Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:34:46.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A review on advancement in strategies for low-NOx hydrogen combustion with micromix technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2025

Sushant K. Bawne
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Agartala, Agartala, Tripura 799046, India
Prasun Chakraborti
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Agartala, Agartala, Tripura 799046, India
Paramvir Singh*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Agartala, Agartala, Tripura 799046, India
*
Corresponding author: Paramvir Singh; Email: param016@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Micromix combustion technology emerges as a promising solution to address challenges in achieving clean combustion, particularly for hydrogen utilisation. This review provides a critical analysis for the potential of micromixing by delving into its core principles, diverse applications and the factors influencing its performance. The paper focuses on injector design, flame stabilisation and NOx mitigation strategies within the micromixing framework. Key findings include innovative burner designs, optimised air distribution techniques and the crucial role of fuel properties, especially for hydrogen combustion. The review highlights significant reductions in NOx emissions achieved through micromix combustion technology. For instance, NOx emissions were lowered to 2.2 ppm at φ = 0.4, representing a 45% improvement compared to conventional design configurations. Furthermore, a reduction of 40% in NOx emissions compared to standard configurations was observed at an equivalence ratio of 0.65. The study also compares NOx emissions between hydrogen and its blended fuels, showing lower emissions for methane. By highlighting the importance of optimising fuel mixture formation and flame stability for various operating conditions, this review underscores the significance of micromix combustion for advancing sustainable combustion technologies with low NOx emissions and reduced chance of flashback in hydrogen combustion.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of from hydrogen production to utilisation. Reproduced with permission [24].

Figure 1

Figure 2. The factors promote NOx formation.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Methods and approaches for NOx reduction.

Figure 3

Figure 4. 2D view of the micromix combustion technology showing the jet in cross flow. Reproduced with permission [18].

Figure 4

Figure 5. Swirl multi-nozzle micromix combustor: (a) cross-sectional view of the combustor’s internal structure, (b) method of mixing fuel with oxidiser, (c) array of honeycomb nozzles, (d) components involved in the combustor assembly. Reproduced with permission [53].

Figure 5

Figure 6. Geometry scaling in the industrial burner and domestic burner showing the differences with respect to the reference geometry. Reproduced with permission [18].

Figure 6

Figure 7. Overview of the iterative optimisation process applied to Micromix combustor development. Reproduced with permission [36].

Figure 7

Figure 8. (a) NOx emissions across varying nozzle diameters (0.30 mm to 0.84 mm) and equivalence ratios. (b) Comparison of numerical and experimental NO/NOx emissions for the 0.84 mm injector test burner under atmospheric testing conditions. Reproduced with permission [36].

Figure 8

Figure 9. Three burner headends were exploring top and sectional view of jet spacing effects with respect to diameter for HE1, HE2 and HE3. Reproduced with permission [67].

Figure 9

Figure 10. Four distinct micromix nozzle configurations. Reproduced with permission [68].

Figure 10

Figure 11. (a) Pressure loss and air distribution uniformity by varying the front terminal face using a reducer structure and (b) through a diverging structure, Reproduced with permission [68].

Figure 11

Figure 12. Geometric details of the single-nozzle burner (left) and its combustion chamber and essential components (right). Reproduced with permission [69].

Figure 12

Figure 13. Relationship between global NOx concentrations and equivalence ratio (φ) and relative humidity (ϕ) for configurations with and without flow body (FB). Constant thermal load maintained at 0.8 kW. Reproduced with permission [69].

Figure 13

Figure 14. (a) Combustor arrangement. (b) Single-hydrogen setup. (c) Close-up of fuel injection section. (d) Cross-section showing fuel injection types. Reproduced with permission [39].

Figure 14

Figure 15. OH∗chem images for five cases (1–5) at φ = 0.66 (a–e), and at φ = 0.64, φ = 0.66, and φ = 0.68 for case 4 (f–h). Additionally, a 45° rotated image at γh = 0.60 and φ = 0.62 (i). Reproduced with permission [39].

Figure 15

Figure 16. Outline structure of single micromix nozzle. Reproduced with permission [70].

Figure 16

Figure 17. The diagrammatic flow domain. Reproduced with permission [73].

Figure 17

Table 1. Effect of injector design on the emissions and combustion characteristics

Figure 18

Figure 18. Micromix combustor: baseline (left) and 1.0 mm fuel orifice scaled version (right). Crosswise section through air gates scaled to 2:1. Reproduced with permission [76].

Figure 19

Figure 19. NOx emission trends relative to selected parameters. Reproduced with permission [76].

Figure 20

Table 2. Effect of air gate design

Figure 21

Figure 20. Investigation flow chart for blockage ratio and energy density variation. Reproduced with permission [80].

Figure 22

Figure 21. (a) Comparison of NOx emissions at 15% O2 across equivalence ratio φ in experimental and numerical investigations, including optical flame appearance of 90/10 SG; (b) numerical temperature distribution on a cross-section for φ = 0.4 for all three configurations. Reproduced with permission [80].

Figure 23

Table 3. Effect of blockage ratio for diffusion flame

Figure 24

Figure 22. Nozzle outlet velocity and flue gas recirculation ratio trends. Reproduced with permission [75].

Figure 25

Figure 23. NOx and CO emissions correlation with varying nozzle outlet velocity. Reproduced with permission [75].

Figure 26

Table 4. Effect of fuel energy density for diffusion flame

Figure 27

Figure 24. Experimental setup layout with main components depicted in (a) real view and (b) schematic view. Reproduced with permission [85].

Figure 28

Figure 25. CFD results for NOx formation rates. Reproduced with permission [85].

Figure 29

Table 5. Findings from the micromix combustion with different fuel blends

Figure 30

Figure 26. Changing the height of the AGP (air guiding panel) by adjusting the parameter k. Reproduced with permission [92].

Figure 31

Figure 27. Calculated temperature (bottom) and NO mass fraction (top) distributions for the burner variation K4 (x = 4 mm, Δk = 4 mm). Reproduced with permission [92].

Figure 32

Figure 28. NOx emissions relative to APU power output: (1) kerosene, (2) H2 nozzles, and (3) H2 micromix combustion chambers. Reproduced with permission [93].

Figure 33

Table 6. Effect of combustor geometry on gas turbine performance for diffusion flame

Figure 34

Figure 29. NO emission (a) experimental and computational outcomes across different values of ϕ and d; (b) experimental and computational outcomes across various D and d. Reproduced with permission [99].

Figure 35

Figure 30. The emissions of NO and the pathways of NO formation in micromix design across a range of equivalence ratios, specifically ϕ = 0.6 – 1.0. Reproduced with permission [99].

Figure 36

Table 7. Effect of equivalence ratio on combustion characteristics and mixing effects