The Algerian Red Crescent, stained with the blood of our martyrs, will continue to rise in our brilliant sky of stars from the twilight of servitude until the dawn of our liberation.
—Omar Boukli-Hacène, president, Algerian Red Crescent, 1957
In the late 1950s, at the height of the Algerian War of Independence, the National Liberation Front (FLN) published a pamphlet entitled “Aspects of the Algerian Revolution.” The cover features four armed National Liberation Army (ALN) soldiers standing over a map of the country and gazing attentively into the distance. These men are poised to protect and defend their nation as they await the challenges ahead. The pamphlet, which has a particular emphasis on health, includes photos of an Algerian doctor setting up a temporary medical station in the countryside. In one of these, above the caption “Care is dispensed to both combatants and civilians during organized ALN visits,” men, women, and children crowd around the physician, waiting their turn to be examined. A second set of images presents uniformed Algerian nurses with Red Crescent armbands, in what appears to be mountainous terrain, preparing a sterile bandage for an older man. Another photograph depicts nine young women gathered around a male instructor with pens and notebooks in their hands; the heading explains that after the completion of these “nursing courses,” they would “join the ALN units.”Footnote 1
Sustained military violence and deliberate attempts by the French colonial state to restrict the availability of pharmaceutical products and medical materials for those involved in the anticolonial struggle presented the FLN with one of its most pressing issues. The Algerian leadership understood that concern for the population's welfare conveyed a powerful message, and it hoped to demonstrate an organized and vibrant medical sector. Nationalists were committed to protecting their soldiers and the Algerian people and seized the language of health care to argue “that they could care for the welfare of ‘their’ populations better than [could an] alien colonial government.”Footnote 2 They also recognized the value of being regarded as humanitarians by an increasingly sympathetic international audience and developed strategies to accomplish that goal.
While the literature on the Algerian war continues to expand, few studies have focused on medicine and on the health care organizations that the FLN created specifically to bolster nation–state claims and solicit international aid.Footnote 3 Throughout the war, both the French and the Algerians launched extensive medical and health care propaganda campaigns. While the colonial administration developed health-related strategies to simultaneously win over the population and isolate the rebels, Algerians nationalists created their own health care services, as portrayed in the previously mentioned pamphlet, to counteract these aims.
This article investigates Algerian health care organizations and argues that they were deployed for both social and political ends. The first section concentrates on the development of the FLN–ALN domestic Services de Santé (hereafter referred to as the health-services division) from 1954 to 1957, illustrating the nationalists’ commitment to the civilian population and establishing the context for understanding their broader political strategy and its connection to international developments in subsequent years. The second section examines the Algerian Red Crescent (CRA), a de facto national Red Cross society that nationalists established to supplement their domestic health care efforts and to add an international dimension to them.
The CRA, an instrumental component of the Algerian anticolonial movement, has gone unnoticed in the scholarship. It demands attention as one of the most active and vocal organizations that advocated for Algerians throughout the war and that employed the language of humanitarianism to the nationalists’ political advantage. Drawing upon original research, including underutilized Algerian sources, I show that the FLN–ALN health-services division and the CRA found ways to convert Algerian health care problems and medicine shortages into international concerns. The scholarly literature on modern imperialism has explored at length how colonial regimes manipulated health and medicine; this article argues that Algerian nationalists also used the provision of medicine and health care to gain the support of the local population and to sway international public opinion.Footnote 4
ALGERIAN HEALTH CARE SERVICES
From its inception, the FLN recognized the strong correlation between medical care and civilian support, yet the first two years of the war (1954–56) were extremely challenging for the Algerian health-services division due to poor coordination among the political leadership. Despite FLN claims that its participants agreed on the methods it should pursue to achieve independence, its leaders were divided about the direction the war should take.Footnote 5 The initial FLN heads shared an end goal but faced logistical challenges related in part to their dispersed geographic locations; they thus struggled to establish a centralized health-service organization that would adequately address the needs of both their soldiers and the civilian constituency they claimed to represent.
