Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:21:30.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses, A Symposium on Michael Rosen's The Shadow of God: Kant, Hegel, and the Passage from Heaven to History – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2023

Michael Rosen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Correction
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 85 , Special Issue 4: Part II of The Crowd in the History of Political Thought: A Symposium on Populism , Fall 2023, pp. 602
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Notre Dame

This articleFootnote 1 omits three in-text citations, which should have read as follows:

Pages 571–572: “The short answer to one of Keum's perceptive questions—why talk about doxai?—is, as she rightly notes, that doxa is meant to be ‘a deliberately expansive term’ (562–63).”

Page 574: “I call this “Socratism” and it seems to me pretty much what Taylor himself means by ‘the eruption of radical criticism into human history’ (568).

The picture that Taylor gives is that moral progress is based on the erosion of particularisms: the emergence of an idea of a universal good, giving ‘a standpoint outside the existing society from which it could be criticized’ (567).”

The publisher apologizes for these errors.

Footnotes

1 Rosen, M. (2023). Author's Response. The Review of Politics, 571–575. doi:10.1017/S0034670523000335