Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:29:40.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dense gas effects in inviscid homogeneous isotropic turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

L. Sciacovelli
Affiliation:
Laboratoire DynFluid, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 75013 Paris, France Dipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy
P. Cinnella*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire DynFluid, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 75013 Paris, France
C. Content
Affiliation:
Laboratoire DynFluid, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 75013 Paris, France
F. Grasso
Affiliation:
Laboratoire DynFluid, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 75013 Paris, France Laboratoire DynFluid, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, 75003 Paris, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: paola.cinnella@ensam.eu

Abstract

A detailed numerical study of the influence of dense gas effects on the large-scale dynamics of decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence is carried out by using the van der Waals gas model. More specifically, we focus on dense gases of the Bethe–Zel’dovich–Thompson type, which may exhibit non-classical nonlinearities in the transonic and supersonic flow regimes, under suitable thermodynamic conditions. The simulations are based on the inviscid conservation equations, solved by means of a ninth-order numerical scheme. The simulations rely on the numerical viscosity of the scheme to dissipate energy at the finest scales, while leaving the larger scales mostly unaffected. The results are systematically compared with those obtained for a perfect gas. Dense gas effects are found to have a significant influence on the time evolution of the average and root mean square (r.m.s.) of the thermodynamic properties for flows characterized by sufficiently high initial turbulent Mach numbers (above 0.5), whereas the influence on kinematic properties, such as the kinetic energy and the vorticity, are smaller. However, the flow dilatational behaviour is very different, due to the non-classical variation of the speed of sound in flow regions where the dense gas is characterized by a value of the fundamental derivative of the gas dynamics (a measure of the variation of the speed of sound in isentropic compressions) smaller than one or even negative. The most significant differences between the perfect and the dense gas case are found for the repartition of dilatation levels in the flow field. For the perfect gas, strong compressions occupy a much larger volume fraction than expansion regions, leading to probability distributions of the velocity divergence highly skewed toward negative values. For the dense gas, the volume fractions occupied by strong expansion and compression regions are much more balanced; moreover, strong expansion regions are characterized by sheet-like structures, unlike the perfect gas which exhibits tubular structures. In strong compression regions, where compression shocklets may occur, both the dense and the perfect gas exhibit sheet-like structures. This suggests the possibility that expansion eddy shocklets may appear in the dense gas. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that, in dense gas, vorticity is created with equal probability in strong compression and expansion regions, whereas for a perfect gas, vorticity is more likely to be created in the strong compression ones.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Clapeyron diagram for a BZT Van der Waals gas with ${\it\gamma}=1.0125$. (a) The iso-${\it\Gamma}$ (grey contours and solid lines) are reported as a function of $v/v_{c}$. (b) The iso-${\it\Gamma}$ (grey contours) and the iso-$c$ (solid lines) are reported as a function of $v/v_{c}$. The dash-dotted line represents the critical isotherm $T/T_{c}=1$. In the figure the dark grey zone represents the inversion zone, corresponding to the region between the transition line and the saturation curve where ${\it\Gamma}<0$.

Figure 1

Table 1. Thermodynamic properties of PP11: molecular weight ($\mathscr{M}$), critical temperature ($T_{c}$), critical density (${\it\rho}_{c}$), critical pressure ($p_{c}$), critical compressibility factor ($Z_{c}$), acentric factor (${\it\omega}$), dipole moment of the gas phase (d.m.), boiling temperature ($T_{b}$) and ratio of ideal gas specific heat at constant volume over the gas constant ($c_{v}(T_{c})/R$) at the critical point.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Numerical errors (a) and effective viscosity (b) of the ninth-order scheme as a function of the reduced wavenumber. In (a): ——, dissipation function; — ⋅ —, normalized phase error.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Comparison between the present results for CHIT decay at $M_{t_{0}}=0.2$ and ${\it\chi}_{0}=0$ using the ninth-order scheme and Jameson’s second-order scheme and those of Garnier et al. (1999) based on a fifth-order modified ENO scheme (MENO) and Jameson’s scheme. The grid in use is composed by $128^{3}$ cells. Time histories of the turbulent kinetic energy (a), enstrophy (b), pseudo-Taylor microscale (c) and spectrum of the turbulent kinetic energy at $t=10$ (d).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Comparison of the present results for a ninth-order accurate scheme with those provided by Garnier et al. (1999) using a fourth-order ENO scheme, for different choices of the initial conditions. Lines denote the present results, symbols results from the reference.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Influence of grid resolution for a PFG CHIT simulation. Here, the working fluid is a perfect gas with ${\it\gamma}=1.4$, and the initial turbulent Mach number is $M_{t,0}=0.8$. (a–c) Show the time histories of the normalized r.m.s. density (a), the pseudo-Taylor microscale (b) and the normalized enstrophy (c); (d,e) show the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum (d) and the p.d.f. of velocity divergence (e) at $t=2.5$.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Influence of grid resolution for a DG CHIT simulation. Here, the working fluid is PP1, modelled as a polytropic VDW gas, and the initial turbulent Mach number is $M_{t,0}=0.8$. (a) Shows the time history of the normalized enstrophy; (b,c) show the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum (b) and the p.d.f. of the velocity divergence (c) at $t=2.5$.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Comparison of Euler-based and Navier–Stokes-based results for PFG. (a–d) Show the time histories of the normalized r.m.s. density (a), the normalized r.m.s. sound speed (b), the turbulent kinetic energy (c) and the normalized r.m.s. velocity divergence (d) at various Reynolds numbers.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Comparison of Euler-based and Navier–Stokes-based results for PFG simulations. (a) Turbulent kinetic energy spectrum and (b) p.d.f. of the normalized velocity divergence evaluated at $t=2.5$ at various Reynolds numbers.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Comparison of Euler-based and Navier–Stokes-based results for DG simulations. (a) Turbulent kinetic energy spectrum and (b) p.d.f. of the normalized velocity divergence evaluated at $t=2.5$ at various Reynolds numbers.

