Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:20:27.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subsurface scientific exploration of extraterrestrial environments (MINAR 5): analogue science, technology and education in the Boulby Mine, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2018

Charles S. Cockell*
Affiliation:
UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
John Holt
Affiliation:
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Jim Campbell
Affiliation:
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Harrison Groseman
Affiliation:
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Jean-Luc Josset
Affiliation:
Space Exploration Institute, Neuchatel, Switzerland
Tomaso R. R. Bontognali
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Audra Phelps
Affiliation:
Spaceward Bound, NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA
Lilit Hakobyan
Affiliation:
Spaceward Bound, NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA
Libby Kuretn
Affiliation:
Spaceward Bound, NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA
Annalea Beattie
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
Jen Blank
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA
Rosalba Bonaccorsi
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA SETI Institute's Carl Sagan Center, California, USA
Christopher McKay
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA
Anushree Shirvastava
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA
Carol Stoker
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA
David Willson
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, California, USA
Scott McLaughlin
Affiliation:
UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
Sam Payler
Affiliation:
UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
Adam Stevens
Affiliation:
UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
Jennifer Wadsworth
Affiliation:
UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
Loredana Bessone
Affiliation:
European Astronaut Center, European Space Agency, Cologne, Germany
Matthias Maurer
Affiliation:
European Astronaut Center, European Space Agency, Cologne, Germany
Francesco Sauro
Affiliation:
University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Javier Martin-Torres
Affiliation:
UK Centre for Astrobiology, SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra (UGR-CSIC), Granada, Spain
Maria-Paz Zorzano
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), Torrejon de Ardoz, 28850 Madrid, Spain
Anshuman Bhardwaj
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
Alvaro Soria-Salinas
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
Thasshwin Mathanlal
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
Miracle Israel Nazarious
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
Abhilash Vakkada Ramachandran
Affiliation:
Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
Parag Vaishampayan
Affiliation:
Biotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
Lisa Guan
Affiliation:
Biotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
Scott M. Perl
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology/NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA Mineral Sciences, Los Angeles Natural History Museum, Pasadena, California, USA
Jon Telling
Affiliation:
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
Ian M. Boothroyd
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Newcastle, UK
Ollie Tyson
Affiliation:
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
James Realff
Affiliation:
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
Joseph Rowbottom
Affiliation:
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
Boris Laurent
Affiliation:
University of Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, UK
Matt Gunn
Affiliation:
University of Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, UK
Shaily Shah
Affiliation:
Kalam Center, New Delhi, India
Srijan Singh
Affiliation:
Kalam Center, New Delhi, India
Sean Paling
Affiliation:
Boulby Underground Laboratory, Boulby, UK
Tom Edwards
Affiliation:
Boulby Underground Laboratory, Boulby, UK
Louise Yeoman
Affiliation:
Boulby Underground Laboratory, Boulby, UK
Emma Meehan
Affiliation:
Boulby Underground Laboratory, Boulby, UK
Christopher Toth
Affiliation:
Boulby Underground Laboratory, Boulby, UK
Paul Scovell
Affiliation:
Boulby Underground Laboratory, Boulby, UK
Barbara Suckling
Affiliation:
Boulby Underground Laboratory, Boulby, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Charles S. Cockell, E-mail: c.s.cockell@ed.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The deep subsurface of other planetary bodies is of special interest for robotic and human exploration. The subsurface provides access to planetary interior processes, thus yielding insights into planetary formation and evolution. On Mars, the subsurface might harbour the most habitable conditions. In the context of human exploration, the subsurface can provide refugia for habitation from extreme surface conditions. We describe the fifth Mine Analogue Research (MINAR 5) programme at 1 km depth in the Boulby Mine, UK in collaboration with Spaceward Bound NASA and the Kalam Centre, India, to test instruments and methods for the robotic and human exploration of deep environments on the Moon and Mars. The geological context in Permian evaporites provides an analogue to evaporitic materials on other planetary bodies such as Mars. A wide range of sample acquisition instruments (NASA drills, Small Planetary Impulse Tool (SPLIT) robotic hammer, universal sampling bags), analytical instruments (Raman spectroscopy, Close-Up Imager, Minion DNA sequencing technology, methane stable isotope analysis, biomolecule and metabolic life detection instruments) and environmental monitoring equipment (passive air particle sampler, particle detectors and environmental monitoring equipment) was deployed in an integrated campaign. Investigations included studying the geochemical signatures of chloride and sulphate evaporitic minerals, testing methods for life detection and planetary protection around human-tended operations, and investigations on the radiation environment of the deep subsurface. The MINAR analogue activity occurs in an active mine, showing how the development of space exploration technology can be used to contribute to addressing immediate Earth-based challenges. During the campaign, in collaboration with European Space Agency (ESA), MINAR was used for astronaut familiarization with future exploration tools and techniques. The campaign was used to develop primary and secondary school and primary to secondary transition curriculum materials on-site during the campaign which was focused on a classroom extra vehicular activity simulation.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Surface image of Boulby Mine, (b) location of Boulby Mine, (c) the inside of the Boulby Underground Laboratory, (d) schematic of the Boulby Underground Science Laboratory and Mars Yard.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Sites where samples were acquired and studied during MINAR 5 in relation to the underground laboratory and mine roadways (top). The ‘Lab’ constitutes the underground laboratory and Mars Yard (see Fig. 1). Depths below sea level are shown. (a) Polygons experimental area. The dark lineations of the polygons can be seen in the wall behind the sampling team. (b) Brine sampling experimental area. ESA astronaut Matthias Maurer samples brine solutions at the edge of the pool.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. A flow chart showing the sequence of sample analysis in MINAR 5 to emulate robotic or human exploration studies on other planetary surfaces.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Some of the sample acquisition instrumentation deployed in MINAR 5. (a)–(c) NASA drill. (a) The Hilti Drill TE 50, 1050 Watts; (b) 42 cm core string; 40.6 cm cutting string; 92.7 cm cuttings string; (c) core drill bit diameter 5 and 7 cm long, (d) The SPLIT instrument in operation on an artificial outcrop of halite in the Mars Yard; (e) the use of MINAR for the methodical development of the SPLIT technology (see ‘Results’ section for details).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Some of the analytical instrumentation deployed in MINAR 5. (a) Close-Up Imager (CLUPI) (seen as the camera on the tripod, top left), (b) UV fluorescence spectrometer (showing schematic of instrument set-up on left and image of instrument on right), (c) Raman spectrometer (showing schematic of instrument set-up on left and image of instrument on right), (d) Minion DNA sequencer, (e) ATP/LAL analysis (LAL lab-on-a-chip top left and bottom left, ATP luminometer on right), (f) Metabolt.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Some environmental analysis equipment deployed in MINAR 5. (a) HABIT and Perpetual Environmental Station (PES), (b) PACKMAN and PES.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Drilling into Permian halite. (a) and (b) Drilling into salt polygon boundary junction (darker coloured strip) using the NASA Mars IceBreaker drill and core string.

