Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:50:03.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metabolic programming in offspring of mice fed fructose during pregnancy and lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2021

Marina Lummertz Magenis
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Translational Biomedicine, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Adriani Paganini Damiani
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Translational Biomedicine, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Gustavo de Bem Silveira
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Experimental Pathophysiology, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Ligia Salvan Dagostin
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Translational Biomedicine, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Pamela Souza de Marcos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Translational Biomedicine, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Emanuel de Souza
Affiliation:
Course of Biomedicine, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Laura de Roch Casagrande
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Experimental Pathophysiology, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Luiza Martins Longaretti
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Translational Biomedicine, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Paulo Cesar Lock Silveira
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Experimental Pathophysiology, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
Vanessa Moraes de Andrade*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Translational Biomedicine, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina – UNESC, Criciúma, SC, Brazil
*
Address for correspondence: Vanessa Moraes de Andrade, Laboratory of Translational Biomedicine, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, UNESC, 1105, Universitária Rd, 88806000, Criciúma, SC, Brazil. Email: vmoraesdeandrade@yahoo.com.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fructose (C6H12O6), also known as levulose, is a hexose. Chronic consumption of fructose may be associated with increased intrahepatic fat concentration and the development of insulin resistance as well as an increase in the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hyperlipidemia during pregnancy. Despite the existence of many studies regarding the consumption of fructose in pregnancy, its effects on fetuses have not yet been fully elucidated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the genetic and biochemical effects in offspring (male and female) of female mice treated with fructose during pregnancy and lactation. Pairs of 60-day-old Swiss mice were used and divided into three groups; negative control and fructose, 10%/l and 20%/l doses of fructose groups. After offspring birth, the animals were divided into six groups: P1 and P2 (males and females), water; P3 and P4 (males and females) fructose 10%/l; and P5 and P6 (males and females) fructose 20%/l. At 30 days of age, the animals were euthanized for genetic and biochemical assessments. Female and male offspring from both dosage groups demonstrated genotoxicity (evaluated through comet assay) and oxidative stress (evaluated through nitrite concentration, sulfhydril content and superoxide dismutase activity) in peripheral and brain tissues. In addition, they showed nutritional and metabolic changes due to the increase in food consumption, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Therefore, it is suggested that high consumption of fructose by pregnant female is harmful to their offspring. Thus, it is important to carry out further studies and make pregnant women aware of excessive fructose consumption during this period.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Experimental Design of the Nutritional model of maternal fructose consumption Treatment with different doses of fructose (10%/l and 20%/l) or drinking water during copulation (7 days), pregnancy (21 days), and lactation (21 days), and offspring evaluation.

Figure 1

Table 1. Intake of food (g), energy efficiency (g/kcal), and total energy consumption (g/kcal) of female and male offspring of fructose-treated female Swiss mice during pregnancy and lactation

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Body weight curve (g) of female offspring of fructose-treated female Swiss mice during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of mean body weight over different periods (n = 8 animals per group). *Significant difference compared to the control group in the same period (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Body weight curve (g) of male offspring of fructose-treated female Swiss mice during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of mean body weight over different periods (n = 8 animals per group). *Significant difference compared to the control group in the same period (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test).

Figure 4

Table 2. Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) and lipid profile (total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and ratio of triglycerides/high density lipoprotein) of female and male offspring of fructose-treated female Swiss mice during pregnancy and lactation

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Damage index (0-400) peripheral tissues of 30-day-old female offspring Swiss mice, whose mothers received water or fructose (10%/l; 20%/l) during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8 animals per group). (a) Peripheral blood; (b) liver; (c) kidney. *Significant difference compared to control group (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test). #Significant difference in relation to fructose 10%/l group (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Damage index (0-400) brain tissues of 30-day-old female offspring Swiss mice, whose mothers received water or fructose (10%/l; 20%/l) during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8 animals per group). (a) Cortex; (b) Hippocampus; (c) Striatum. *Significant difference compared to control group p< 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test).

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Damage index (0-400) peripheral tissues of 30-day-old male offspring Swiss mice whose mothers received water or fructose (10%/l; 20%/l) during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8 animals per group). (a) Peripheral blood; (b) liver; (c): kidney. *Significant difference compared to control group (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test). #Significant difference from the fructose 10%/l group (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test).

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Damage index (0-400) brain tissues of 30-day-old male offspring Swiss mice, whose mothers received water or fructose (10%/l; 20%/l) during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8 animals per group). (a) Cortex; (b) Hippocampus; (c) Striatum. *Significant difference compared to control group p < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test).

Figure 9

Table 3. Number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE) and micronucleated normochromatic erythrocytes (MNNCE) in samples of bone marrow from female and male offspring of 30-day-old Swiss mice whose mothers received water or fructose during pregnancy and lactation

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Nitrite concentration in the liver and hippocampus of 30-day-old female and male offspring Swiss mice, whose mothers received water or fructose (10%/l; 20%/l) during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 6 animals per group). (a) Liver of offspring female; (b) Liver of offspring male; (c) Hippocampus of offspring female; (d) Hippocampus of offspring male. *Significant difference in relation to the control group p < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test).

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Sulfhydryl content in the liver and hippocampus of 30-day-old female and male offspring Swiss mice, whose mothers received water or fructose (10%/l; 20%/l) during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 6 animals per group). (a) Liver of offspring female; (b) Liver of offspring male; (c) Hippocampus of offspring female; (d) Hippocampus of offspring male. *Significant difference compared to control group p < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test).

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Superoxide dismutase activity in the liver and hippocampus of 30-day-old female and male offspring Swiss mice whose mothers received water or fructose (10%/l; 20%/l) during pregnancy and lactation. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 6 animals per group). (a) Liver of offspring female; (b) Liver of offspring male; (c) Hippocampus of offspring female; (d) Hippocampus of offspring male. *Significant difference compared to control group p < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test).