Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:56:18.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nowcasting of typhoon tracks based on LLM and RAG

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2025

Baichuan Peng
Affiliation:
Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
Youchao Jiang
Affiliation:
Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
Li Yao*
Affiliation:
Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
*
Corresponding author: Li Yao; Email: yaoli@shmtu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Accurate typhoon track nowcasting is vital for navigation and coastal disaster prevention. This research integrates a Large Language Model (LLM) with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology for typhoon path prediction. Leveraging LLMs as the predictive foundation, the approach tailors forecasts to individual typhoon characteristics. The methodology involves collecting satellite imagery, standardizing data, and employing optical flow methods to track typhoons and derive path coordinates. These coordinates are preprocessed and embedded into the LLM. RAG enhances the LLM’s predictive performance, enabling effective forecasting. Increasing typhoon-specific embedded data further improves accuracy. Using the FY-4 dataset, the method achieved an average absolute error of 10.78 km in 12-hour predictions. The study demonstrates that LLM-RAG integration excels in nowcasting.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Navigation
Figure 0

Figure 1. Diagram of RAG structure principle.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Question and answering based on RAG and LLM.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Binary image. (b) Image after boundary processing.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Changes in the tracked points marked during the typhoon within 36 h.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Deployment architecture of the prediction model.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Specific conversation process for embedding local files into an LLM.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Prediction results with direct querying method.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Comparison of real and predicted coordinates using various methods.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Prediction results with optimised querying method.

Figure 9

Table 1. Configuration of experimental platform

Figure 10

Table 2. Comparison of results for different prediction time intervals

Figure 11

Figure 10. Comparison of typhoon trajectory predictions and actual tracks across 2-h, 4-h, 7-h and 12-h intervals.

Figure 12

Table 3. Comparison of the results with other methods