Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:41:12.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beta diversity and similarity of lichen communities as a sign of the times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

Paolo GIORDANI
Affiliation:
DIFAR, University of Genova, Viale Cembrano 4, 16148 Genova, Italy. Email: giordani@difar.unige.it
Giorgio BRUNIALTI
Affiliation:
TerraData Environmetrics, Spin Off Company of the University of Siena, V. L. Bardelloni 19, 58025 Monterotondo Marittimo (GR), Italy
Marco CALDERISI
Affiliation:
TerraData Environmetrics, Spin Off Company of the University of Siena, V. L. Bardelloni 19, 58025 Monterotondo Marittimo (GR), Italy
Paola MALASPINA
Affiliation:
DIFAR, University of Genova, Viale Cembrano 4, 16148 Genova, Italy. Email: giordani@difar.unige.it
Luisa FRATI
Affiliation:
TerraData Environmetrics, Spin Off Company of the University of Siena, V. L. Bardelloni 19, 58025 Monterotondo Marittimo (GR), Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Currently, change in lichen community structure depends on a combination of several pollutants instead of just one. Consequently, alpha lichen diversity no longer represents an effective response variable for assessing trends in atmospheric pollutants over time. Here we investigated the value of the relationship between alpha diversity and different aspects of gamma diversity (similarity, replacement and differences in richness of species) together with that of beta diversity (calculated as the sum of replacement and difference in richness of species), for assessing complex variations in epiphytic lichen communities in response to a changing pollution scenario. We considered an area subjected to extreme variation in atmospheric pollution in recent decades and explored temporal and spatial aspects of lichen community succession over short-, intermediate- and long-term reference periods. We found that variation in lichen communities for long- and intermediate-term reference periods was strongly dependent on the alpha diversity of single trees at the beginning of the observation period. The occurrence of nitrophytic species, which responded to the decrease in SO2 concentrations, contribute to this trend. The effect of land use was observed only over long observation periods, with trees in urban areas showing less variation than those located in rural areas. In particular, the analysis of similarity, species replacement and differences in richness of tree pairs demonstrated that trends and patterns within lichen communities are neither always nor to the same extent associated with alpha diversity. Our results show that a thorough study of gamma diversity, including beta diversity and similarity, is required to detect changes in air quality in long-term biomonitoring surveys.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
© British Lichen Society, 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Survey area used in this study, the municipality of Porcari (LU), Tuscany, central Italy. Location of 93 sampled trees (circles) within two main land use categories, rural and urban/industrial.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Mean annual concentration (μg m−3) of sulphur and nitrogen dioxides in the study area measured using a regional network of automatic gauges. From 2005 onwards sulphur dioxide was below the threshold of detectability. Data source: http://www.arpat.toscana.it.

Figure 2

Table 1 Alpha diversity of lichens and percentage of nitrophytic species on trees sampled during three surveys in the Province of Lucca, NW Italy (Fig. 1)

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Changes in the number of nitrophytic lichen species on trees sampled in each of three reference periods in the study area: long-term (1997 vs. 2015, grey bars), intermediate-term (1997 vs. 2010, white bars) and short-term (2010 vs. 2015, black bars).

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Distribution of gamma diversity components in spatial and temporal datasets. R=species replacement, S=similarity and D=difference in richness. Box=25th–75th percentiles, line=median, whiskers=range, black circles=outliers.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Fitted modelled relationships between alpha diversity, land use and diversity components R, D and S, according to the GLM models of Table 2, for long-term (right) and short-term reference periods (left). Bands represent 95% confidence intervals. Solid line=rural land use, dashed line=urban/industrial land use

Figure 6

Table 2 Generalised Linear Models describing the effects of land use and alpha diversity on the gamma diversity components S (similarity), R (species replacement) and D (difference in richness) for long-, medium- and short-term reference periods. *=statistically significant

Figure 7

Fig. 6 Spatial patterns of lichen diversity on sampled trees (circles) in the study area. A, alpha diversity (number of species) in surveys undertaken in 1997, 2010 and 2015; B, beta diversity (sum of R and D) for three reference periods, 1997 vs. 2015, 1997 vs. 2010, and 2010 vs. 2015.

Figure 8