Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T02:48:30.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resorcinol-formaldehyde derived carbon xerogels: A promising anode material for lithium-ion battery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2017

Manohar Kakunuri
Affiliation:
Centre for Carbon Materials, International Advance Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials, Hyderabad 500005, Telangana, India
Chandra Shekhar Sharma*
Affiliation:
Creative & Advanced Research Based on Nanomaterials (CARBON) Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 502285, Telangana, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: cssharma@iith.ac.in

Abstract

Organic gels obtained by sol–gel polycondensation reaction followed by subcritical drying in ambient conditions are termed as xerogels which are pyrolyzed to yield carbon xerogels. Resorcinol formaldehyde (RF) derived carbon xerogels have received considerable attention due to their higher carbon yield and ease of tuning their microstructure and therefore physiochemical properties. Recent advances in the synthesis of carbon xerogels have allowed porous as well as non-porous but large external surface area morphologies. Further efforts have been made about increasing the surface area by activation or changing the microstructure by doping with foreign elements. These advances in the area of carbon xerogels synthesis led to their use as high performance anode materials for Li ion batteries recently. This review summarizes these recent studies on electrochemical performance of carbon xerogels to clearly demonstrate their potential as high capacity anode material for Li ion batteries. Notably, given the potential not only for Li ion batteries but also for latest sodium-ion batteries and super-capacitors, this review provides a much needed attention of scientific community to so far unnoticed carbon xerogel materials.

Information

Type
REVIEW
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Microstructure of (a) hard carbon; (b) soft carbon; (c) graphitic carbon and corresponding lithium insertion mechanism in inset.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Schematic of different carbon gels synthesis process and digital image of carbon xerogel block.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Schematic of the mechanism of polymerization of resorcinol and formaldehyde. Reproduced with the permission from Al-Muhtaseb et al.18

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Schematic of inverse emulsification process.

Figure 4

TABLE I. Effect of inverse emulsification process parameters on morphology of RF gels.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. (a) Schematic of electrospraying set up45; (b) SEM image of carbon nanoparticles45; (c) Schematic of electrospinning setup; (d) SEM image of RF-PMMA derived carbon fibers.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. Schematic diagram of replica molding to fabricate 3D microposts arrays in RF xerogel. Reprinted with permission from Microfabrication of Carbon Structures by Pattern Miniaturization in Resorcinol-Formaldehyde Gel, Chandra S. Sharma, Ankur Verma, Manish M. Kulkarni, Devendra K. Upadhyay, and Ashutosh Sharma, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2(8), 2193–2197 (2010). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. (a) SEM image, (b) TEM image of carbon xerogel nanoparticles.19

Figure 8

FIG. 8. Cyclic performance of (a) interconnected carbon xerogel nanoparticles,19 (b) carbon xerogel nanofibers at a current density of 37.2 mA/g.50

Figure 9

TABLE II. A comparison of specific capacity for various organic gel derived carbon materials.

Figure 10

FIG. 9. TEM image of (a) carbon xerogel, (b) catalytically graphitized carbon xerogel; cyclic performance of (c) carbon xerogel and (d) graphitic carbon xerogel.77