Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T11:07:19.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of the Yazlıca celadonitic clays (Kütahya, Türkiye) and their potential uses in the ceramic industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2025

Emre Kaçar*
Affiliation:
Keramika R&D Center, Keramika Ceramics, Unsa Mining, Tourism, Energy, Ceramics, Forest Products, Electricity Production Industry, Kütahya, Türkiye
Gürsel Yanık
Affiliation:
Kütahya Dumlupınar University, Department of Geological Engineering, Kütahya, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author: Emre Kaçar; Email: emrekacar17@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A celadonitic clay deposit is located ∼40 km north-west of Yazlıca-Kütahya (Türkiye) and has promising reserves for ceramic production. To evaluate the potential use of this region, 10 representative clay samples were collected and characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), polarized-light microscopy (PM), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). According to the Chemical Index of Alteration and Chemical Index of Weathering, the celadonitic clay samples were formed by strong chemical alteration of the Kızıltepe volcanic rocks occurring in the study area. Based on XRD data, SEM-EDS data and chemical and thermal analysis results, the primary minerals present were celadonite-Al, montmorillonite and nontronite in the clay samples formed by the weathering of basaltic rocks. The clay samples were used in thermal and physical tests. Firing properties, including water absorption, dry shrinkage, firing shrinkage, total shrinkage and glaze adhesion, were determined. The white clay specimens are suitable for more decorative and less load-bearing applications, having high porosity and low strength. The green clay samples, however, are ideal for technical and industrial ceramics, having an extremely compact structure and high strength. The properties of these two clays are beneficial for application in different areas in terms of their mechanical and ceramic performance. Additionally, the representative green celadonitic clay samples were used in recipes for opaque, transparent and matte glazes, creating artistic glaze effects for pigments. Hence, the green clay samples could be used as a ceramic pigment.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location and simplified geological map of the Yazlıca celadonitic clay deposit (modified from Kaçar, 2023).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematic geological cross-section illustrating the locations of the clay samples collected from the study area (not to scale).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Cross-polarized OM image of a thin basalt section from the Kızılkaya volcanites, showing chloritized olivine and plagioclase.

Figure 3

Figure 4. XRD traces of white clays. Cel = celadonite; Kfs = K-feldspar; Mnt = montmorillonite; Qz = quartz; Tmag = Ti-magnetite (mineral name abbreviations after Warr, 2021).

Figure 4

Figure 5. XRD traces of green clays. Cel = celadonite; Kfs = K-feldspar; Non = nontronite; Qz = quartz; Tmag = Ti-magnetite (mineral name abbreviations after Warr, 2021).

Figure 5

Figure 6. XRD traces of the clay fraction of sample Y-5.

Figure 6

Table 1. Quantitative mineral analysis of the Yazlıca clay samples (wt.%).

Figure 7

Figure 7. SEM image of a montmorillonite from sample B-1 (100,000×).

Figure 8

Figure 8. SEM image of celadonite-Al crystals (100,000×) and EDS analysis of a celadonite crystal in sample Y-3.

Figure 9

Table 2. Chemical composition of the clay samples (wt.%).

Figure 10

Table 3. CIA and CIW values of the clay samples.

Figure 11

Figure 9. Comparison of firing effects on representative (a) B clay samples and (b) Y clay samples at various temperatures (850°C, 900°C and 950°C).

Figure 12

Figure 10. XRD traces of fired representative samples of (a) B clay and (b) Y clay. Cel = celadonite; Crs = cristobalite; Hem = hematite; Qz = quartz; Sa = sanidine; Spl = spinel (mineral name abbreviations after Warr, 2021).

Figure 13

Table 4. Quantitative analysis of representative B and Y fired clay samples (wt.%).

Figure 14

Figure 11. DSC curves of the white and green clay samples.

Figure 15

Figure 12. DSC-TG curves of sample B-1 from the upper clay level.

Figure 16

Figure 13. DSC-TG curves of sample Y-3 from the lower clay level.

Figure 17

Table 5. Endothermic (endo) and exothermic (exo) reaction temperatures obtained from DSC and mass losses determined according to TG analysis of Yazlıca clays.

Figure 18

Figure 14. FTIR spectrum of sample B-1.

Figure 19

Figure 15. FTIR spectrum of sample Y-3.

Figure 20

Table 6. Basic ceramic properties of green and white clay samples determined at 1150°C.

Figure 21

Figure 16. (a) Ternary diagram modified from Fiori et al. (1989) classifying ceramic-based clay bodies according to their mineralogical content (yellow circles = white clays; green circles = green clays). (b) Triangular diagram of clay-rich materials based on chemical content modified from Fabbri & Fiori (1985) (Cambodia data from Ngun et al., 2011).

Figure 22

Table 7. Ceramic properties of representative green clay (Y) sample added to existing masses.

Figure 23

Figure 17. The pigment effects of green clays (samples Y-1 to Y-5) added to the in-factory opaque glaze recipes (green clay additions of (a) 5 wt.%, (b) 10 wt.%, (c) 15 wt.% and (d) 20 wt.%).

Figure 24

Figure 18. The pigment effects of green clays (samples Y-1 to Y-5) added to the in-factory matte glaze recipes (green clay additions of (a) 5 wt.%, (b) 10 wt.%, (c) 15 wt.% and (d) 20 wt.%).

Figure 25

Figure 19. The pigment effects of green clays (samples Y-1 to Y-5) added to the in-factory transparent glaze recipes (green clay additions of (a) 5 wt.%, (b) 10 wt.%, (c) 15 wt.% and (d) 20 wt.%).

Figure 26

Table 8. Chemical analysis of the glazes used determining the pigment properties of the representative green clay.

Figure 27

Table 9. Harkort test results of the final products obtained by adding 5, 10, 15 and 20 wt.% green clay samples to opaque, matte and transparent glazes for ceramic pigments.