Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T00:11:27.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Affect in sociolinguistic style

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2021

Teresa Pratt*
Affiliation:
San Francisco State University, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Teresa Pratt San Francisco State University Humanities Building 1600 Holloway Ave San Francisco, CA 94132, USA tpratt@sfsu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues for a focus on affect in sociolinguistic style. I integrate recent scholarship on affective practice (Wetherell 2015) and the circulation of affective value (Ahmed 2004b) in order to situate the linguistic and bodily semiotics of affect as components of stylistic practice. At a Bay Area public arts high school, ideologically distinct affects of chill or high-energy are co-constructed across signs and subjects. I analyze a group of cisgender young men's use of creaky voice quality, speech rate, and bodily hexis in enacting and circulating these affective values. Crucially, affect co-constructs students’ positioning within the high school political economy (as college-bound or not, artistically driven or not), highlighting the ideological motivations of stylistic practice. Building on recent scholarship, I propose that a more thorough consideration of affect can deepen our understanding of meaning-making as it occurs in everyday interaction in institutional settings. (Affect, political economy, embodiment, bricolage, voice quality, speech rate, high school)

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of regression model predicting voice quality (creaky or non-creaky).

Figure 1

Figure 1. By-speaker plot of creak rate, posture transitions, and pause rate, ordered by increasing creak rate.

Figure 2

Table 2. By-speaker rates of creak, speech tempo, and hexis (ordered by decreasing creak rate). Excerpts in italics were uttered by others in the sample about that speaker; otherwise, excerpts are uttered by the speaker.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Sketch-converted video stills of Trevor, Michael, and Trent (left to right) in their most frequent seated position during interviews.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Sketch-converted video stills of Brad, Rueben, and Josh (left to right) in their most frequent seated position during interviews.

Figure 5

Figure C1. Percent creak across all phrases by speaker.

Figure 6

Figure C2. Range of phrasal speech rate for young men, ordered by increasing mean percent speech rate across all phrases.

Figure 7

Figure C3. Range of phrasal pause proportion for young men, ordered by increasing mean pause proportion across all phrases.