Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:06:12.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5-HT-receptive structures are localized in the interblastomere cleft of Paracеntrotus lividus early embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

Yu. B. Shmukler
Affiliation:
N.K. Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Acad. Sci. 26, Vavilov st., Moscow, 119334, Russia.
Francesco Silvestre
Affiliation:
Cell Biology Laboratory, Stazione Zoologica, Napoli, Italy.
Elisabetta Tosti*
Affiliation:
Cell Biology Laboratory, Stazione Zoologica, Napoli, Italy.
*
1All correspondence to: Elisabetta Tosti. Stazione Zoologica ‘Anton Dohrn’, Villa Comunale 1, 80121, Napoli, Italy. Tel: +39 81 5833288. Fax: +39 81 7641355. e-mail: tosti@szn.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Local application of the agonists of serotonin receptors of third type 5-HTQ, SR57277A and quipazine into the interblastomere cleft of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus embryo during first cleavage division, evokes specific membrane currents, whereas application of these drugs out of contact area show currents of lower amplitude and longer latent period. At the same time 5-HT3-receptor agonist quipazine imitates interblastomere signal in half embryos, but corresponding antagonists prevent it. Present data develop the hypothesis of protosynapse, demonstrating that the distribution of membrane serotonin receptors is limited to the period of cleavage division and localized in the interblastomere contact area. A possible role of spatial–temporal restriction of receptors at the interblastomere contact area is discussed in relation to the subsequent embryo development.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
Figure 0

Figure 1 Arrangement of patch-clamp and application micropipettes. (a) Application into contact area before adhesion, (b) after adhesion 1 – application micropipette; 2 – patch-clamp micropipette. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Inward current evoked by the addition of 2-methyl-serotonin (100 μm) into an experimental chamber during P. lividus first cleavage division. Arrows show the moment of the pulse. Abscissa – time (s), ordinate – current (pA).

Figure 2

Table 1 Effects of microapplication of chemicals on P. lividus blastomeres during first cleavage division

Figure 3

Figure 3 Membrane currents at microapplication of 5-HТQ (single pulse) on the free surface of a P. lividus blastomere during first cleavage division. Arrows show the moment of the pulse (a) to the contact area of P. lividus embryos during first cleavage division, abscissa – time (s), ordinate – current (pA); (b) on free surface of a P. lividus embryo during first cleavage division, abscissa – time (s), ordinate – current (pA).

Figure 4

Figure 4 Effects following microapplication of 5-HTQ and its addition to the experimental chamber during P. lividus first cleavage division. (a) Microapplication onto the free surface of blastomeres. (b) Addition of 5-HTQ to an experimental chamber to a final concentration of 100 μm. Abscissa – time (s), ordinate – current (pA).

Figure 5

Table 2 Effects of serotonergics on the pattern of cleavage of P. lividus half-embryos

Figure 6

Figure 5 Cleavage patterns of P. lividus half-embryos at fourth cleavage division. (a) Equal cleavage, (b) unequal cleavage. Arrow shows the micromere. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Figure 7

Figure 6 The ‘micromere model’. (a) Normal development of whole embryo. (b) Development of half-embryos, isolated before ‘post-division-adhesion’. (c) Development of half-embryos, isolated after ‘post-division adhesion’.

Figure 8

Figure 7 Models of a ‘protosynapse’ (a) with receptor localization in the interblastomere contact area; (b) with uniform distribution of receptors over the blastomere surface. R – receptor, Т – transmitter.