Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:37:28.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Warwickshire Group (Pennsylvanian) red-beds of the Canonbie Coalfield, England–Scotland border, and their regional palaeogeographical implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2010

NEIL S. JONES*
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK Saudi Aramco, PO Box 2001, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
DOUGLAS W. HOLLIDAY
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK 10 Tarn Court, Ilkley, West Yorkshire LS29 8UE, UK
JOHN A. McKERVEY
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK 16 Harvard House, Rivermead, Wilford Lane, Nottingham NG2 7RB, UK
*
†Author for correspondence: neil.jones@aramco.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Late Carboniferous red-beds, < 700 m thick, at outcrop and in the subsurface of the Canonbie Coalfield can be assigned to the Warwickshire Group. They are preserved within the axial part of the Solway Syncline and are divisible into the Eskbank Wood, Canonbie Bridge Sandstone and Becklees Sandstone formations. Sedimentation largely took place on a well-drained alluvial plain, characterized mainly by early, primary oxidation of the strata. Large, northerly-flowing braided river systems were common, with overbank and floodplain fines deposited lateral to the channels; soils formed during intervals of low sediment aggradation. The Canonbie succession includes some of the youngest Carboniferous rocks preserved in the UK. Correlation of the Eskbank Wood Formation is equivocal, but using petrographical, heavy mineral, zircon age dating and palaeocurrent data, the Canonbie Bridge Sandstone Formation can be unambiguously correlated with the Halesowen Formation of Warwickshire, the Pennant Sandstone Formation of South Wales and the offshore Boulton Formation. This suggests that southerly-derived detritus travelled considerable distances from the Variscan highlands of Brittany and/or central Germany across the southern North Sea and UK areas, to a position some hundreds of kilometres north of that previously recognized. The Becklees Sandstone Formation has much in common with the Salop Formation of the English Midlands. It appears to have no preserved equivalent elsewhere in the UK or in the UK sector of the southern North Sea but resembles stratigraphically higher parts of the southern North Sea succession seen in the Dutch sector.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1. General location map for the Canonbie Coalfield and the other UK coalfields mentioned in the text (modified from British Geological Survey, 1999). MSNFF – Maryport–Stublick–Ninety Fathom Fault system.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Geological map of the Canonbie Coalfield and adjacent areas. The positions of the main boreholes used in the study are also marked. (b) Close-up of the outcrop localities studied. Geological linework from BGS 50 000 scale Digmap data with additions from Picken (1988). The map falls within the National Grid 100 km square NY.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Isopach map showing the preserved thickness of Pennine Coal Measures and Warwickshire group strata along the Solway Syncline between the Canonbie and West Cumbrian coalfields. Redrawn with modifications from Map 14 of Chadwick et al. (1995, p. 88). Contours spaced every 200 metres. GF – Gilnockie Fault; MFS – Maryport Fault system; PCMG – Pennine Coal Measures Group; WG – Warwickshire Group.

Figure 3

Table 1. General metadata for boreholes used in this study

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Uninterpreted and (b) interpreted NW to SE seismic profile (ED-86-02) across part of the Canonbie Coalfield. The position of this line is shown on Figure 2. BSF – Becklees Sandstone Formation; Carb – Carboniferous; Hercyn u/c – Hercynian unconformity; PCMG – Pennine Coal Measures Group; PUCM – Pennine Upper Coal Measures Formation; SF – Stainmore Formation.

Figure 5

Table 2. General metadata for the Warwickshire Group thin-section and heavy mineral samples used in this study

Figure 6

Table 3. Heavy mineral data for the Canonbie Bridge Sandstone Formation (CBSF) and Becklees Sandstone Formation (BSF): (a) point-counted data, and (b) main ratios of heavy minerals with similar grain sizes and densities that determine the relative abundances of minerals with similar hydraulic and diagenetic behaviour

