Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:58:21.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An insight into the morphological, biochemical and molecular diversity of GI tagged black scented rice, Chakhao landraces of Manipur, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2025

Konsam Sarika*
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Manipur Centre, Imphal, MN, India
Salam Gunamani Singh
Affiliation:
ICAR – Krishi Vigyan Kendra Imphal West, Lamphelpat, MN, India
Thokchom Repahini Chanu
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Manipur Centre, Imphal, MN, India
Sanii Lanah
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Manipur Centre, Imphal, MN, India
Chongtham Chinglen Meetei
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Manipur Centre, Imphal, MN, India
Artibashisha Hijam Pyngrope
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Manipur Centre, Imphal, MN, India
Ngangkham Umakanta
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Manipur Centre, Imphal, MN, India
E. Lamalakshmi Devi
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Sikkim Centre, Gangtok, SK, India
Harendra Verma
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Nagaland Centre, Medziphema, NL, India
Chingakham Premabati Devi
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Manipur Centre, Imphal, MN, India
Chanamthabam Basudha
Affiliation:
ICAR Research Complex for Northeastern Hill Region – Manipur Centre, Imphal, MN, India
*
Corresponding author: Konsam Sarika; Email: konsams@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The northeast region of India, part of the Indo–Burma biodiversity hotspot, is a vital reservoir of genetic diversity for agricultural crops, particularly rice. Chakhao, the black scented rice of Manipur, India is celebrated for its mild nutty flavour, distinctive aroma and high anthocyanin content. This study evaluated 22 economically significant Chakhao landraces using DUS characterization, along with biochemical and molecular profiling. Key findings revealed low amylose content (3.4–6.97%) and diverse grain types, predominantly short to medium slender. Anthocyanin concentrations varied widely, with certain genotypes surpassing 350 mg/100 g – levels even higher than those found in blueberries. Notably, landraces such as Chakhao_Bn-4, Chakhao_Ch-2, Chakhao_Cp-1 and Chakhao_IE-1 exhibited exceptional anthocyanin content (>390 mg/100 g), making them excellent candidates for future breeding programs. These lines also score the highest (9 – dark purple) in decorticated grains colour, a key trait for geographical indication (GI) status. Anthocyanin-related traits such as were the primary contributors to phenotypic diversity in the first three principal components, while structural and developmental traits influenced subsequent components. The study also revealed a striking lack of similarity in groupings based on morphological versus molecular data, as indicated by a low Baker’s Gamma correlation coefficient (0.034). Multivariate analysis integrating both data types highlighted substantial genetic and phenotypic diversity, reinforcing the necessity for comprehensive conservation strategies. The recent GI status of Chakhao has boosted global interest in Chakhao, prompting an initiate crop improvement program utilizing these landraces to drive economic resilience in marginal farming communities.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Illustration of diverse DUS parameters among the Chakhao genotypes. (A) Auricle anthocyanin colouration. (B) Leaf: anthocyanin colouration of collar. (C) Decorticated grain colour. (D) Lemma & palea colour.

Figure 1

Figure 2. PCA plots of individuals/genotypes explained in the first two PCs (A and B), scale of contribution of each variable in the first two PCs (C and D) and hierarchical clustering pattern (E and F) based on morphological data and molecular data, respectively.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Violin plot to show the distribution of (A) amylose (%); (B) anthocyanin (mg/100 g) content; (C) category of 1000 seeds weight (very low <15 g – 1, low 15–20 g – 2, medium 21–25 g – 3, high 26–30 g – 4 and very high >30 g – 5); (D) decorticated grain: shape (short slender – 1, short bold – 2, medium slender – 3, long bold – 4, long slender – 5, basmati type – 6, extra-long slender – 7); (E) decorticated grain: colour (white – 1, light brown – 2, variegated brown – 3, dark brown – 4, light red – 5, red – 6, variegated purple – 7, purple – 8, dark purple – 9) of the 22 Chakhao landraces.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Amplification profiles of markers RM-1341 and RM-474 showing high polymorphism among the 22 genotypes.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Population structure of 22 black rice Chakhao landraces. Two subpopulations were resolved with no genetic admixing. Population 1 consisted of three landraces all belonging to the upland hill ecosystem and Population 2 with both medium hill and upland ecosystem. Delta K (blue dots) with red line at the clear peak indicating the optimal number of clusters.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Comparison of dendrograms from morphological and molecular markers data, with morphological data grouped into 4 clusters (magenta, olive green, teal and purple branches) and molecular data into 3 clusters (magenta, green and blue branches) with entanglement Baker’s gamma correlation coefficient of 0.034, reflecting minimal topological similarity and divergent groupings between the datasets. The black lines in connecting the dendrograms correspond to mismatched genotypes.

Figure 6

Figure 7. (A) Joint hierarchical cluster analysis of individuals/genotypes using both the datasets of morphological and molecular markers, grouping into 3 clusters (magenta, green and blue branches boxes). (B) PCA plot of the first two principal components using combined data, highlighting the genotypes (in orange) that have the greatest influence on these components.

Supplementary material: File

Sarika et al. supplementary material 1

Sarika et al. supplementary material
Download Sarika et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 15.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sarika et al. supplementary material 2

Sarika et al. supplementary material
Download Sarika et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 17.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sarika et al. supplementary material 3

Sarika et al. supplementary material
Download Sarika et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 16.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sarika et al. supplementary material 4

Sarika et al. supplementary material
Download Sarika et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 14.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sarika et al. supplementary material 5

Sarika et al. supplementary material
Download Sarika et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 23.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sarika et al. supplementary material 6

Sarika et al. supplementary material
Download Sarika et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 14.8 KB