Figure 10

Table 2. Cases considered to study the influence of the artificial dissipation coefficients.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Influence of the artificial dissipation coefficients $k_{2}$ and $k_{10}$ ($256^{3}$ grid, $M_{t,0}=0.8$, perfect gas with ${\it\gamma}=1.4$). (a,b) Show the time histories of the normalized turbulent kinetic energy (a), the normalized enstrophy (b). (c,d) Show the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum (c) and the p.d.f. of velocity divergence (d) at $t=2.5$.

Figure 12

Table 3. PFG simulations: influence of the specific heat ratio. Values of the specific heat ratio (${\it\gamma}$), specific heat coefficient at constant volume ($c_{v}$) and at constant pressure ($c_{p}$) and fundamental derivative of gas dynamics ${\it\Gamma}$.

Figure 13

Figure 11. PFG simulations: influence of the specific heat ratio. Time evolution of the r.m.s. of the sound speed (a), of the pressure (b) and of the density (c). $p_{rms}$ and $c_{rms}$ are rescaled according to (4.2) and (4.4), respectively.

Figure 14

Figure 12. PFG simulations: influence of the specific heat ratio. Time evolution of the turbulent Mach number (a), turbulent kinetic energy (b), normalized r.m.s. of the vorticity ${\it\omega}_{rms}/{\it\omega}_{0}$ (c), normalized r.m.s. of the dilatation ${\it\theta}_{rms}/{\it\omega}_{0}$ (d), kinetic energy spectrum (e) and p.d.f. of the local Mach number at $t=2.5$ (f).

Figure 15

Table 4. Volume fraction occupied by flow regions with different dilatation levels at time $t=2.5$.

Figure 16

Figure 13. Representation in the $p{-}v$ plane of the initial thermodynamic conditions used for the dense gas simulations using the VDW model. I.C. represents the initial thermodynamic state; the dashed line $s=s_{i}$ represents the isentropic curve containing the initial thermodynamic state; $T=T_{c}$ the critical isotherm, the dark grey region bounded by ${\it\Gamma}=0$ (the transition line) is the inversion zone; the grey region to the right of the ${\it\Gamma}=1$ is the dense gas region.

Figure 17

Table 5. Initial thermodynamic conditions used for the dense gas simulations using the PFG and VDW equations of state.

Figure 18

Figure 14. PFG and DG simulations. Kinetic energy spectra at $t=2.5$ at various initial turbulent Mach numbers. - - - -, $M_{t,0}=0.2$; – - – - –, $M_{t,0}=0.5$; ——, $M_{t,0}=0.8$; — — —, $M_{t,0}=1$. ○, VDW; ▵, PFG.

Figure 19

Figure 15. PFG and DG simulations. Time evolution of the r.m.s. density (a), turbulent Mach number (b), average speed of sound (c) and r.m.s. speed of sound (d). - - - -, $M_{t,0}=0.2$; – - – - –, $M_{t,0}=0.5$; ——, $M_{t,0}=0.8$; — — —, $M_{t,0}=1$. ○, VDW; ▵, PFG.