Figure 7

Figure 5. Lithostratigraphical classification of Pennsylvanian strata in the Canonbie area (based on Trueman & Weir, 1946; Ramsbottom et al. 1978 and Waters et al. 2007). The base of the Westphalian at Canonbie is marked by the presence of a non-sequence locally in parts of the basin centre and an angular unconformity on basin margins. C. – Cravenoceras; Lst – Limestone; U. – Upper.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Summary of the main features of the Warwickshire Group from the Canonbie Coalfield (Becklees Borehole). The side panel shows distribution plots of gamma-ray values for the Canonbie Bridge Sandstone and Becklees Sandstone formations and clearly shows that the Canonbie Bridge Sandstone is dominated by higher gamma-ray values, linked to the presence of abundant rock fragments. API – American Petroleum Institute; BHCS – Borehole Compensated Sonic log; GR – Gamma-Ray log; MB – Marine Band; PMCM – Pennine Middle Coal Measures Formation; PUCM – Pennine Upper Coal Measures Formation.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Correlation of the Warwickshire Group and upper part of the Pennine Coal Measures Group from boreholes in the Canonbie area. See Figure 2 and Table 1 for borehole locations. BHCS – Borehole Compensated Sonic log; cong – conglomerate; CPDL – Compensated Photo-density log; Fm. – Formation; Gp. – Group; GR – Gamma-Ray; mst – mudstone; SDU – BPB standard density unit; sst – sandstone.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Oxidized gley palaeosol overlain by remnants of oxidized coal. Pennine Upper Coal Measures Formation [3902 7714]. LM – lacustrine mudstone; OC – oxidized coal; OG – oxidized gley.

Figure 11

Figure 9. Composite sedimentological log of the Warwickshire Group succession exposed along the River Esk, Canonbie between [3917 7705] and [3930 6726].

Figure 12

Figure 10. Ternary diagram to show the classification of the Warwickshire Group sandstones. Classification scheme after Pettijohn, Potter & Siever (1987).

Figure 13

Figure 11. (a) Example of cross-bedding within the channel facies; (b) Line drawing of (a). Cross-bedding foresets dip to the right and set bounding surfaces, marked by thicker lines, dip to the left. There is a structural dip of about 18° down to the south at this locality. Canonbie Bridge Sandstone Formation, west bank of the River Esk [3918 7690]. View looking SW. Height of visible part of person is 1.7 m.

Figure 14

Table 4. Petrographic and heavy mineral characteristics of the two main sandstone types from the Warwickshire Group of the Canonbie area

Figure 15

Figure 12. Thin-section photomicrographs of the Canonbie Bridge Sandstone Formation (Sample NJN101) in plane polarized light to show the common occurrence of lithic rock fragments (RF). Also present are quartz grains (Q). Scale bar is 0.5 mm across.

Figure 16

Figure 13. Thin-section photomicrograph of the Becklees Sandstone Formation (Sample NJN99) in plane polarized light. Quartz (Q) forms the dominant detrital component, with minor feldspar (F) and rock fragments (RF). Rhombs of dolomite cement (D) can also be seen in places. Scale bar is 0.5 mm across.

Figure 17

Table 5. Characteristics of the facies associations and facies recognized from the Warwickshire Group of the Canonbie area

Figure 18

Figure 14. Example of the lacustrine mudstone facies. Note the presence of parallel lamination marked by preferential splitting of laminae. Lens cap for scale is 5 cm across. Eskbank Wood Formation, River Esk [3915 7705].

Figure 19

Figure 15. Lacustrine limestone facies forming the resistant, lighter coloured bed. Lens cap for scale is 5 cm across. Eskbank Wood Formation, River Esk [3915 7705]. LL – lacustrine limestone; LM – lacustrine mudstone.

Figure 20

Figure 16. Example of a pseudogley palaeosol with common pedogenic listric surfaces and lighter coloured goethitic mottling (arrowed) along former roots. Eskbank Wood Formation, River Esk [3922 7693]. Lens cap for scale is 5 cm across. For a colour version of this figure see online Appendix at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo.

Figure 21

Figure 17. Example of a vertic brunified palaeosol (B horizon). Note the prominent curved ‘slickensided’ surfaces (arrowed) overlying nodular accumulations of pedogenic carbonate (calcrete) in the underlying C horizon. A brunified alluvial palaeosol (BA) is present above. Eskbank Wood Formation, River Esk [339174 557705]. Lens cap for scale is 5 cm across. For a colour version of this figure see online Appendix at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo.

Figure 22

Figure 18. Example of a calcimorphic palaeosol (calcrete), with coalesced carbonate glaebules. Eskbank Wood Formation, River Esk [3915 7705]. Lens cap for scale is 5 cm across. For a colour version of this figure see online Appendix at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo.

Figure 23

Figure 19. Palaeocurrent rose diagrams for channel facies from (a) Canonbie Bridge Sandstone Formation and (b) Becklees Sandstone Formation. These data are restored with respect to structural dip. Data for the Becklees and Glenzierfoot boreholes are derived from analysis of dipmeter data. No. – number of readings; PCL – primary current lineation; VM – vector mean.

Figure 24

Figure 20. Example of a vertic brunified palaeosol, with complex brecciated, desiccated fabric (arrowed). This view is subparallel to bedding. Canonbie Bridge Sandstone Formation, River Esk [3944 7636]. Lens cap for scale is 5 cm across. For a colour version of this figure see online Appendix at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo.

