Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T07:24:57.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lateral and depth patterns of soil organic carbon fractions in a mountain Mediterranean agrosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2014

L. QUIJANO*
Affiliation:
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEAD-CSIC), Zaragoza P.O. Box 13034, 50080, Spain
L. GASPAR
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK
A. NAVAS
Affiliation:
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEAD-CSIC), Zaragoza P.O. Box 13034, 50080, Spain
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: lquijano@eead.csic.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) can be affected by environmental factors such as land use change, type of vegetation, soil redistribution processes and soil management practices. Because data are scarce in mountain agroecosystems, improving knowledge on the relationships between land use, soil redistribution processes and SOC fractions is of interest, especially in rapidly changing Mediterranean landscapes. Typically, SOC is divided into two distinct carbon fractions: the active and decomposable fraction (ACF) with rapid turnover rates, which acts as a short-term carbon reservoir, and the stable carbon fraction (SCF) with lower turnover rates that acts as a long-term reservoir. In the present study SOC, ACF and SCF contents were measured by the dry combustion method and converted to inventories expressed as mass per unit surface area (kg/m2). The SOC distribution patterns were related to land use and soil redistribution processes in soil profiles along a representative mountain agroecosystem toposequence in northeast Spain. The soil depth profiles were identified as stable, eroded and depositional sites using fallout 137caesium (Cs). Significantly higher amounts of SOC were found in forest soils (36 ± 20·2 g/kg) compared to abandoned (21 ± 14·3 g/kg) and cultivated arable land (11 ± 6·3 g/kg), suggesting that cultivation decreases SOC content. In addition, stable soil profiles had significantly higher SOC content (42 ± 24·3 g/kg) than at depositional and eroded profiles (18 ± 14·5 and 17 ± 13·1 g/kg, respectively). A positive and statistically significant relationship between SOC and 137Cs inventories suggested that both are moved and associated with similar soil redistribution processes.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1.(a) Location of the study area in the central part of the pre-Pyrenees (NE Spain). (b) View of the study area, (c) and (d) the position, land use and number of soil samples of the soil sampling sites along the toposequence.

Figure 1

Table 1.Characteristics of the sampling points along the toposequence

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Linear regression between the SCF content (%) measured by the dry combustion method and SCF content (%) measured by the acid hydrolysis technique.

Figure 3

Table 2.Basic statistics of stone content (by weight), SOC, ACF and SCF content and inventory, bulk density and 137Cs activity and inventory for each sampling point. For sampled depth at each sampling point, see Table 1

Figure 4

Table 3.ANOVA tests of SOC, ACF and SCF content and inventory and ACF/SCF ratio by land use and soil redistribution

Figure 5

Fig. 3.Depth distribution of ACF and SCF content (%) in the soil profiles of the upper, middle and bottom slope parts of the study toposequence.

Figure 6

Fig. 4.Depth distribution of 137Cs inventory (Bq/m2), SOC, ACF and SCF contents (%) and ACF/SCF ratio by land use/land cover (forest and arable lands profiles).

Figure 7

Fig. 5.Depth distribution of 137Cs inventory (Bq/m2), SOC, ACF and SCF contents (%) and ACF/SCF ratio by soil redistribution processes (eroded and depositional profiles).

Figure 8

Table 4.ANOVA tests of SOC, ACF and SCF content, ACF/SCF, ACF/SOC, SCF/SOC ratios and 137Cs activity and inventory by land use and soil depth

Figure 9

Table 5.ANOVA tests of SOC, ACF and SCF contents, ACF/SCF, ACF/SOC, SCF/SOC ratios and 137Cs activity and inventory by soil redistribution and soil depth

Figure 10

Table 6.Pearson correlation coefficients between the content of SOC, SOC fractions and 137Cs activity and inventory

Figure 11

Fig. 6.(a) Box-plots of topsoil SOC contents (%) along the toposequence. (b) Box-plots of SOC contents (%) by soil type along the toposequence.