During this period, communication between different regions of the country was limited, and the ALN did not have standard procedures or trained medical personnel upon whom to rely, resulting in what Mohammed Harbi, a former Algerian political activist, calls a “relatively inefficient” health system.Footnote 6 In December 1954, fewer than 1,900 doctors in Algeria (of whom only seventy-five were Algerian) served a population of roughly nine million Muslim Algerians and one million Europeans and pieds-noirs.Footnote 7 As a result, FLN and ALN participants worked with limited expertise and made creative use of inadequate supplies.Footnote 8
Two important events, the May 1956 strike (La grève du 19 Mai 1956) and the August 1956 Soummam Congress, transformed the FLN–ALN health-services division, which reported directly to the army, and enabled nationalists to argue that they were prepared to assume responsibility for the people's welfare.Footnote 9 In the spring of that year, the General Union of Muslim Algerian Students (Union Générale des Etudiants Muselmans Algériens, UGEMA) organized what turned out to be an extremely effective recruiting tool for the wartime medical division and inaugurated a new phase of the conflict. On 19 May, the union called on Algerian students to walk away from their classrooms and devote themselves to national service. It questioned the nature of their coursework and the value of their diplomas in such a time of crisis, when their “mothers, spouses, [and] sisters are raped, when [their] elderly die by machinegun fire, bombs, and napalm.”Footnote 10 The UGEMA urged students in all disciplines to suspend their studies immediately and indefinitely, “desert university benches,” and commit themselves to “more urgent and glorious tasks.”Footnote 11
Hundreds of students joined the maquis in the spring of 1956, a moment that doctor and historian Ahmed Benkhaled calls “a crucial turning point in the history of the Algerian health services during the national liberation struggle.”Footnote 12 In 1956, there were only 360 Algerians enrolled at the University of Algiers and, of that group, only 128 were studying medicine.Footnote 13 Medical students’ knowledge and skills were in high demand, especially considering how few of them there were, and any student was a valuable asset.
Many medical students had not finished their training, but they were a welcome addition to FLN ranks.Footnote 14 A number of Algerian students pursuing medical degrees abroad responded to the UGEMA call. In Lyon, Bensalem Djamel-Eddine (Bin Salim Jamal al-Din) and some of his fellow classmates interrupted their coursework to return to Algeria. In December 1956, Djamel-Eddine took a boat to Tunisia, where he practiced medicine in Sousse for several months and worked closely with Dr. Mohammed Nekkache (Naqqash), a member of the Algerian health commission in the east. In May 1957, he entered into Algeria and began working in Wilaya 1.Footnote 15
Doctors and nurses supporting the nationalist effort helped train new recruits for propaganda and basic medical care in clandestine safe houses and other secret locations.Footnote 16El Moudjahid, an FLN newspaper that was printed in both French and Arabic, reported that the ALN took the time to instruct an elite cadre of medical personnel before sending them to the maquis. Out of a group of roughly 300 soldiers preparing for combat, forty were selected to receive intensive instruction in triage and basic surgical procedures—skills “the struggle required,” noted the ALN supervisor. After one month, they were rotated back out to the larger group, and forty more recruits would start their medical training.Footnote 17 This degree of preparation was rare but it speaks to the concerted FLN effort to bolster its medical presence in Algeria as well as to publicize that presence.
The second major development in health care recruitment and organization in 1956 was the Soummam Congress, which began on 20 August in the Soummam valley. The main impetus behind the congress was political. The FLN needed to unite its different leadership factions, generate a coherent strategy, and refine its goals. This summit, attended by sixteen delegates from around the country, established political rule over the organization's military wing and prioritized the internal leadership over the external one operating in Cairo.Footnote 18 The attendees issued a platform outlining cease-fire and negotiation conditions; the role of women and youth; and the FLN's relationship with peasants, trade unions, the Jewish community, communists, and pieds-noirs. They also divided Algeria into six wilāyāt or provinces for organizational purposes and established new executive hierarchies throughout the country.
After the fall of 1956, the FLN's wartime health care system operated within the new territorial infrastructure of the wilāyāt, each of which was further divided into zones, regions, sectors, and finally subsectors. Each health-services unit within this hierarchy was expected to maintain detailed reports on the patients it treated and submit them to the unit above it. Several accounts depict the ALN–FLN health-services division as functioning relatively smoothly during this phase, with medical personnel following the proper chain of command.Footnote 19 They suggest that doctors filled out patient reports and sent many wounded individuals for further treatment or rehabilitation abroad.Footnote 20
However, the system described in these sources is an idealized version of how the medical sector actually functioned.Footnote 21 One doctor remembers that “people did what they could” and that the health care services “were not dependable.”Footnote 22 Another activist explains that the unit's location greatly impacted the amount of supplies it received. For example, Mustafa ʿAmirush, who fought primarily in Wilaya IV, recalls that medical units closest to the Moroccan and Tunisian borders were the most successful in obtaining essential supplies.Footnote 23 Others remember that the health-services division during this period was not very visible and that it operated on a day to day basis.Footnote 24 These descriptions challenge the picture described in the official FLN documents and highlight the discrepancy between the leadership's intentions and the reality experienced by many maquisards.
