Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T11:40:06.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motivations for Clostridioides difficile testing algorithms among Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2026

Elise Martin
Affiliation:
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
Robin Jump
Affiliation:
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
Dimitri Drekonja
Affiliation:
Minneapolis VA Health Care System

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Background: There is no gold standard approach to Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) testing clinically. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) uses the last test in a series to determine if positive testing will be considered a healthcare associated infection (HAI) and there is concern that this may impact testing choice. Increasingly, healthcare facilities are considering 2-step testing algorithms, but limited data exists on clinical or surveillance motivations for algorithm choice. Methods: In October and November 2023, we distributed electronic surveys to Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) infection preventionists and infectious diseases physicians asking about current facility C. difficile testing practices, motivations for their current strategy, and considerations for change. Only one response was included per facility. Duplicate responses from the same facility were combined. Data were analyzed using Chi-squared tests. Results: Among 126 VAMCs, 72 (57%) completed the survey. The most common testing strategies were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with reflex to toxin (n=31, 43%) and PCR with reflex to glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)/toxin (n=20, 28%) when PCR is positive. Less common strategies included PCR alone (n=9, 13%), GDH/toxin with reflex to PCR when discordant (either GDH or toxin positive) (n=5, 7%), GDH/toxin alone (n=1, 1%), and other (n=6, 8%). Factors associated with testing strategy selection were avoidance of overdiagnosis (78%), to decrease rate of C. difficile HAIs (56%), and ease of interpretation (33%) (Figure 1). When comparing 2-step testing algorithms, avoiding overdiagnosis was a motivation for positive PCR with reflex to toxin or GDH/toxin (84%) as well as GDH/toxin with reflex to PCR (80%) (p=0.8). When compared to PCR with reflex to toxin or GDH/toxin, sites using GDH/toxin with reflex to PCR more frequently reported test turn-around-time (80% vs 14%, p≤0.001) and cost (60% vs 8%, p≤0.001) as motivating factors. Sites using PCR with reflex to toxin or GDH/toxin were more motivated by decreasing HAIs than GDH/toxin with reflex to PCR (63% vs 40%), although not statistically significant. Notably, 40% of facilities reported switching their testing strategy within 2 years of survey and 24% were actively considering a change. Conclusion: The most common testing strategy among VAMCs is a 2-step algorithm starting with PCR, then reflex to either toxin or GDH/toxin when PCR positive, driven by desire to avoid overdiagnosis and decrease HAI rates. It is unclear how this actually impacts rates or if this will change if facilities move to healthcare facility-onset, treated C. difficile infection metrics.

A bar graph showing motivations for selecting C. difficile testing strategies among V A Medical Centers.

Information

Type
C. difficile
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America