Figure 20

Figure 16. PFG and DG simulations. Time histories of the average (a) and r.m.s. (b) fundamental derivative of gas dynamics for the dense gas at various initial turbulent Mach numbers. - - - -, $M_{t,0}=0.2$; – - – - –, $M_{t,0}=0.5$; ——, $M_{t,0}=0.8$; — — —, $M_{t,0}=1$. ○, VDW.

Figure 21

Figure 17. Representation in the $p{-}v$ diagram of the thermodynamic states at $t=2.5$. Each symbol represents the thermodynamic conditions computed at a given mesh points at various initial Mach numbers. The spread of thermodynamic states (approximately distributed along an isentropic curve) increases with the Mach number, due to compressibility effects.

Figure 22

Figure 18. Instantaneous isocontours ($t=2.5$) of the fundamental derivative of gas dynamics (a), the normalized speed of sound $c/c_{0}$ (b), and normalized density ${\it\rho}/{\it\rho}_{0}$ (c) along a mesh plane for a dense gas computation at $M_{t,0}=1$. At high Mach number dense gas computations, these thermodynamic properties exhibit significant large-scale fluctuations. Specifically, ${\it\Gamma}$ can take both positive and negative values. In negative regions, non-classical nonlinearities may appear.

Figure 23

Figure 19. PFG and DG simulations. Time evolution of the r.m.s. divergence of the velocity field normalized with the initial vorticity at various initial turbulent Mach numbers. - - - -, $M_{t,0}=0.2$; – - – - –, $M_{t,0}=0.5$; ——, $M_{t,0}=0.8$; — — —, $M_{t,0}=1$. ○, VDW; ▵, PFG.

Figure 24

Figure 20. Instantaneous iso-contours of the normalized velocity divergence ${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}$ at various times, for $M_{t_{0}}=1$. Results for the PFG case are represented in (a), dense gas in (b). Red regions correspond to strong compressions (${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}<-3$), green regions to strong expansions (${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}>3$).

Figure 25

Table 6. Volume fraction occupied by compression and expansion regions at time $t=2.5$.

Figure 26

Figure 21. Snapshots at $t=2.5$ of the isosurfaces ${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}=3$, coloured by the local Mach number, for perfect and dense gas simulations at $M_{t,0}=1$.

Figure 27

Figure 22. Snapshots at $t=2.5$ of the isosurfaces ${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}=-3$, coloured by the local Mach number, for perfect and dense gas simulations at $M_{t,0}=1$.

Figure 28

Figure 23. P.d.f. of the normalized velocity divergence scaled by $M_{t,0}^{2}$ at various initial turbulent Mach numbers (and $t=2.5$). The vertical dashed lines indicate the values ${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}=\pm 3$. ○, VDW; ▵, PFG.

Figure 29

Table 7. Volume fraction occupied by flow regions characterized by different ${\it\Gamma}$ values, conditioned on dilatation levels (dense gas simulations at $M_{t,0}=1$, $t=2.5$). First row corresponds to regions characterized by ${\it\Gamma}<0$ (thermodynamic states falling in the inversion zone); second row to regions with $0<{\it\Gamma}<1$ (dense gas region); third row to regions having ${\it\Gamma}>1$. The last column provides the total volume fraction for each thermodynamic region.

Figure 30

Figure 24. Distribution of the conditioned mean of the fundamental derivative of gas dynamics $\langle {\it\Gamma}\rangle$ on ${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}$ at various $M_{t,0}$.

Figure 31

Figure 25. Contours of the joint probability density function (log scale) of the fundamental derivative of gas dynamics ${\it\Gamma}$ with the scaled normalized local velocity divergence ${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}$ at various initial turbulent Mach numbers.

Figure 32

Figure 26. Probability density function of the normalized sound speed conditioned on ${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}$ at $M_{t,0}=1$. - - - -, $[-\infty ,-2]$; — — —, $[2,\infty ]$; ——, $[-\infty ,\infty ]$. ○, VDW; ▵, PFG.

Figure 33

Figure 27. Probability density functions of the local Mach number at various initial turbulent Mach numbers at $t=2.5$. VDW, ($\bigcirc$); PFG, ($\triangle$).

Figure 34

Figure 28. Total probability density function of the local Mach number (a) and the normalized local vorticity (b) and p.d.f. conditioned on strong compressions (${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}<-2$) and strong expansions (${\it\theta}/{\it\theta}_{rms}>2$) for $M_{t,0}=1$ at time $t=2.5$. - - - -, $[-\infty ,-2]$; — — —, $[2,\infty ]$; ——, $[-\infty ,\infty ]$. ○, VDW; ▵, PFG.