Attempting to construct a viable medical sector, the FLN–ALN issued strict instructions about the aims of the health branch and how maquisards were expected to behave. According to a doctor who served in Wilaya IV, the four main goals of the wartime health division were to conduct regular visits to soldiers; prevent infectious diseases; treat combatants, refugees, and political militants; and, finally, care for wounded civilians.Footnote 25 Accomplishing these tasks and obtaining the necessary supplies required cooperation between different military, political, and social groups.
The French military seized some of these reports as they circulated clandestinely and noticed that part of the new Algerian health initiative targeted rural and remote areas. In June 1957, General Raoul Salan discovered that the FLN–ALN health-services division was treating not only soldiers but also Algerian civilians. Mobile medical teams passed through villages and the countryside—as did the French Sections Administratives Spécialisées—offering treatment that was previously unavailable. Salan noted what a “psychological effect” the “rebel commanders” could have on the rural population. He thought offering medical treatment was one of the “best FLN propaganda tools” he had seen to date and commented on the important moral dimension of this kind of work.Footnote 26 The nationalists intended to win support through their health programs and, to borrow an expression from Sandra Sufian, thereby “heal the land and the nation.”Footnote 27 Given their limited resources and personnel, it is difficult to assess the full impact of FLN–ALN medical offerings in isolated parts of Algeria. However, French officials and army generals had to acknowledge that they were not the only players on this field.
The psychological effect of medical care on the civilian population thus became strategically significant for Algerian nationalists. In one FLN–ALN service note, Lakhdar, a captain in Wilaya IV, reminded his personnel to “periodically visit and treat the population.”Footnote 28 In reports about morale and social conditions, medical officers often commented on their successes winning over the Algerian people. “Mahmoud,” an ALN member in Wilaya IV, wrote that “the population always receives [doctors and nurses] with great satisfaction. They never pass through a village without providing care to a large number of children and the elderly. The people know the difficulties we face in procuring medication and appreciate our efforts even more.”Footnote 29 Monthly reports issued by the FLN and ALN noted that medical care was “an excellent psychological weapon to use against the French” and observed “how happy civilians were to see Arab physicians” caring for and encouraging them.Footnote 30
One doctor explained that the FLN deployed Algerian doctors to areas that might benefit from medical propaganda.Footnote 31 They tried to reassure the population that the nationalist organization could “take care of them” and stressed that its leaders were “interested in their lives” and would “not let them die” in poor conditions.Footnote 32 Similar to strategies employed in other colonial contexts in Africa and the Middle East, Algerian political leaders tried to equate its own medical services with those of a future sovereign state and employed a social welfare framework to show that they “[spoke] for the masses and their well-being.”Footnote 33
INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL AMBITIONS: THE ALGERIAN RED CRESCENT
From the beginning of the anticolonial movement, the FLN attended to both local and international dimensions of the Algerian struggle for independence, and this attention also applied to the medical division. The student strike and the Soummam Congress contributed to establishing a more sophisticated domestic health sector, even while the brutal conditions of war made it difficult to adequately meet all of the population's needs. In 1957, the nationalists concentrated on expanding their health care system beyond Algeria. They had already received assistance from doctors in the newly sovereign states of Morocco and Tunisia; throughout the conflict, in the latter country especially, hospitals regularly reserved beds for wounded Algerians.Footnote 34 They wanted to build upon Arab alliances and viewed the internationalization of medical aid beyond these spheres as a critical tactic in gaining additional support.
