Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:24:34.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of single and split-dose flubendazole treatment for the nematode parasite Trichostrongylus tenuis in experimentally infected grey partridges Perdix perdix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2012

D. PURDY
Affiliation:
Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hants SP6 1EF, UK
N. J. AEBISCHER*
Affiliation:
Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hants SP6 1EF, UK
C. DAVIS
Affiliation:
Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hants SP6 1EF, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Tel: 01425 652381. Fax: 01425 655848. E-mail: naebischer@gwct.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Different therapeutic regimes using flubendazole for the treatment of Trichostrongylus tenuis infection in experimentally infected grey partridges Perdix perdix were examined. Flubendazole dosages of 4, 8 and 20 mg/kg were administered orally as a single dose or split into 3 or 9 parts given over 9 days. The efficacy against adult worms in the caeca improved with dose rate. Split doses were at least as effective as single doses, which removed up to 83% of adult T. tenuis. A dose of 20 mg/kg administered on a daily basis over 3 or 9 days gave the best clearance of T. tenuis, resulting in a reduction of at least 95% in worm burden.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Trichostrongylus tenuis numbers found in the caeca of grey partridges following flubendazole treatment, together with the treatment means and 95% confidence intervals, plotted on a square-root scale. Each cross represents an individual partridge.

Figure 1

Table 1. Average number of Trichostrongylus tenuis per partridge (back-transformed from square-root scale, together with 95% confidence interval) in relation to (a) dose rate and (b) frequency of dosing

(Pairwise comparisons at different rates and different frequencies were carried out by contrast analysis, as were comparisons between low (4–8 mg/kg) and high (20 mg/kg) dose rates and between single and split (3 and 9 days) doses. All probabilities were assessed through 4999 randomization runs.)