Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:04:53.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sources and oxidation state of the Permian arc magmatic rocks of SW Jilin Province in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt: evidence from Li, Hf isotopes and oxygen fugacity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2022

Chang-Jian Chen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, MNR Key Laboratory of Paleomagnetism and Tectonic Reconstruction, Beijing 100081, China Gemological Institute, School of Earth Sciences, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hidden Metallic Ore Deposits Exploration, School of Earth Sciences, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
Shuan-Hong Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, MNR Key Laboratory of Paleomagnetism and Tectonic Reconstruction, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author for correspondence: Chang-Jian Chen, Email: changjian_chen@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The late Palaeozoic continental-arc magmatic rocks in the Gongzhuling area are located in the Liaoyuan Accretionary Belt. Here we present new zircon U–Pb ages, whole-rock major- and trace-element compositions, Li and zircon Hf isotopic compositions and oxygen fugacity of these rocks with an aim to constrain the lithium isotopic composition of the source region and origin of the magmas. These rocks were formed during 269–258 Ma in middle–late Permian time. The dioritic rocks were formed through mixing processes, with the mafic melts originating from a metasomatized mantle wedge and the felsic melts from the lower crust of a Neoproterozoic arc. The mantle wedge has been metasomatized by Li-rich fluids derived from subducted oceanic crust, as indicated by the δ7Li values of +0.4 ‰ to +3.5 ‰ and positive ϵHf(t) values (+0.7 to +13.1). Redox-sensitive Ce in the zircons indicates the fO2 of the magmas to be low to intermediate (FMQ−2.2 to FMQ+2.6; FMQ is the fayalite–magnetite–quartz redox buffer), precluding large-scale porphyry Cu–Mo mineralization. The middle–late Permian magmatic rocks represent the terminal magmatic record of the subduction of the Palaeo-Asian oceanic crust, meaning that the final closure of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt occurred at the end of the Permian Period. Recent identification of Mesoproterozoic (c. 1400 Ma) granites suggests some Palaeoproterozoic crustal fragments still exist in the Liaoyuan Accretionary Belt, but only in a small amount; therefore, it is concluded that the crustal growth of the Liaoyuan Accretionary Belt occurred mainly during the Neoproterozoic period.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Overview of the study area. (a) Simplified geological map showing the location of NE China, modified after Zhang et al. (2004). (b) Distribution of granitoids and tectonic units of NE China, modified after Wu et al. (2007), Zhang et al. (2014) and Wang et al. (2017). (c) Distribution of granitoids and sampling locations in the Gongzhuling area, SW Jilin Province, NE China.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Photographs of outcrops showing different rock types of the Gongzhuling intermediate–felsic rocks. (a) Dacite tuff (43° 34.81′ N, 125° 06.23′ E). (b) Pyroxene diorite (43° 27.14′ N, 125° 54.86′ E). (c) Pyroxene diorite (43° 26.55′ N, 124° 56.19′ E). (d) Diorite (43° 27.28′ N, 125° 00.24′ E). (e) Quartz monzodiorite (43° 24.11′ N, 124° 52.13′ E). (f) Biotite syenogranite (43° 30.58′ N, 125° 12.17′ E). Length of pen for scale is 15 cm; length of hammer for scale is 50 cm; diameter of coin for scale is 2.5 cm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Photomicrographs showing typical textures of the Gongzhuling intermediate–felsic rocks. (a) Dacite tuff (09326-1). (b) Pyroxene diorite (09335-1). (c) Diorite (09331-1). (d) Diorite (09340-2). (e) Quartz monzodiorite (09346-1). (f) Biotite syenogranite (09328-1). Cpx – clinopyroxene; Hb – hornblende; Pl – plagioclase; Ti – titanite; Kfs – K-feldspar; Q – quartz; Mag – magnetite.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircons and U–Pb concordia diagrams for the zircons from intermediate–felsic rocks in the Gongzhuling area. The small yellow circles are U–Pb dating spots and the large circles represent locations of Hf isotopic analyses. The data beside the large circles are ϵHf(t) values.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Harker diagrams for the intermediate–felsic rocks in the Gongzhuling area.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Plots of selected trace-element contents versus silica contents for the intermediate–felsic rocks in the Gongzhuling area.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE and (b) primitive-mantle-normalized trace-element variation diagrams for the middle–late Permian intermediate–felsic rocks in the Gongzhuling area. Chondrite and primitive mantle values are from Boynton (1984) and Sun & McDonough (1989), respectively.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Zircon Lu–Hf isotopes of the Gongzhuling middle–late Permian magmatic rocks. (a) Histogram of ϵHf(t) values. (b) ϵHf(t) versus U–Pb zircon ages.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Plot of δ7Li versus Li for the intermediate–felsic rocks in the Gongzhuling area. Also shown for comparison are data for global S- and I-type granites.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Lithium isotopes versus trace-element compositions of the intermediate–felsic intrusive rocks in the Gongzhuling area. Also shown are mean compositional values for mantle end-members mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) and ocean island basalt (OIB) from Sun & McDonough (1989), Armienti & Gasperini (2007) and Nishio et al. (2007); subduction zone arc volcanic rocks from Miller et al. (1994) and Pearce et al. (1995). DM – depleted mantle; EM – enriched mantle.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Plots of (a) δ7Li versus SiO2 and (b) δ7Li versus Li for the intermediate–felsic rocks in the Gongzhuling area. Data for mantle end-members are from Krienitz et al. (2012) and data for juvenile lower crust are from Tian et al. (2018). Data for altered oceanic crust are from Chan et al. (1992), Ryan & Langmuir (1987), Chan & Edmond (1988), Moriguti & Nakamura (1998) and Zack et al. (2003).

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Zircon oxygen fugacities. (a) Oxygen fugacity versus Ti-in-zircon temperature plot for the Gongzhuling magmatic rocks. The HM, FMQ, NNO and IW buffers are from Myers & Eugster (1983) and O’Neil & Pownceby (1993). (b) ΔFMQ versus MgO plot. Data area for oxidized fertile magma is from Li et al. (2019).

Supplementary material: File

Chen and Zhang supplementary material

Tables S1-S5

Download Chen and Zhang supplementary material(File)
File 135.1 KB