Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T10:52:53.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time and motion evaluation of disinfection practices before and after a switch from a dilutable to a ready-to-use disinfectant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2026

Jennifer Cadnum
Affiliation:
Cleveland VA Medical Center
Amelia Milner
Affiliation:
Cleveland VA Medical Center
Samir Memic
Affiliation:
VA Medical Center
Curtis Donskey
Affiliation:
Cleveland VA Medical Center

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Background: Environmental services (EVS) programs may choose dilutable (i.e., concentrate diluted manually or with an automated dispensing system) or ready-to-use (RTU) disinfectant products. Dilutable products are less expensive but have greater potential for incorrect use. Methods: We conducted a time and motion evaluation of EVS cleaning and disinfection practices before and after a facility-wide switch from dilutable to RTU quaternary ammonium disinfectant products. Observations were completed to determine the time required to complete tasks and the appropriateness of product use (e.g., correct product, contact time). Personnel were graded using a standardized compliance scale (17-20, highly compliant; 14-16 moderately compliant; 10-13, needs improvement). Results: We conducted 40 total hours of observations of 8 EVS personnel before and 10 after the product substitution. Mean compliance scores increased from 14.3 to 18.2 after the substitution. Noncompliance when dilutable products were used was most often due to incorrect use of products, including inappropriate mixing of disinfectant products (e.g., dilutable quaternary ammonium plus sodium hypochlorite) and inadequate contact time. During post-discharge and daily cleaning before the substitution, activities other than cleaning and disinfection accounted for 50% and 55% of total EVS personnel time, respectively (Figure), with similar time distribution after the substitution. Conclusions: Switching from dilutable to RTU disinfectants improved compliance with recommended cleaning and disinfection practices. EVS personnel spend a substantial proportion of their time doing activities other than cleaning and disinfection.

Two pie charts showing time distribution of environmental services personnel during post-discharge and daily room cleaning.

Information

Type
Disinfection/Sterilization
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America