Figure 25

Figure 21. Example of a calcimorphic palaeosol (calcrete), showing scattered, subvertical carbonate glaebules (white). Becklees Sandstone Formation, River Esk [3930 7626]. Hammer head is 0.2 m in length. For a colour version of this figure see online Appendix at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo.

Figure 26

Figure 22. Proposed chronostratigraphical correlation of the Warwickshire Group from the Canonbie area with other areas mentioned in the text. The stratigraphy presented here is taken from a compilation of data presented in Powell et al. (2000) and Waters et al. (2007). Grey area shows the proposed correlation between the Boulton, Pennant Sandstone and Halesowen formations with the Canonbie succession. Fm. – Formation; Gp. – Group; MB – Marine Band; MBF – Millyeat Beds Member; Mbr. – Member; PMCM – Pennine Middle Coal Measures Formation; PUCM – Pennine Upper Coal Measures Formation; SST – sandstone; SMCM – Scottish Middle Coal Measure Formation; SUCM – Scottish Upper Coal Measures Formation; SWUCM – South Wales Upper Coal Measures Formation; WAWK – Warwickshire Group; WSF – Whitehaven Sandstone Formation; WSM – Whitehaven Sandstone Member.

Figure 27

Figure 23. Heavy mineral cross-plots for (a) Apatite–Tourmaline with Rutile–Tourmaline (ATi–RuTi), (b) Chrome-spinel–Zircon with Monazite–Zircon (CZi–MZi) and (c) Garnet–Zircon with Monazite–Zircon (GZi–MZi) for the Warwickshire Group from the Canonbie area. Data were obtained from samples NJN98 and 99 (Becklees Sandstone) and NJN100, 101 and 102 (Canonbie Bridge Sandstone). There is considerable variation in the ATi values (11–78), reflecting variable amount of apatite dissolution during sediment transport and storage. The rocks of the Canonbie Bridge Sandstone have higher ATi (62–78) than the Beckless Sandstone (42–45). All other indices GZi, MZi and CZi are low (0–7) with the Canonbie Bridge Sandstone characterized by slightly higher MZi, but similar CZi and GZi, in comparison to the Beckless Sandstone.

Figure 28

Figure 24. Cross-plot of Chrome-spinel–Zircon with Monazite–Zircon (CZi–MZi) to compare the data from Canonbie with other examples of Westphalian sandstones from the onshore and offshore UK (data derived from Hallsworth, 1992; Hallsworth, pers. comm. 2001; Hallsworth & Chisholm, 2000; Hallsworth et al. 2000; Morton, Hallsworth & Moscariello, 2005). The Canonbie data are distinct from the southern North Sea Ketch and Cleaver formations (which generally have high CZi, low MZi values) and the onshore Mexborough suite (which is characterized by a much larger range of MZi and CZi), suggesting that the Canonbie rocks are not derived from the same source. There would appear to be some similarity between the Canonbie rocks and the Halesowen Formation (Daleswood Borehole). Bh – Borehole; CZi – Chrome-spinel–Zircon; Fm. – Formation; MZi – Monazite–Zircon; sst – Sandstone; SNS – southern North Sea.

Figure 29

Figure 25. Garnet compositions expressed in terms of the relative abundances of almandine plus spessartine (AS), pyrope (P) and grossular (G) end-members for (a) the Canonbie Bridge Sandstone Formation, (b) Mexborough Rock (data from Hallsworth & Chisholm 2000), (c) Halesowen Formation (data from Hallsworth et al. 2000) and (d) combined plot where only samples with greater than 5 % spessartine are shown to distinguish garnet populations with relatively high spessartine from those which are almandine-rich. The Canonbie Bridge Sandstone Formation is predominantly characterized by high almandine+spessartine compositions with low grossular and minor pyrope. There is one anomalous garnet with considerably higher pyrope, suggesting that there is some heterogeneity in the garnet population. The garnet compositions compare favourably with those published for the Mexborough Rock and Halesowen Formation. (a) Canonbie: 22 samples from NJN101 & CAN1; (b) Mexborough Rock: 50 samples Eh14773 (Dalton Rock); (c) Halesowen Formation: 50 samples from the Daleswood Farm Borehole, at 216 m downhole depth, and (d) Canonbie (> 5 % spessartine = 21 out of 22), Halesowen (> 5 % spessartine = 23 out of 50), Mexborough (> 5 % spessartine = 16 out of 50). CAN1, Eh14773 and NJN101 are samples registered at the British Geological Survey.

Supplementary material: File

Jones Supplementary Material

Colour Figures.zip

Download Jones Supplementary Material(File)
File 16.7 MB