Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T09:04:47.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of Arctic sea-ice thickness by submarine 5 years after Scicex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Nicholas E. Hughes
Affiliation:
Scottish Association for Marine Science, Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK, E-mail: nick.hughes@sams.ac.uk
Peter Wadhams
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UKLaboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, BP 28, 06234 Villefranche-sur-Mer Cedex, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In April 2004 the Royal Navy submarine HMS Tireless became the first UK submarine to conduct environmental monitoring in the Arctic Ocean since 1996. As the last US SCICEX (Scientific Ice Expeditions) cruise was in 2000, this has been the only opportunity for a civilian scientist to carry out measurement of ice draft and oceanography over a wide area of the Arctic. This paper presents preliminary results and compares them with similar investigations in the 1970s–90s. The route of Tireless covered a large area of the European sector of the Arctic from 5˚E to 62˚W. Transects were carried out from the marginal ice zone in Fram Strait up to the North Pole and along the 85˚N parallel north of Greenland. As part of work for the European Commission IRIS project, image intensity from the advanced synthetic aperture radar instrument on the European Space Agency’s Envisat satellite has been compared with ice draft from the submarine. The raw data were found to be highly variable, so a moving average was applied, producing a correlation of 0.79. Tireless carried a full oceanographic sensor suite and expendable probes for investigation into changes in the Arctic Ocean. The results from these show further erosion of the Arctic cold halocline layer by advancing Atlantic Water compared to previous climatologies and fieldwork expeditions. Preliminary ice-draft data from 85˚N show deeper ice keels than those encountered by a submarine on the same route in 1987.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2006 
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Submarine tracks: 1976 (red), 1987 (green) and 2004 (blue). The 2000m isobath is also shown as a thin solid line.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Coincident single polarity Envisat ASAR scene acquired at 19:47:34 UTC on 1 April 2004. The submarine track is marked in red, with position at time of image acquisition marked by a yellow cross-hair. Averaged drift of ice features over 12 hours before and after the time of image acquisition are marked with the blue arrows (to scale). Converted to velocities, for points A and B this was 0.22 ms–1 followed by 0.11 ms–1. For points C–F, drift was 0.19 ms–1 followed by 0.082 ms–1. Position of the tracked feature at the time of acquisition is shown by a blue circle.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Envisat ASAR image intensity values vs ice draft from 1 April scene pixels.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Cross-correlation between ice draft and Envisat image intensity. The raw 15 m resolution data show very little correlation. Application of a 250 m moving average produces a high correlation of 0.79 at a lag of +270 m.

Figure 4

Fig. 5.East–west profile along 85˚N showing maximum keel depth, depth of the 0˚C isotherm (Atlantic Water) and bathymetry from the observation log of Tireless. Previous measurements along this line are also shown including maximum keel depths from Superb 1987, and depth of 0˚C isotherm from Oden 1991.

Figure 5

Fig. 6.Depth of the 0˚C isotherm measured by Tireless compared with data from the EWG climatology (Timokhov and Tanis, 1997) showing decrease in thickness of the surface water layer.