Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T02:48:49.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors influencing the aqueous electrochemical response of TiC–Ni3Al cermets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Zhila Memarrashidi
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
Kevin P. Plucknett*
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: kevin.plucknett@dal.ca

Abstract

The aqueous corrosion resistance of TiC–Ni3Al based cermets was examined with the specific aims of assessing the influence of both the raw materials and the test methods, using a 3.5 wt% NaCl containing solution. The effects of W contamination in the ceramic phase was investigated using a single-phase ceramic, with and without W, and with a stoichiometric intermetallic Ni3Al binder. The influence of the electrolyte O2 content was examined for TiC cermets with 30 vol% binder, for both the stoichiometric composition and sub-stoichiometric variants, containing either Zr and B (alloy IC50) or Zr, B and Cr (alloy IC221) additions. Electrochemical measurements were matched with chemical and microstructural analyses at various stages of oxidation, and the rate of material loss in combination with the corrosion mechanisms were identified. The effects of O2 concentration were most significant for the TiC based cermets with Ni3Al due to the diffusion controlled nature of the reaction.

Information

Type
Invited Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Representative SEM images obtained from polished surfaces of the various TiC–30 vol% Ni3Al-cermets. (a) TiC–Ni3Al sample prepared with TiC source powder containing W contamination, showing the core-rim structure in the carbide grains (BSE image with −50 V bias). (b) TiC–Ni3Al sample prepared using high purity TiC source powder, without W contamination (combined SE/BSE image). (c) TiC–IC50 prepared with TiC source powder containing W (combined SE/BSE image). (d) TiC–IC221 prepared with TiC source powder containing W (combined SE/BSE image).

Figure 1

TABLE I. Average EDS chemical analyses of the core and outer rim compositions for the TiC–Ni3Al cermets prepared with W containing TiC powder. Standard deviation error is shown in parentheses.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. Electrochemical responses for SPS densified TiC ceramics, prepared with the two TiC powders, in a 3.5 wt% NaCl electrolyte: (a) OCP, and (b) potentiodynamic polarization. (c) Potentiodynamic polarization curves obtained for the TiC–30 vol% Ni3Al cermets, with and without W contamination within the ceramic phase.

Figure 3

TABLE II. The result of potentiodynamic polarization analysis on single-phase, SPS densified TiC specimens, with and without W contamination.

Figure 4

TABLE III. Results of electrochemical analysis extracted from potentiodynamic polarization curves on TiC–Ni3Al cermets in 3.5 wt% NaCl electrolyte.

Figure 5

FIG. 3. SEM images obtained from surface of TiC–30 vol% Ni3Al, after polarization up to 1 V (versus SCE) in 3.5 wt% NaCl aqueous electrolyte: (a) using high purity TiC (combined SE/BSE image), and (b) with W contamination in the carbide phase (combined SE/BSE image).

Figure 6

FIG. 4. Average chemical compositions of the pre- and post-polarization surfaces of TiC–Ni3Al cermets with and without W contamination.

Figure 7

FIG. 5. SEM micrograph obtained from surface of TiC–Ni3Al (with W contamination) after polarization up to 0.5 V (versus SCE), highlighting the core/rim interface (arrowed) (combined SE/BSE image).

Figure 8

TABLE IV. The results of EDS point analysis on post corrosion surfaces of the TiC(W)–Ni3Al cermet, highlighting the composition of the inner rim for the core-rim structure.

Figure 9

FIG. 6. OCP curves obtained from TiC based cermets with 30 vol% Ni3Al-based inter metallic binder under: (a) de-aerated, and (b) aerated test conditions (held for 50 min). Potentiodynamic polarization curves obtained from TiC based cermets with 30 vol% Ni3Al-based intermetallic binder under: (c) de-aerated, and (d) aerated test conditions.

Figure 10

TABLE V. Mean corrosion parameters determined for the TiC based cermets with 30 vol% Ni3Al-based intermetallic binder under aerated de-aerated conditions.

Figure 11

FIG. 7. SEM micrographs obtained on the post-polarization surfaces of selected TiC based cermets under both aerated and de-aerated conditions, in 3.5 wt% NaCl: (a) TiC–Ni3Al aerated (combined SE/BSE image), (b) TiC–Ni3Al de-aerated (combined SE/BSE image), (c) TiC–IC50 aerated (combined SE/BSE image), (d) TiC–IC50 de-aerated (combined SE/BSE image), (e) TiC–IC221 aerated (combined BSE image with −50 V bias), and (f) TiC–IC221 de-aerated (combined SE/BSE image).

Figure 12

FIG. 8. Post corrosion EDS mapping on post-polarization surface of TiC–IC221 (de-aerated electrolyte).