Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T04:11:47.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lightweight and stiff cellular ceramic structures by ice templating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2014

Florian Bouville*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Synthèse et Fonctionnalisation des Céramiques, UMR3080 CNRS/Saint-Gobain, Cavaillon, France; and Université de Lyon, INSA-Lyon, MATEIS CNRS UMR5510, Villeurbanne, France
Eric Maire
Affiliation:
Université de Lyon, INSA-Lyon, MATEIS CNRS UMR5510, Villeurbanne, France
Sylvain Deville
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Synthèse et Fonctionnalisation des Céramiques, UMR3080 CNRS/Saint-Gobain, Cavaillon, France
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: florian.bouville@saint-gobain.com

Abstract

Porous, strong, and stiff ceramic materials are required for a range of technical applications, involving for instance, liquid or gas flow. Natural materials such as wood can provide useful structural guidelines for the optimal microstructural design, although only few processing routes are able to turn these guidelines into actual materials. We illustrate here, how ice templating of anisotropic particle suspensions can be modified to obtain a honeycomb structure with pores of 30 µm diameter. The growth of ice crystals in the slurry induces self-assembly of the anisotropic particles, leading to relatively thin walls (10 µm). Because large anisotropic particles are difficult to sinter, a glassy phase was introduced to facilitate this densification step and then to further reduce the walls' porosity. Young's modulus and compressive strength were both improved by the addition of a glassy phase by an order of magnitude due to the denser walls. These macroporous materials are more robust and stiff than materials with an equivalent morphology, while offering a simple alternative to the current wood replica processing routes.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. SEM micrographs of porous alumina structures obtained under the same conditions with (a) large alumina platelets and (b) small isotropic particles. Cross-section perpendicular to the temperature gradient. (c) Closer view of a macropore.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Three-dimensional structure obtained by tomography containing alumina platelets and 10 vol% of glassy phase. The arrowheads indicate the beginning of a new cell. The white arrow indicates the solidification direction.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Evolution of (a) the relative density, (b) the intergranular, and (c) the macroporosity of the cellular material with alumina platelets versus the amount of glassy phase.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Influence of glassy phase content on the structural and mechanical properties of the cellular material containing alumina platelets. SEM pictures of the structure with (d) 0 vol%, (e) 5 vol%, and (f) 10 vol% of glassy phase. Scale bars: 5 µm.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Typical stress–strain curves obtained under compression as a function of the glassy phase content. Dots represent the first recorded crack propagation.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Compressive strength of our ice-templated alumina structures compared to macroporous alumina obtained by various techniques: direct foaming, polymer replica, sacrificial templating,26 wood replica,7 ice templating of composites,16,27 freezing/foaming,28 and freezing/extrusion.11 Reproduced from Gonzenbach et al.26

Figure 6

TABLE I. Comparison of specific Young's modulus for different materials with similar architecture.