Figure 7

Table 1. The use of MINAR campaigns to advance SPLIT development

Figure 8

Fig. 8. The Universal Planetary Sampling Bag. (a) Diagrammatic concept of bag. (b) A prototype bag. (c)—(f) Sequence of images showing use of bag prototype. (c) Bag is opened using perforated flanges that remain attached to bag. (d) Internal flaps allow for grabbing motion within the bag to obtain sample. (e) Sample is acquired and pulled into bag. (f) Sample inside bag with flanges wrapped down to seal bag. One-way air valve (bottom left) used to remove excess air. (g) An example prototype bag that uses a glove attachment inside for sample grabbing (see text for discussion).

Figure 9

Table 2. Problems with conventional Whirl-Pak™ sampling bags for field exploration solved with the Universal Planetary Sampling Bag

Figure 10

Fig. 9. CLUPI images of key evaporite materials in Boulby. (a) and (b) halite, (c) potash, (d) polyhalite, (e) material at the edges of a NASA drill hole through polygon material, (f) secondary NaCl mineralization near the edges of a brine seep.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. UV fluorescence spectroscopy. (a)–(c) Images of halite, potash and polyhalite obtained under 280 and 365 nm illumination, at room temperature. (d) Spectra obtained of the three samples for a 365 illumination at room temperature.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Raman spectroscopy. Spectral plots of (a) halite, (b) iron oxide/clay inclusions in potash, (c) polyhalite.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. (a) Concentration distribution of LPS. Error bars are the %CV for each duplicate assay. Samples are as follows: first nine samples are solid salt samples of polyhalite, halite and potash. Following three samples (‘polyg 2–3’) are samples from polygons in polygons experimental area. Following 19 samples are evaporite (‘wht evap’), salt stalagmite (‘stalag’) and brine samples (‘brine’) from brine sampling experimental area. (b) ATP in ancient and modern evaporite/brine system using selected samples in (a) including a sample from the ground at the laboratory entrance (far right).

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Metabolt operation. (a) Comparison of electrical conductivity in samples with and without glucose. (b) Comparison of redox potential (Eh) in samples with and without glucose. (c) Comparison of change in carbon dioxide levels in samples with and without glucose; (inset) anti-correlation with oxygen levels.

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Methane concentrations, sampled in the atmosphere within 13 locations in the Boulby Mine tunnels, plotted against their respective δ13C-CH4 values. The simplest explanation for the range of values is mixing between a thermogenic source and an atmospheric (ambient surface derived air) source. The value for the atmosphere endmember is taken from Whiticar (1999).

Figure 16

Fig. 15. Raw data of methane concentration (12C) within mine atmosphere samples (flat topped peaks) and gases extracted from the two potash samples (two highest peaks on right-hand side of plot), as measured by the Picarro G2201-i cavity ring down spectrometer. No methane was detected within the other suites of mineral samples tested (halite, polyhalite).

Figure 17

Fig. 16. 3D mapping. (a) Close range 3D mapping image done in the Boulby Mine with a rock sample. (b) Long range 3D mapping of the wall of the mine shaft. The small box on the bottom right of the image is the PACKMAN instrument.

Figure 18

Fig. 17. PACKMAN operation. Figure showing the lower background radiation experienced in Boulby Mine (dots) compared with surface particle flux (solid line), validating the instrument in a ‘quiet’ radiation environment.