The FLN worked closely with Arab and Eastern Bloc governments to supplement its health care instruction efforts. In December 1958, Egyptian president Jamal ʿAbd al-Nasir invited a group of Algerian nurses to participate in an internship at the Egyptian Red Crescent. He told El Moudjahid he was “convinced that if a young Algerian girl is determined to fight for her country, her faith will be rewarded, and God will bestow victory and dignity upon Algeria.”Footnote 35 The nationalists also reached out to the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia for help. These governments developed a system that allowed the ALN to regularly send its wounded to treatment facilities abroad. Several articles in El Moudjahid describe trips that Algerian soldiers made in order to receive treatment unavailable in the Maghrib.Footnote 36 Another Algerian doctor recalled the important role that Eastern countries played in providing treatment and physical therapy for the wounded.Footnote 37 The FLN considered this to be a “concrete gesture” that signified a larger commitment to independent Algeria.Footnote 38 It can also be interpreted as an instance of Cold War alliances in the global South such as those Matthew Connelly and Odd Arne Westad have analyzed.Footnote 39
The nationalists wanted to expand their support network further to include organizations with international ties; one already active in Algeria was the French Red Cross (CRF), a national society of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) based in Geneva. According to ICRC regulations, each sovereign country was permitted one national society linked to the international organization to carry out humanitarian activities according to local needs. Though associated with the founding branch in Geneva and expected to uphold the principles of neutrality and impartiality, national societies approved by the central organization were not under its direct authority and maintained their own staff.Footnote 40 In theory, the CRF in Algeria could have been a place for French and Algerian doctors to join forces openly, where patients of all backgrounds could feel safe from both government and FLN attacks. Instead, it found itself torn between a colonial mission and a humanitarian one and in fact systematically assumed a position of sympathy for the metropole.
During the decades preceding the war for independence, the CRF in Algeria organized national health days, contributed aid to tubercular North African patients in France, assisted veterans of World War II and Indochina, and matched Algerian host families with young French missionaries for the Christmas and New Year holidays.Footnote 41 The evidence suggests that during this time the CRF maintained a low profile and was not a target of significant criticism from either the European or Algerian population. But this changed after 1954, when FLN representatives accused it of being “a vessel of colonialism” and “a puppet of the French authorities,” thrusting it into the national and international spotlights.Footnote 42
Internal CRF reports from the start of the war in November 1954 until late 1956 rarely mentioned the conflict or even any increased demand for medical services in Algeria.Footnote 43 A short internal letter from 1956 noted that the CRF intended to collect funds for and assist “those hit by the events.”Footnote 44 But the national society's annual reports for 1954 and 1955 focused primarily on its relief efforts for the September 1954 earthquake in Orléansville. The only indication in these reports that the CRF was affected by the war are references to “insurrectional conditions” and to the French army's need for aid, suggesting a political orientation toward the colonial authorities.Footnote 45 The CRF monthly magazine continued to publish interest stories about French physicians who served with the colonial military in Indochina and who debated the disorder of medical infrastructure in times of war.Footnote 46 The CRF appeared to carry on as though nothing transformative in Algeria was taking place.
In 1957, the CRF began to refer more regularly, albeit still euphemistically, to “the events” and to acknowledge the reality of a “pacification campaign,” French code for the war.Footnote 47 It was also forced to expand its programming as the conflict created more need for medical assistance throughout the country. The 1957 annual report, in contrast to those from the first three years of the war, stressed the organization's social and humanitarian spirit and its commitment to helping “victims of the calamitous events . . . regardless of race or religion.”Footnote 48 While the organization's official discourse asserted its enthusiasm for helping all victims of the war, in practice it maintained a stronger working relationship with the French army than with the FLN and devoted significant resources to assisting wounded French soldiers.Footnote 49 Accounts in newspapers and magazines such as Le Monde, L'Echo d'Alger, and Vie et Bonté (a monthly CRF magazine) seem to suggest that a primary objective of the CRF was to boost French morale by visiting soldiers in hospitals and providing them with cigarettes, candy, and games.Footnote 50
The FLN leadership was consistently critical of the CRF, accusing it of siding with the French army and European settler population. In January 1957, it decided to develop a separate national society, the Algerian Red Crescent (CRA). Given that the CRF had been operational in Algeria for decades, the Geneva-based ICRC was unlikely to recognize the newly conceived CRA. But the Algerian leadership was not deterred by the probability of the international organization only granting their national society de facto status, if any status at all. In his history of the Algerian Red Crescent, its former secretary general, Mustapha Makaci, explained that “revolutionary Algeria was not in the position to fulfill ICRC conditions . . . The Algerian government did not exist in this period . . . Yet meeting the population's needs was urgent. We had to consider an intermediary solution, a convenient solution.”Footnote 51 Members of the Comité de Coordination et d'Exécution (CCE), the precursor to the Algerian Provisional Government (GPRA), believed it was necessary for “wounded Algeria to create and have at its disposal a mouthpiece close to the international committees of Red Crosses and Red Crescents, to solicit and receive aid.”Footnote 52 They envisioned that the CRA would work closely with the ICRC; the former's first president, Omar Boukli-Hacène (ʿUmar Buqli Hasan), a lawyer from Tlemcen, expressed hope that “de jure recognition [of the CRA] would be linked to Algerian independence.”Footnote 53 The CRA would be the kind of organization that other countries around the world would respect. Its delegates would monitor and report French violations of human rights and of the Geneva Conventions in Algeria. The nationalists’ early articulation of CRA responsibilities shows a shrewd political awareness of the boundaries the new organization could contest, and the issues it could exploit, in the future.
