (2018). Embryo culture conditions and the epigenome. Seminars in Reprod Med 36, 211–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Men, H, Stone, BJ and Bryda, EC (2020). Media optimization to promote rat embryonic development to the blastocyst stage in vitro . Theriogenology 151, 81–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, YW, Jiang, XL, Wang, YC, Wang, YY, Hao, HS, Zhao, SJ, Du, WH, Zhao, XM, Wang, L and Zhu, HB (2019). Melatonin protects against paraquat-induced damage during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes. J Pineal Res 66, e12532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pantaleon, M, Ryan, JP, Gil, M and Kaye, PL (2001). An unusual subcellular localization of GLUT1 and link with metabolism in oocytes and preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 64, 1247–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qu, P, Wang, Y, Zhang, C and Liu, E (2020a). Insights into the roles of sperm in animal cloning. Stem Cell Res Ther 11, 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qu, PX, Luo, SW, Du, Y, Zhang, YR, Song, XJ, Yuan, XT, Lin, ZJ, Li, YH and Liu, EQ (2020b). Extracellular vesicles and melatonin benefit embryonic develop by regulating reactive oxygen species and 5-methylcytosine. J Pineal Res 68, e12635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, G, Di Nisio, V, Macchiarelli, G, Nottola, S A, Halvaei, I, De Santis, L and Cecconi, S (2019). Technologies for the production of fertilizable mammalian oocytes. Appl Sci 9, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanches, BV, Pontes, JHF, Basso, AC, Ferreira, CR, Perecin, F and Seneda, MM (2013). Comparison of synthetic oviductal fluid and G1/G2 medium under Low-1 oxygen atmosphere on embryo production and pregnancy rates in Nelore (Bos indicus) cattle. Reprod Domest Anim 48, e7–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekirina, GG and Neganova, IE (1995). The microenvironment created by non-blocking embryos in aggregates may rescue blocking embryos via cell-embryo adherent contacts. Zygote 3, 313–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shohael, AM, Ali, MB, Yu, KW, Hahn, EJ, Islam, R and Paek, KY (2006). Effect of light on oxidative stress, secondary metabolites and induction of antioxidant enzymes in Eleutherococcus senticosus somatic embryos in bioreactor. Process Biochem 41, 1179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonstein, F, Mashiach-Eizenberg, M, Revel, A and Younis, JS (2014). Assisted reproduction policies in Israel: a retrospective analysis of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 102, 1301–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, M (2012). Oxidative stress and redox regulation on in vitro development of mammalian embryos. J Reprod Dev 58, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thouas, GA, Jones, GM and Trounson, AO (2003). The ‘GO’ system – a novel method of microculture for in vitro development of mouse zygotes to the blastocyst stage. Reproduction 126, 161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B, Zhu, W, Zheng, Z, Chai, R, Ji, S, Ren, G, Liu, T, Liu, Z, Song, T, Li, F, Liu, S and Li, G (2017). Fluctuation of ROS regulates proliferation and mediates inhibition of migration by reducing the interaction between DLC1 and CAV-1 in breast cancer cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 53, 354–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y, Wang, LQ, Chen, C, Qi, HB, Baker, PN, Liu, XQ, Zhang, H and Han, TL (2020). Metabolic changes of maternal uterine fluid, uterus, and plasma during the peri-implantation period of early pregnancy in mice. Reprod Sci 27, 488–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, BK, Walker, SK and Maddocks, S (2004). Optimisation of in vitro culture conditions in B6CBF1 mouse embryos. Reprod Nutr Dev 44, 219–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Composition of embryo culture medium

Figure 1

Figure 1. Relative level of ROS in blastocysts in the non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. (A) ROS staining in blastocysts. Upper row: bright field; middle row: green fluorescence indicating ROS; lower row: merged bright field and green fluorescence. (B) Quantification of ROS fluorescence intensity. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Apoptosis index of blastocysts in the non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. (A) TUNEL assay of apoptotic blastomeres. Upper row: DAPI; middle row: green fluorescence indicating apoptotic cells; bottom row: merged DAPI and apoptotic cell. (B) Apoptosis index of blastocysts. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Blastocyst ratio and blastocyst total cell number in non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. (A) Blastocyst ratio on day 4 in non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. (B) Total cell number of blastocysts in non-renewal, renewal and half-renewal groups. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).