Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:25:21.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and expression of polytopic construct of cathepsin-L1, SAP-2 and FhTP16.5 proteins of Fasciola hepatica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2020

S. Aghamolaei
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
B. Kazemi
Affiliation:
Cellular & Molecular Biology Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
M. Bandehpour
Affiliation:
Cellular & Molecular Biology Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
M.M. Ranjbar
Affiliation:
Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
S. Rouhani
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
A. Javadi Mamaghani
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
S.J.S. Tabaei*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: S.J.S. Tabaei, E-mail: seyyedtabaei@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique can play an important role in the early detection of fascioliasis. However, they have some diagnostic limitations, including cross-reaction with other helminths. It seems that the combination of recombinant parasite proteins as antigen can reduce these problems. Hence, the present study was aimed to design and confirm the antigenic recombinant multi-epitope (rMEP) construct of three protein epitopes (linear and conformational B-cell epitopes) of the parasite using immunoinformatic tools. For this purpose, the tertiary structures of Fasciola hepatica cathepsin-L1, saposin-like protein 2 and 16.5-kDa tegument-associated protein were predicted using the I-TASSER server. Validation of the modelled structures was performed by Ramachandran plots. The antigenic epitopes of the proteins were achieved by analysing the features of the IEDB server. The synthesized gene was cloned into the pET-22b (+) expression vector and transformed into the Escherichia coli BL21. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to verify and analyse the expression of the rMEP protein. Western blotting was utilized to confirm rMEP protein immunogenicity in two forms, one using an anti-His tag antibody and the other with human pooled sera samples (fascioliasis, non-fascioliasis and negative control sera). Our results demonstrated that the rMEP designed for the three proteins of F. hepatica was highly antigenic, and immune-detection techniques confirmed the antigen specificity. In conclusion, the presented antigenic multi-epitope may be very helpful to develop serodiagnostic kits such as indirect ELISA to evaluate the proper diagnosis of fascioliasis in humans and ruminants.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020
Figure 0

Table 1. The secondary structure, transmembrane topology and signal peptide of CL1, SAP-2 and 16.5 kDa proteins.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Prediction of secondary structure of the proteins using the SOPMA server: (a) CL1; (b) SAP-2; (c) 16.5 kDa protein.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. 3D structure of Fasciola hepatica proteins using the I-TASSER server: (a) CL1; (b) SAP-2; (c) 16.5 kDa protein.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Ramachandran modelling structure for the predicted model using the PROCHECK server: (a) CL1; (b) SAP-2; (c) 16.5 kDa protein.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Prediction of CL1, SAP-2 and 16.5 kDa proteins and B-cell epitope using the IEDB server: (a, g, m) BepiPred linear epitope; (b, h, n) Chou and Fasman β-turn; (c, i, o) Emini surface accessibility; (d, j, p) Kolaskar and Tongaonkar antigenicity; (e, k, q) Karplus and Schulz flexibility; (f, l, r) Parker hydrophilicity.

Figure 5

Table 2. Prediction of B-cell epitopes using ABCpred, LBtope, CBTope and IEDB for CL1protein.

Figure 6

Table 3. Prediction of B-cell epitopes by ABCpred, LBtope, CBTope and IEDB for SAP-2 protein.

Figure 7

Table 4. Prediction of B-cell epitopes using ABCpred, LBtope, CBTope and IEDB for 16.5 kDa protein.

Figure 8

Table 5. The six epitopes of amino acid sequence for CL1, SAP-2 and 16.5 kDa of Fasciola hepatica proteins.

Figure 9

Fig. 5. (a) Design of multi-epitope structure for CL1, SAP-2 and 16.5 kDa proteins of Fasciola hepatica; (b) the 3D structure model prediction of a multi-epitope sequence; (c) recognition of the parts of CL1, SAP-2 and 16.5 kDa epitopes on the 3D structure model of the multi-epitope.

Figure 10

Fig. 6. SDS-PAGE analysis of the expressed rMEP-pET-22b (+) polytope in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Lane 1: intact E. coli BL21; lanes 2 and 3: induced intact E. coli BL21; lane 4: BL21 with pET-22b (+); lanes 5 and 6: induced BL21 containing pET-22b (+); lane M: protein marker (240 kDa) (SMOBIO, Taiwan); lane 7: BL21 containing rMEP-pET-22b (+); lanes 8–11: induced BL21 including rMEP-pET-22b (+).

Figure 11

Fig. 7. Immunoblotting of the recombinant MEP-pET-22b (+) of Fasciola hepatica and Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) as negative control sample using anti-His tag antibody (lanes 1 and lane 2). M, protein marker (SMOBIO, Taiwan).

Figure 12

Fig. 8. Immunoblotting of purified recombinant multi-epitope peptide of Fasciola hepatica with sera from fascioliasis and non-fascioliasis patients and healthy controls. (a) Pooled sera from fascioliasis patients (lane 1), protein marker (SMOBIO, Taiwan) (lane 2); (b) pooled sera from healthy controls (lane 1), pooled sera from non-fascioliasis patients (lanes 2–6).