Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:16:51.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wavelength dependence of laser plasma interaction related to shock ignition approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

T. Pisarczyk*
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
S.Yu. Gus'kov
Affiliation:
P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute of RAS, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409 Moscow, Russian Federation
R. Dudzak
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
O. Renner
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
D. Batani
Affiliation:
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409 Moscow, Russian Federation Universite Bordeaux, CNRS, CEA, CELIA, Talence, France
T. Chodukowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
Z. Rusiniak
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
J. Dostal
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
N.N. Demchenko
Affiliation:
P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute of RAS, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
M. Rosinski
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
P. Parys
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
M. Smid
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic
Ph. Korneev
Affiliation:
P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute of RAS, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409 Moscow, Russian Federation
E. Krousky
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
S. Borodziuk
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
J. Badziak
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
L. Antonelli
Affiliation:
York Plasma Institute, University of York, York, UK
L. Gizzi
Affiliation:
Universita di Roma La Sapienza, Rome,Italy
G. Cristoforetti
Affiliation:
Universita di Roma La Sapienza, Rome,Italy
P. Koester
Affiliation:
Universita di Roma La Sapienza, Rome,Italy
Y. Maheut
Affiliation:
Universite Bordeaux, CNRS, CEA, CELIA, Talence, France
L. Volpe
Affiliation:
Universita di Roma La Sapienza, Rome,Italy
F. Baffigi
Affiliation:
Universita di Roma La Sapienza, Rome,Italy
T. Levato
Affiliation:
Universita di Roma La Sapienza, Rome,Italy
J. Skala
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
A. Zaras-Szydlowska
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
J. Trela
Affiliation:
Universita di Roma La Sapienza, Rome,Italy
D. Mancelli
Affiliation:
Universite Bordeaux, CNRS, CEA, CELIA, Talence, France
J. Ullschmied
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic
M. Pfeifer
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
L. Juha
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
M. Krus
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
J. Hrebicek
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
T. Medrik
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
K. Jungwirth
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic
M. Krupka
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00 Prague, Czech Republic
P. Pisarczyk
Affiliation:
Warsaw University of Technology, ICS, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author for correspondence: T. Pisarczyk, Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, 01-497 Warsaw, Poland, E-mail: tadeusz.pisarczyk@ifpilm.pl

Abstract

This paper provides a summary of recent research connected with the shock ignition (SI) concept of the inertial confinement fusion which was carried out at PALS. In the experiments, Cu planar targets coated with a thin CH layer were used. Two-beam irradiation experiment was applied to investigate the effect of preliminary produced plasma to shock-wave generation. The 1ω or 3ω main beam with a high intensity >1015 W/cm2 generates shock wave, while the other 1ω beam with the intensity below 1014 W/cm2 creates CH pre-plasma simulating the pre-compressed plasma related to SI. Influence of laser wavelength on absorbed energy transfer to shock wave was studied by means of femtosecond interferometry and measuring the crater volume. To characterize the hot electron and ion emission, two-dimensional (2D) Kα-imaging of Cu plasma and grid collector measurements were used. In single 1ω beam experiments energy transport by fast electrons produced by resonant absorption made a significant contribution to shock-wave pressure. However, two-beam experiments with 1ω main beam show that the pre-plasma is strongly degrading the scalelength which leads to decreasing the fast electron energy contribution to shock pressure. In both the single 3ω beam experiments and the two-beam experiments with the 3ω main beam, do not show any clear influence of fast electron transport on shock-wave pressure. The non-monotonic behavior of the scalelength at changing the laser beam focal radius in both presence and absence of pre-plasma reflects the competition of plasma motion and electron heat conduction under the conditions of one-dimensional and 2D plasma expansion at large and small focal radii, respectively.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Experimental set-up: (a) the construction and the geometry of irradiation of the two-layer target and (b) the location of the diagnostics on the PALS experiment.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Three-frame interferometric system.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Electron density distributions illustrating the time evolution of the ablative plasma expansion during the laser pulse interaction with the target at different focal spot radii in the pre-plasma absence.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Electron density distributions illustrating the time evolution of the ablative plasma expansion during the laser pulse interaction with the target at different focal spot radii in the presence pre-plasma.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Comparison of the maximal density gradient, the scalelength, and the maximal density obtained in the cases of absence and presence of the pre-plasma.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Comparison of the changes of total number of electrons in the cases of absence (a) and presence of the pre-plasma (b) for three characteristic times of the expansion.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. The craters and their shapes in two cross-sections for different focal spot radii obtained in cases absence (a) and presence (b) of the pre-plasma.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Comparison of: (a) N/Vcr parameter, (b) the crater volumes, and (c) the total electron number obtained in the case of absence (WP) and presence (PP) of the pre-plasma.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Electron density distributions illustrating the time evolution of the ablative plasma expansion during the laser pulse interaction with the target at different focal spot radii in the pre-plasma absence.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Electron density distributions illustrating the time evolution of the ablative plasma expansion during the laser pulse interaction with the target at different focal spot radii in the pre-plasma presence.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Comparison of the maximal density gradient, the scalelength, and the maximal density obtained in the cases of absence and presence of the pre-plasma.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Comparison of the changes of the total electron number in the cases of absence and presence of pre-plasma for three characteristic times of plasma expansion.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Comparison of the crater volumes Vcr and N/Vcr parameter obtained in the cases of absence and presence of pre-plasma.

