Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T09:58:29.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multivariate analysis from maturase K (matK) gene-based markers and morphological indices in Indian cashew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2024

Suparna Das
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India
Md. Nasim Ali*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India
Sayani Bandyopadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India
Mini Poduval
Affiliation:
Department of Spices & Plantation Crops, Faculty of Horticulture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India
*
Corresponding author: Md. Nasim Ali; Email: nasimali2007@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The patterns and extent of genetic variation among 56 cashew germplasm with respect to 32 qualitative and 33 quantitative traits were evaluated for two successive years in the present study. Additionally, maturase K gene-based genetic diversity among those breeding materials was also assessed. The cashew hybrids were developed from five crosses (local parent × 2/9 Dicherla; H-2/15 × red hazari; WBDC-V × JGM-1; BLA-39-4 × H-2/15 and H-2/15 × yellow hazari) involving eight parents of Indian cashew. Different genotype groups (parents and their hybrids) showed significant variation in both the years of assessment based on quantitative characters. The highest Shannon–Weaver diversity (H′) was obtained for the colour of the young leaf (0.96), possibly indicating differential exposure to sunlight, mixing of various pigments and another set of chemicals such as phenolics, carotenoids, etc. in trees. From correlation studies, canopy spread, tree spread, nuts/m2 and nuts/panicle were found to be significantly and positively correlated with nut yield. In the year 2021, nuts/m2, area and tree height were the significant explanatory variables that explained 80% of the variation in the yield, whereas in 2022, nuts/m2, tree area, nuts/panicle, kernel weight, shell thickness, inflorescence breadth and sex ratio explained 86% of the variation. Principal component analysis indicated that the genotypes under study are diverse enough to be exploited for the future cashew improvement programmes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany
Figure 0

Table 1. Information on parents

Figure 1

Figure 1. Variability in cashew genotypes: tree habit (a), leaf shape (b), number of leaves per twig (c) and leaf apex (d).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Variability in cashew genotypes: cracks on trunk bark (a), crotch angle (b), (c) branching pattern, compactness of inflorescence (d) and apple apex (e).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Variability in cashew genotypes: inflorescence length (a), flower colour (b), cashew apple colour (c), ridges on cashew apple (d) and cashew apple shape (e).

Figure 4

Table 2. Multiple regression model for nut yield and its contributing traits for 2021 and 2022

Figure 5

Figure 4. Profile among genotypes using CsAmuta01 primer pair. Left to right: M, 100 bp DNA ladder, (1) local parent, (2) 2/9 Dicherla, (3) H-28, (4) H-30, (5) H-36, (6) H-39, (7) H-2/15, (8) red hazari, (9) H-109, (10) H-110, (11) H-111, (12) H-113, (13) H-114, (14) H-115, (15) H-117, (16) H-129, (17) H-130, (18) H-132, (19) H-133, (20) H-134, (21) H-135, (22) H-136, (23) H-137, (24) WBDC- V, (25) JGM-1, (26) H-49, (27) Bla-39-4, (28) H-146, (29) H-144, (30) H-147, (31) H-140, (32) H-142, (33) H-145, (34) yellow hazari, (35) H-153, (36) H-154, (37) H-155, (38) H-157, (39) H-158, (40) H-159, (41) H-160, (42) H-161, (43) H-162, (44) H-163, (45) H-164, (46) H-165, (47) H-166, (48) H-167, (49) H-168, (50) H-169, (51) H-170, (52) H-171, (53) H-172, (54) H-173, (55) H-174, (56) H-176.

Supplementary material: File

Das et al. supplementary material

Das et al. supplementary material
Download Das et al. supplementary material(File)
File 110.8 KB