Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T03:38:11.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extrusion behavior of impurities in upsetting process of rail flash butt welding based on finite element method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2019

Jiao Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Xi Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Da Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Qibing Lv*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Rui Ma
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: xnjdlvqibing@163.com

Abstract

Oxide inclusions such as gray spots are the main defects caused by rail flash butt welding (FBW). An appropriate temperature field and upsetting process are essential for the extrusion of joint impurities. This study constructed a thermomechanical coupling model for the solid-state upsetting process of rail FBW through a combination of finite element simulation and experiment. Subsequently, the effects of different temperature fields and upsetting parameters on the extrusion behavior of impurities were studied. The results show that when the lateral deformation of the joint is not considered, selecting the appropriate upsetting length and increasing the width of the high-temperature plastic zone are beneficial for the extrusion of harmful impurities. Moreover, using variable speed upsetting or increasing the speed of the early upsetting facilitates the extrusion of impurities. However, the impurities in the deeper areas of the rail are difficult to move, and they easily form gray spot defects if the oxide inclusions remain.

Information

Type
Invited Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1: Gray spots on the cross section of the rail flash welded joint.

Figure 1

Figure 2: The temperature distribution of rail top.

Figure 2

Figure 3: Macroscopic deformation of rail head and rail web: (a) simulation result and (b) actual welded joint.

Figure 3

Figure 4: Macroscopic deformation of rail bottom: (a) simulation result and (b) actual welded joint.

Figure 4

Figure 5: Metal flow direction of rail end face during upsetting.

Figure 5

Figure 6: The height of flanging in experiment and simulation.

Figure 6

Figure 7: The size and position of the impurity.

Figure 7

Figure 8: The displacement of the impurity: (a) front view and (b) sectional view.

Figure 8

Figure 9: Temperature distribution of different temperature fields.

Figure 9

TABLE I: The displacements of the highest point of impurity in different temperature fields.

Figure 10

Figure 10: The displacements of the highest point of impurity of different upsetting speeds.

Figure 11

Figure 11: Upsetting of constant speed and variable speed.

Figure 12

TABLE II: The displacement of the highest point of impurity of constant speed and variable speed.

Figure 13

Figure 12: The displacement curve of rail FBW experiment.

Figure 14

Figure 13: Displacement of impurity in different upsetting length.

Figure 15

Figure 14: The position of the impurities.

Figure 16

Figure 15: Displacement of the highest point of impurities at different locations: (a) impurities in the Y direction and (b) impurities in the Z direction.

Figure 17

Figure 16: The temperature field of rail bottom.

Figure 18

Figure 17: The macroscopic weld profile of the rail bottom.

Figure 19

Figure 18: Three-dimensional model of rail upsetting process: (a) three-dimensional overall model, (b) built-in layer, and (c) loading method.

Figure 20

TABLE III: The chemical composition of U75V.