Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T20:25:12.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding the impact of Hib conjugate vaccine on transmission, immunity and disease in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2007

J. McVERNON*
Affiliation:
Population Biology of Infectious Disease Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, UK Immunisation Department, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, UK Vaccine & Immunisation Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute & School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
M. E. RAMSAY
Affiliation:
Immunisation Department, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, UK
A. R. McLEAN
Affiliation:
Population Biology of Infectious Disease Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr J. McVernon, Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute & School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Level 5, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia. (Email: mcvernon@unimelb.edu.au)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A rise in invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) infections occurred 8 years after vaccine introduction in the United Kingdom. Aspects of Hib vaccine delivery unique to the United Kingdom have been implicated. The authors developed a fully age-structured deterministic susceptible–infected–resistant–susceptible mathematical model, expressed as a set of partial differential equations, to better understand the causes of declining vaccine effectiveness. We also investigated the consequences of the vaccine's impact on reducing Hib transmission for maintenance of immunity. Our findings emphasized the importance of maintaining high post-immunization antibody titres among age groups at greatest risk of invasive infections. In keeping with UK population-based estimates, low direct efficacy of immunological memory against disease was found, cautioning against over-reliance on evidence of priming alone as a correlate of population protection. The contribution of herd immunity to disease control was reinforced. Possible intervention strategies will be explored in subsequent work.

Information

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Age-structured model. (a) Unvaccinated proportion. Mutually exclusive compartments represent the different epidemiological status of individuals in the population in relation to the infection. Arrows describe flows between these compartments. Individuals are born immunologically naive (N), until they acquire their first Hib infection (F). Following clearance of colonization, individuals seroconvert and move to the high antibody (AH) compartment. This state denotes a period of absolute resistance to reacquisition of infection. Over time, immunity wanes and individuals move into the low antibody (AL) category. Here the presence of low-level measurable immunity provides incomplete protection against infection. With the waning of antibody from low to undetectable levels, individuals are once again fully susceptible to acquisition (S). Infections acquired in the presence of low (IL) or no detectable (IN) circulating antibody are assumed to have a reduced likelihood of progressing to invasive disease compared with the first infection (F). With clearance of carriage from either the IL or IN state, immunity is stimulated to the protective (AH) level and the cycle of waning immunity, re-infection and stimulation of immunity begins again. (b) Vaccinated proportion. Immediately following primary vaccination, individuals enter the model with high (AHV), low (ALV) or undetectable (SV) antibody levels. This bypassing of the immunologically naive (N) state removes the risk of progression to invasive disease associated with the first ever infection (F) which is experienced by the unvaccinated group. The proportion in each immune category at the outset depends on the immunogenicity of vaccines in use at any given time. The degree of protection against acquisition in these three states is assumed to be identical to that experienced by unvaccinated individuals with high (AH), low (AL) or undetectable (S) immunity. As before, infections may arise in the face of low or unmeasurable antibody, in this instance denoted as ILV and INV respectively. The same risks of progression to invasive disease are assumed as from the IL and IN conditions. Following recovery from infection, immunity is boosted to a higher level than would be seen in an unvaccinated population (BV). From here, antibodies wane to the post-immunization level (AHV), with this additional step making the duration of protection following an episode of natural exposure longer in individuals who have been vaccinated. With waning of immunity, the cycle of reacquisition and boosting of antibody levels can recur.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Best fit of the ODE model used for parameter estimation to: (a) Hib carriage prevalence in the United States by age, 1976 (error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of population estimates). (b) Hib antibody titres <1·0 μg/ml in English children by age, 1990–1991 (error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of population estimates). (c) Hib antibody titres <0·15 μg/ml in English children by age, 1990–1991 (error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of population estimates).

Figure 2

Table. Summary of parameter values

Figure 3

Fig. 3. PDE model fit to English data following vaccine introduction in October 1992 at 2, 3 and 4 months (error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of observed data). (a) Prevalence of Hib antibody titres ⩾1·0 μg/ml. (b) Prevalence of Hib antibody titres <0·15 μg/ml. (c) Hib carriage prevalence in children attending nurseries, England and Wales. □, Observed; –◆–, model.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Observed (□) and model (–◆–) predicted invasive Hib incidence by age and year, 1991–2002.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Effects of vaccine scheduling and immunogenicity on all infections in the population by age group and time (vaccine introduction at t=5 years). (a) Introduction of infant immunization alone. (b) Vaccine introduction accompanied by catch-up campaign. (c) Initial catch-up campaign, use of poorly immunogenic vaccine in years t=12 and t=13 (corresponding to 2000 and 2001).

Supplementary material: File

McVernon Supplementary Material

Appendices.doc

Download McVernon Supplementary Material(File)
File 162.8 KB