Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:12:22.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biology and distribution of South Georgia icefish (Pseudochaenichthys georgianus) around South Georgia and Shag Rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2008

Sarah Clarke
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
William D.K. Reid
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Martin A. Collins*
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Mark Belchier
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
*
*corresponding author:macol@bas.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pseudochaenichthys georgianus is a member of the unique Channichthyidae family of fishes, which lack haemoglobin. The distribution, length-frequency and summer diet are described from 14 bottom trawl surveys undertaken in the summers between 1986 and 2006. Pseudochaenichthys georgianus (50–590 mm TL) were caught throughout the South Georgia shelf from depths of 76–370 m, but very few specimens (< 1%) were caught on the Shag Rocks shelf. Multiple cohorts were present during each survey and length-frequency analysis of these cohorts suggests that growth is fast during the first 3–4 years. Stomach contents analysis (2005 & 2006) indicated that P. georgianus is a pelagic or semi pelagic predator, with the summer diet dominated by Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Fish (channichthyids and notothenids) were also taken, but were a relatively minor part of the diet.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2008
Figure 0

Table I. Details of the fourteen groundfish surveys undertaken around South Georgia and Shag Rocks between 1986 and 2006.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Distribution (by estimated biomass) of Pseudochaenichthys georgianus around South Georgia and Shag Rocks from fourteen demersal trawl surveys undertaken between 1986 and 2006.

Figure 2

Table II. Biomass estimates (tonnes) of Pseudochaenichthys georgianus caught in demersal trawls around South Georgia and Shag Rocks, calculated by TrawlCI, with lower and upper 95% confidence intervals in parentheses.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Length frequency distribution (counts) of Pseudochaenichthys georgianus from the surveys carried out around South Georgia between 1986 and 2006, showing the size of fish sampled. Dotted lines indicate mean TL of each cohort determined by ‘RMIX’ analysis.

Figure 4

Table III. Mean total length (mm) of each Pseudochaenichthys georgianus age class determined by RMIX analysis. Standard errors are in parentheses.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Von Bertalanffy growth curve for P. georgianus, determined from the mean total lengths of each component (cohort) estimated by “RMIX”. Data were collected from 14 demersal surveys on the South Georgia shelf between 1986 and 2006. Larval and juvenile data was attained from Cumberland East Bay, South Georgia (August to December 2001–2005) and from the 2004 Dorada survey (February). Dotted line shows estimated growth.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Logistic curve for the size at maturity of male and female Pseudochaenichthys georgianus from around South Georgia. Solid lines indicate the estimated size at which 50% of the males and females reach maturity.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Index of relative importance (%) of prey items of Pseudochaenichthys georgianus split into separate size classes from around South Georgia. Data from January 2005 and 2006 pooled together.

Figure 8

Table IV. Diet composition of South Georgia icefish (Pseudochaenichthys georgianus) collected around South Georgia in January 2005 and 2006, expressed as % number (N),% mass (M),% frequency of occurrence (F) and a % index of relative importance (IRI) has been determined (see Cortes 1996).