Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T16:25:33.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial variation of East Asian winter monsoon evolution between northern and southern China since the last glacial maximum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2021

Qin Li
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Haibin Wu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing, 100044, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Jun Cheng
Affiliation:
College of Oceanography, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Shuya Zhu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Chunxia Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Jianyu Wu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Yating Lin
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Pei Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Xiangbin Ren
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Deai Zhao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Yan Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
*
*Corresponding author e-mail address: Haibin-wu@mail.iggcas.ac.cn (H. Wu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM) is one of the most dynamic components of the global climate system. Although poorly understood, knowledge of long-term spatial differences in EAWM variability during the glacial–interglacial cycles is important for understanding the dynamic processes of the EAWM. We reconstructed the spatiotemporal characteristics of the EAWM since the last glacial maximum (LGM) using a comparison of proxy records and long-term transient simulations. A loess grain-size record from northern China (a sensitive EAWM proxy) and the sea surface temperature gradient of an EAWM index in sediments of the southern South China Sea were compared. The data–model comparison indicates pronounced spatial differences in EAWM evolution, with a weakened EAWM since the LGM in northern China but a strengthened EAWM from the LGM to the early Holocene, followed by a weakening trend, in southern China. The model results suggest that variations in the EAWM in northern China were driven mainly by changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration and Northern Hemisphere ice sheets, whereas orbital insolation and ice sheets were important drivers in southern China. We propose that the relative importance of insolation, ice sheets, and atmospheric CO2 for EAWM evolution varied spatially within East Asia.

Information

Type
Thematic Set: Eurasian Climate and Environment
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2021
Figure 0

Figure 1. (color online) (a) Site location, showing major atmospheric circulation regimes in East Asia and locations of the Gulang, Jingyuan, Huanxian, Xifeng, Xunyi, and Shiguanzhai loess profiles and the record of the sea surface temperature (SST) gradient in the South China Sea. (b) Profile of the sampled loess–paleosol sequence (L0, S0, L1LL1 and L1SS1) at Weinan. EAWM, East Asian winter monsoon; EASM, East Asian summer monsoon; WJ, Westerly jet; ISM, Indian Summer Monsoon.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Records of lithology, magnetic susceptibility, and mean grain-size records and the location of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dates for the Weinan (WN) and Weinan-1 (WN-1) sections. The chronology for WN is based on OSL dates from WN-1. (a) Lithology for WN; (b) magnetic susceptibility record for WN; (c) mean grain-size record for WN; (d) mean grain-size record for WN-1 (Kang et al., 2013); (e) magnetic susceptibility record for WN-1 (Kang et al., 2013); (f) OSL ages and errors (1σ error bars) for WN-1 (Kang et al., 2013); (g) lithology for WN-1 (Kang et al., 2013). Dashed lines link the age control points for WN and WN-1.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (color online) Grain-size frequency distribution of a typical sample from Weinan (WN) and its four numerically partitioned components.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Variations of median grain size and of four numerically partitioned grain-size components from Weinan (WN) since the last glacial maximum (LGM). (a) Median grain size; (b) C1 (grain size <2 μm); (c) C2 (grain size 8–16 μm); (d) C3 (grain size 29–35 μm); (e) C4 (grain size >70 μm). Dashed lines represent the mean values of the median grain size and component C3.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Comparison of various grain-size records of East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM) intensity since the last glacial maximum (LGM). (a) Stacked normalized grain size (% >30 μm) record from the Huanxian (HX), Xifeng (XF), Xunyi (XY), Shiguanzhai (SG) section in the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP) (Stevens and Lu, 2009; Lu et al., 2011); (b) record of grain-size component 3 (29–35 μm) from the Weinan (WN) section; (c) mean grain-size record from the Jingyuan section in the western CLP (Sun et al., 2012); (d) Mean grain-size record from the Gulang section in the western CLP (Sun et al., 2012). Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages and errors (1σ error bars) for the four sequences are indicated. The locations of the loess profiles are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (color online) Response of proxy- and model-derived East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM) changes to insolation, ice sheets, and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) forcing. (a) Winter (December–January–February [DJF]) insolation at 30°N (Berger and Loutre, 1991); (b) atmospheric CO2 concentration from Dome Concordia, Antarctica (Lüthi et al., 2008; Parrenin et al., 2013); (c) Northern Hemisphere ice-sheet area (Dyke, 2004) (right scale); (d) Siberian High Index (SHI) from the TraCE simulation, which was based on the maximum value of sea-level pressure (SLP) in winter (DJF) (Sahsamanoglou et al., 1991) over the region (40–55°N, 90–120°E); (e) EAWM record based on the variation of grain-size component 3 (29–35 μm) from the Weinan (WN) section in northern China (this study) (right scale); (f) changes in EAWM wind index in northern China in the full TraCE simulation; (g) changes in EAWM wind index in southern China in the full TraCE simulation (right scale); (h) EAWM reconstruction based on alkenone-based west–east SST gradient from the southern South China Sea (SCS) (Huang et al., 2011).

Figure 6

Figure 7. (color online) Modeled East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM) index for northern China (a) and southern China (b) in full and single forcing experiments from the TraCE21 simulation. Full TraCE simulation (labeled “TRACE”) with changes in transient forcing by insolation, greenhouse gases (GHGs), ice sheets, and meltwater fluxes (MWFs); ORB (only insolation forcing); ice sheet (only ice-sheet forcing); CO2 (only GHG forcing); MWF (only MWF forcing). DJF, December–January–February.

Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Li et al. supplementary material

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 68 KB