Figure 13

Fig. 14. The scheme of the measurement of Cu Kα emission.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. Images of the Kα obtained in the case of without pre-plasma at the minimal focal spot radii for different laser energies: (a) 290 J and (b) 590 J.

Figure 15

Fig. 16. Dependences of the attenuation coefficient L as a function of fast electron energy.

Figure 16

Fig. 17. Dependences of the Kα on thickness of plastic for the cases of absence and presence of the pre-plasma.

Figure 17

Fig. 18. The influence of pre-plasma presence on the total population of photons depending on the focal spot radius of the laser beam.

Figure 18

Fig. 19. Conversion efficiency of the energy of 1ω main laser beam into the total energy carried by fast electrons as a function of the laser beam intensity.

Figure 19

Fig. 20. Results of the 2D fast electron emission imaging showing the influence of the pre-plasma on the total population of photons, depending on the plastic layer thickness in the two-layer target in the cases of absence and presence of pre-plasma.

Figure 20

Fig. 21. Results of 2D fast electron emission imaging, showing the influence of pre-plasma on the total population of photons depending on the focal spot radius of laser beam under the conditions of absence and presence of pre-plasma.

Figure 21

Fig. 22. Conversion efficiency of the 3ω main laser beam energy in the total energy carried by fast electrons as a function of laser beam intensity.

Figure 22

Fig. 23. Influence of the pre-plasma on: (a) the ion-collector signals measured at different angles and (b) angle distributions of the ion charge density for different focal spot radii.

Figure 23

Fig. 24. Influence of the pre-plasma on: (a) the ion-collector signals measured at different angles and (b) angle distributions of the ion charge density for different focal spot radii.

Figure 24

Fig. 25. The density (a) and temperature (b) distributions in the ablative plasma created by the main laser beam at the maximum of the laser pulse intensity.

Figure 25

Fig. 26. Distributions of the density (a) and temperature (b) in pre-plasma for the expansion moment of t = 400 ps.

Figure 26

Fig. 27. The density (a) and temperature (b) distributions after the time delay of t = 1.2 ns relate to the auxiliary laser pulse, created when affecting the main laser beam with a pre-plasma.

Figure 27

Table 1. Comparison of the experimental L with the 2DS in the cases of presence and absence of pre-plasma

Figure 28

Table 2. Comparison of numerical simulations of the total δtotal, resonant δres, and inverse bremsstrahlung δib absorption coefficients in the cases of pre-plasma absence and presence

Figure 29

Fig. 28. Comparison of the axial density profiles and the scale-length obtained in the cases of: (a) absence and (b) presence of pre-plasma.

Figure 30

Table 3. Comparison of the experimental values L with the 2DS in the cases of presence and absence of pre-plasma

Figure 31

Table 4. Comparison of numerical simulations of the total δtotal, resonant δres, and inverse bremsstrahlung δib absorption coefficients in the cases of pre-plasma absence and presence