Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:53:13.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biventricular pacing in children with complete atrioventricular block*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Fumiaki Shikata*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ehime University, Ehime, Japan
Mitsugi Nagashima
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ehime University, Ehime, Japan
Takashi Higaki
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ehime University, Ehime, Japan
*
Correspondence to: F. Shikata, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ehime University, Shitsukawa Toon City, Ehime 791-1125, Japan. Tel: +81 89 960 5331; Fax: +81 89 960 5332; E-mail: shika@blue.ocn.ne.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We performed pacemaker implantation with biventricular pacing using a usual dual-chamber pacemaker device in three children with complete atrioventricular block. The post-operative QRS durations were 114, 112, and 106 milliseconds in patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Post-operative echocardiography revealed well-synchronised left ventricles. Biventricular pacing in children with complete atrioventricular block may be useful for shortening the QRS duration.

Information

Type
Brief Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1 (a) Intraoperative schema; left ventricular pacing lead was implanted into the lateral wall of the left ventricle using a Tentacles device without haemodynamic compromise. (b) Position of the pacing leads from anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) projections. Positioning of the ventricular epicardial pacing leads on the basal lateral wall of the left ventricle (arrow A) and right ventricular outflow tract (arrow B) was directed by transesophageal echocardiography. A usual dual chamber device was used (arrow C).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Post-operative 12-lead electrocardiogram shows short QRS duration in patient 1 (a, 114 milliseconds), patient 2 (b, 112 milliseconds), and patient 3 (c, 106 milliseconds).