Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T01:40:23.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Superomniphobic surfaces: Design and durability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2013

Arun K. Kota
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan; arunkota@umich.edu
Wonjae Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas; wonjae.choi@utdallas.edu
Anish Tuteja
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan; atuteja@umich.edu

Abstract

Surfaces that display liquid contact angles greater than 150° along with low contact angle hysteresis for liquids with both high and low surface tension values are known as superomniphobic surfaces. Such surfaces are of interest for a diverse array of applications, including self-cleaning surfaces, nonfouling surfaces, stain-free clothing, spill-resistant protective wear, drag reduction, and fingerprint-resistant surfaces. Recently, significant advances have been made in understanding the criteria required to design superomniphobic surfaces. In this article, we discuss the roles of surface energy, roughness, re-entrant texture, and hierarchical structure in fabricating superomniphobic surfaces. We also provide a review of different superomniphobic surfaces reported recently in the literature and emphasize the need for mechanical, chemical, and radiation durability of superomniphobic surfaces for practical applications. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the unresolved challenges in developing durable superomniphobic surfaces that define the scope for further improvements in the field.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a–c) A “sticky nonwetting surface” with a droplet of water displaying a very high contact angle (θ* >150°) and sticking to the surface tilted by 0°, 90°, and 180°, respectively, relative to the horizontal. Reprinted with permission from Reference 11. © 2005 Wiley. (d) A slippery super-repellent surface with a droplet of hexane displaying a low contact angle but sliding off when the surface is tilted by α = 3° relative to horizontal, indicating low contact angle hysteresis. Reprinted with permission from Reference 17. © 2011 Nature Publishing Group. (e) An impinging droplet of water bounces several times and rolls off of a conventional super-repellent surface tilted by 1° relative to the horizontal. Reprinted with permission from Reference 18. © 2000 IOP Publishing. Note: t, time.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a–b) Schematic of a liquid droplet in the Wenzel state and the Cassie–Baxter state, respectively, on a textured solid surface. (c–e) Schematics for a liquid droplet in the Cassie–Baxter state on a coarser textured surface, a finer textured surface, and a hierarchically textured surface, respectively. Note: θ*, apparent contact angle; θ, contact angle; ψ, local texture angle; R, radius of the feature; D, half the inter-feature spacing.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustrating the fabrication of hierarchically textured superomniphobic cotton textiles coated with silica micro- and nanoparticles. (b) A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the resulting hierarchically textured cotton textile. Insets show droplets of water and hexadecane (C16H34) displaying high contact angles on the surface. Reprinted with permission from Reference 3. © 2009 American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic illustrating the fabrication of a dual scale pillared superomniphobic structure of an aluminum-niobium alloy. (d–e) SEM images of the resulting surface with different inter-feature spacing. Reprinted with permission from Reference 53. © 2011 American Chemical Society. (f) An SEM image of the hierarchically textured superomniphobic aluminum surface. (g–h) Magnified SEM images showing the coarser texture and the finer texture, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Reference 55. © 2011 Royal Society of Chemistry. Note: APS, 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane; OAD, oblique angle magnetron sputtering deposition; FAP, fluoroalkyl phosphate.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the coarser texture, which consists of a stainless steel wire mesh dip-coated with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) + perfluorodecyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (fluorodecyl POSS) blend. (b) SEM image of the finer texture, which consists of electrospun beads of PMMA + fluorodecyl POSS blend. (c) SEM image of the hierarchically textured superomniphobic surface, which consists of electrospun beads of PMMA + fluorodecyl POSS blend on a stainless steel wire mesh. (d) Droplets of various low surface tension liquids displaying very high contact angles on the hierarchically textured surface. (e) A series of snapshots from a high-speed camera showing a droplet of heptane bouncing and rolling off of the hierarchically textured surface. Reprinted with permission from Reference 45. © 2012 Wiley.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) A schematic depicting the fabrication of superomniphobic surfaces with fluorinated nanofilaments of silanes. (b) A jet of toluene bouncing off of the superomniphobic surface, indicating its chemical durability. Reprinted with permission from Reference 57. © 2011 Wiley. (c) A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a superomniphobic polyester fabric fabricated by dip-coating in a solution of fluorodecyl POSS (perfluorodecyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane ) + fluoroalkyl silane in ethanol. (d) Droplets of water (yellow) and hexadecane (red) do not show change in contact angles upon exposing the superomniphobic fabric to concentrated sulfuric acid. (e) Contact angles (CAs) of the water and hexadecane droplets on the superomniphobic fabric as a function of the number of abrasion cycles. (f) Contact angles of various liquids before and after the superomniphobic fabric is subjected to 200 cycles of standard machine laundry. The fabrics withstand 6000 cycles of abrasion at 9 kPa and 200 cycles of standard machine laundry without decrease in contact angles, indicating good mechanical durability. Reprinted with permission from Reference 58. © 2011 Wiley. (g) SEM image of the hierarchically textured superomniphobic surface, which consists of a stainless steel wire mesh electrospun with cross-linked PDMS (poly(dimethylsiloxane)) + fluorodecyl POSS blend. (h–i) Various Newtonian liquids (from top to bottom: yellow—dimethyl formamide, light green—toluene, dark green—acetic acid, light blue—hexadecane, dark blue—hexylamine, red—PDMS) display high contact angles and easily bounce on the hierarchically textured superomniphobic surface. (j–l) The electrospun coatings remain unaffected even upon extended exposure to concentrated hydrochloric acid, concentrated sodium hydroxide, and PDMS, respectively. The stable plastron layer in (l) indicates that surface does not reconfigure even when exposed to an enthalpically favorable solvent. Reprinted with permission from Reference 46. © 2012 American Chemical Society. Note: TCMS, trichloromethylsilane; PFDTS, perfluorodecyl trichlorosilane.