Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:51:55.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulation of pyroshock environment and effect rules of shock response spectrum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2023

W. Wang
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China The Key Laboratory of Fluid and Matter Interaction, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
K. Huang
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
F. Zhao*
Affiliation:
National Center for Materials Service Safety, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: zhaofei@ustb.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The high-frequency and high-amplitude pyroshock environment during the service of the spacecraft will cause damage to the equipment. Here, we develop a shock test device based on air cannon to simulate the above pyroshock environment. Then, a finite element model was established by explicit dynamic software ANSYS/LS-DYNA, and the simulation results were proved to be consistent with the test data. Based on the theory of Shock Response Spectrum (SRS), the effects of device parameters such as pressure, bullet material and resonant plate material on SRS were investigated via numerical simulation and shock test. This study shows that the amplitude of SRS increases with the increase of pressure in the range of 0.15–0.60 MPa, and the break frequency amplitude has a square root function relationship with the pressure. Additionally, the high-frequency amplitude of SRS was affected by the energy transfer efficiency of the bullet.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Air cannon device.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the simulation device.

Figure 2

Table 1. Part parameters

Figure 3

Figure 3. Standard SRS.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The mass-spring-damper system.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Finite element model.

Figure 6

Figure 6. SRSs of different grid numbers.

Figure 7

Figure 7. SRSs of different pressures.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Fitting relationship curve of break frequency amplitudes and bullet velocity.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Fitting relationship curve of break frequency amplitudes and pressure.

Figure 10

Figure 10. SRSs of different bullet lengths.

Figure 11

Figure 11. SRSs of different bullet materials.

Figure 12

Table 2. Material parameters of bullet

Figure 13

Figure 12. Bullet energy change curves.

Figure 14

Figure 13. SRSs of different densities of bullets.

Figure 15

Figure 14. SRSs of different resonator plate thicknesses.

Figure 16

Table 3. SRS parameters of resonator plates with different thicknesses

Figure 17

Figure 15. SRSs of resonator plate with different materials.

Figure 18

Table 4. Material parameters

Figure 19

Figure 16. Shock test device.

Figure 20

Figure 17. Accelerometer installation.

Figure 21

Figure 18. Three curves of (a) acceleration histories and (b) shock response spectrum.

Figure 22

Figure 19. SRSs of different pressures.

Figure 23

Figure 20. Comparison of numerical and test results.

Figure 24

Figure 21. Fitting relationship curve of (a) break frequency amplitude and the bullet velocity and (b) break frequency amplitude and the pressure.

Figure 25

Figure 22. SRSs of different length bullets.

Figure 26

Figure 23. SRSs of different material bullets.