Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:31:14.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thin-film morphologies of block copolymers with nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2015

Dieter Jehnichen*
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Straße 6, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
Doris Pospiech
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Straße 6, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
Peter Friedel
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Straße 6, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
Guping He
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Straße 6, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
Alessandro Sepe
Affiliation:
Physik Department, Technische Universität München, Fachgebiet Physik weicher Materie James-Franck-Straße 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
Jianqi Zhang
Affiliation:
Physik Department, Technische Universität München, Fachgebiet Physik weicher Materie James-Franck-Straße 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
Christine M. Papadakis
Affiliation:
Physik Department, Technische Universität München, Fachgebiet Physik weicher Materie James-Franck-Straße 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
Rosa Taurino
Affiliation:
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Universita 4, I-41121 Modena, Italy
Jan Perlich
Affiliation:
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestr. 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: djeh@ipfdd.de

Abstract

Diblock copolymers (BCPs) show phase separation on mesoscopic length scales and form ordered morphologies in both bulk and thin films, the latter resulting in nanostructured surfaces. Morphologies in thin films are strongly influenced by film parameters, the ratio of film thickness and bulk domain spacing. Laterally structured polymer surfaces may serve as templates for controlled assembly of nanoparticles (NPs). We investigated the BCP of poly(n-pentyl methacrylate) and poly(methyl methacrylate) which show bulk morphologies of stacked lamellae or hexagonally packed cylinders. Thin films were investigated by atomic force microscopy and grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering. For film thicknesses f well below d bulk, standing cylinder morphologies were observed in appropriate molar ratios, while film thicknesses around and larger than d bulk resulted in cylinders arranged parallel to surface. To alter and/or improve the morphology also in presence of different NPs (e.g., silica, gold), solvent vapour annealing (SVA) was applied. The BCP morphology usually remains unchanged but periodicities change depending on type and amount of incorporated NPs. It was found that silica clusters enlarge lateral distances of cylinders, whereas Au NPs reduce it. The effect of SVA is weak. The quality of morphology is slightly improved by SVA and lateral distances remain constant or are slightly reduced.

Information

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the steps for achieving block copolymer/NP hybrids with PPMA-b-PMMA block copolymers in both applied preparation procedures.

Figure 1

Table I. BCPs PPMA-b-PMMA under investigation – chemical composition, molar masses, structure parameters of bulk morphology (T-SAXS) and thin films parameters from XRR and AFM (samples without NPs); all parameters are rounded.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (Color online) (a) TEM image (magnification: 400 000 × , scale bar: 10 nm) and (b) NP size distribution of dodecanthiol-stabilized Au NPs (Au18) with mean core diameter of 2 nm.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (Color online) Lorentz-corrected SAXS curves of corresponding BCP bulk material with hexagonal packed cylinder morphologies [with Miller indexing of the first reflections (hk0)]. (a) PM13, (b) PM70, (c) PM67, and (d) PM69.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (Color online) 20 nm films of sample PM13/Au18 vs. concentration of NPs [(a–d): 0, 1, 5, and 5 wt.%] and influence of SVA with THF [(a–c) as spin-coated, (d) vapour-annealed]. GISAXS pattern, scattering intensity plot (in miscolour) log(I) vs. qz, qy (qz range: approx. 0.08–0.78 nm−1, qy range: approx. −0.40–0.40 nm−1, mesh size Δq = 0.1 nm−1).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (Color online) AFM results from 20 nm films of sample PM13/Au18 vs. concentration of NPs [(a–c): 0, 1, and 5 wt.%; as spin-coated]. AFM phase contrast images (pattern size 2 × 2 µm2, scale 3°); (d) PSD of FFT image of AFM image (a) (L0 is the result from reading of the peak position).

Figure 6

Figure 6. (Color online) GISAXS results from 20 nm films of sample PM13/Au18 vs. concentration of NPs [(1–3): 0, 1, and 5 wt.%) and influence of SVA with THF (4) for film with 5 wt.% Au NPs]. Out-of-plane curves from the GISAXS patterns [Figures 4(a)–4(d)], taken at qz = qYoneda,BCP.

Figure 7

Table II. Hybrid thin films of BCP PM13 with Au18 NPs – thin-film parameters and effect of SVA (L0 from AFM, GISAXS d values found at αi = 0.20°; all parameters are rounded).

Figure 8

Figure 7. (Color online) GISAXS patterns of 40 nm thick films of sample PM70 after offline TEOS treatment (generation of SiO2 NPs). (a) as coated, (b) after treatment with TEOS vapour, (c) after treatment with H2O/HCl vapour, (d) after annealing at 100 °C in vacuum. Scattering intensity plot (in miscolour) log(I) vs. qz,qy (qz range: approx. 0.12–0.75 nm−1, qy range: approx. −0.36–0.36 nm−1, mesh size Δq = 0.1 nm−1). Additionally in (a), an AFM phase contrast pattern is shown (pattern size 2 × 2 µm2, scale 3°).

Figure 9

Figure 8. (Color online) Thin films of samples (a) PM70, (b) PM67, and (c) PM69: out-of-plane curves from GISAXS patterns at qz = qYoneda,BCP after offline TEOS treatment [(1) as coated, (2) after treatment with TEOS vapour, (3) after treatment with H2O/HCl vapour, (4) annealed at 100 °C in vacuum], curves are shifted vertically for clarity. Corresponding 2D GISAXS patterns are given in Figures 7(a)–7(d) at the example of sample PM70.

Figure 10

Table III. Silica generation in PPMA-b-PMMA films – thin-film parameters after treatment (GISAXS: d values found at αi = 0.20°; all parameters are rounded).