Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:51:09.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Livestock Effects on Genetic Variation of Creosote Bushes in Patagonian Rangelands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2018

Cintia P. Souto*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio Ecotono-INIBIOMA-CONICET-CRUB, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, Bariloche (8400), Río Negro, Argentina
Mariana Tadey
Affiliation:
Laboratorio Ecotono-INIBIOMA-CONICET-CRUB, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, Bariloche (8400), Río Negro, Argentina
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Cintia P. Souto, Email: cintiap.souto@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Genetic diversity is the raw material for species’ persistence over time, providing the potential to survive stochastic events, as well as climate and/or human-induced environmental changes. Biodiversity in dry rangelands is decreasing due to intensification of livestock production, but its effects on the genetic diversity of the consumed biota have seldom been assessed. We examined livestock effects on the genetic diversity of two dominant creosote species of the Patagonian Monte Desert, Larrea divaricata and Larrea cuneifolia. We deployed competing hierarchical regression models to assess the relationship between genetic variation within natural populations as a function of increasing stocking rates on ten arid rangelands. These species exhibit similar levels and patterns of genetic structure, with high levels of both inbreeding and divergence among locations. We found that increased stocking reduces genetic variation and increases genetic subdivision between populations. Our results indicate that grazing pressures are impoverishing the gene pool of these dominant native species of the Monte Desert, decreasing the evolutionary potential of the primary plant producers and increasing the desertification risk for a vulnerable habitat. We highlight the importance of considering livestock as a major driver of genetic losses in dry rangelands under overgrazing pressure, especially given current forecasts of climate change.

Information

Type
Non-Thematic Papers
Copyright
© Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2018 
Figure 0

Table 1 Sampled paddocks, stocking rate with stocking level (SL) in brackets, mean dung density per paddock and mean plant species richness per paddock. Species (LC=Larrea cuneifolia; LD=Larrea divaricata) and their average characteristics: plant height and diameter (Diam.), browsing index (%) and proportion of reproductive individuals (Rep.)

Figure 1

Table 2 Model selection for livestock effects on genetic diversity: AE (mean effective number of alleles per locus), HE (expected heterozygosity – genetic diversity) and FST (inbreeding coefficient) in ten paddocks dominated by Larrea species from Patagonia Monte Desert. These models have stocking level and species as random factors. DF=degrees of freedom for each model; ΔAICc=delta Akaike information criterion among competing models corrected for small samples; wAICc=Akaike’s weight of evidence, representing the relative contribution of model i to explaining the observed pattern

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Bivariate relationship between plant height, diameter, size, reproduction and browsing percentage in ten paddocks in Monte Desert rangelands.

Figure 3

Table 3 Summary of average within-population genetic variation statistics of the ten studied paddocks of Larrea species. SL=stocking level; AE=mean number of effective alleles; HE=expected heterozygosity; %P=percentage of polymorphic loci; ACNG=average contribution to the next generation; Bn St=p-values of the sign test for evidence of a recent bottleneck under the infinite allele model; FIS=average fixation index; CI=confidence interval; FST=inbreeding coefficient. LC=Larrea cuneifolia; LD=Larrea divaricata. Bold values represent statistically significant p-values according to the Wilcoxon one-tail test for heterozygote excess. Standard error (SE) values in parentheses. *Statistically significantly different from 0

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Box plot of relative weight factors (RWF). The central square is the mean value, the box represents the standard deviation, the whiskers are 95% confidence intervals and the dashed lines represent mean values considering outliers.

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Bivariate relationship between population genetic parameters (AE, FST) and stocking rate in ten paddocks in Monte Desert rangelands.

Supplementary material: File

Souto and Tadey supplementary material

Souto and Tadey supplementary material 1

Download Souto and Tadey supplementary material(File)
File 116.6 KB