Algerians met as early as September 1956 to discuss the possibility of forming a Red Crescent.Footnote 54 In December 1956, the CCE—the FLN chief executive body—approved the creation of the CRA, with the understanding that it would follow FLN directives and would be “perfectly integrated” into the existing executive FLN–ALN war branches. It would function as a much needed social wing of the revolutionary movement, supplementing its primary political and military initiatives.Footnote 55 The CRA would pursue a complementary agenda to that of the FLN and ALN, yet it would have different responsibilities from those branches because it would use humanitarian ideals, principles, and rhetoric to expand support by merging Algerian “political questions with humanitarian ones”—a dangerous combination, from the perspective of ICRC representative Pierre Gaillard.Footnote 56
Appropriating humanitarian language was a key component of CRA strategy; it projected an awareness of and commitment to international norms, demonstrating that Algerian leaders were capable of translating a vocabulary developed by Western institutions into one that served their own ends and through which they could make claims for sovereignty.Footnote 57 CRA representatives drew freely from ICRC literature in formulating the central elements of its mission, which included treating the injured, assisting war victims, serving as an intermediary between prisoners of war and their families, and facilitating ICRC missions to Algeria.Footnote 58 Additional CRA concerns were to assist the growing Algerian refugee population in Morocco and Tunisia; supply medicine and medical personnel to the ALN–FLN health-services division; and integrate Algeria into a global international aid movement.Footnote 59 The Algerians’ international ambition to align themselves with the Geneva-based organization and its humanitarian principles was clearly defined from the foundation of the CRA.Footnote 60
The CRA established its first offices in Tangiers and Tunis in early 1957; later that year it created branches in Geneva and Cairo. According to the first secretary general, Geneva was chosen because it was where the Red Cross and Red Crescent committees and international organizations were concentrated and Cairo because it could serve as a center “to receive donations and ensure their distribution.”Footnote 61 A general overview of CRA activities, likely written by one of its early officials, highlighted Cairo's strategic importance for connecting with “Middle Eastern brothers.”Footnote 62 In the same report, the author recounted the day-to-day tasks that the Tangier office performed—“foreign correspondence, continuous contact and discussion with ICRC representatives [contacts et discussion sans fins avec les Représentants du CICR], to make them recognize the CRA,” and “sending propaganda documents”—and encouraged those working in other cities to emulate them.Footnote 63 FLN delegates and early CRA leaders considered contacting sympathetic organizations for aid and lobbying the ICRC crucial components of their work. The CRA set out to establish relationships with influential representatives of humanitarian organizations and communicate regularly with national Red Cross societies around the world, hoping to show the extent of its dedication to conducting the war in a humane fashion.
Just four weeks after radios announced the creation of the CRA on 8 January 1957, at the height of the battle of Algiers and shortly before the FLN eight-day strike initiative, the new organization's representatives were sending letters to national societies abroad and enlisting their support.Footnote 64 For example, a letter from Boukli-Hacène to the president of the English Red Cross in London on 7 February informs the latter that “the CRA had been established in Tangiers” and that it “pursued the exact same goals” as other national societies around the world. Boukli-Hacène stresses “the long-lasting feelings of solidarity that motivate your organization and your great nation,” to act on behalf “of the suffering” and asks that the English Red Cross “respond with aid for Algerian soldiers, the sick and wounded, and orphans and refugees.”Footnote 65
By March 1957, CRA leaders were writing to and meeting with ICRC representatives. On 8 and 9 March, the CRA president, general secretary, and treasurer arrived in Geneva from Tangiers and met with FLN delegates and ICRC delegate Claude Pilloud. CRA President Boukli-Hacène had prepared a lengthy memo explaining why the ICRC should recognize the CRA; however, none of the reasons given were tenable according to ICRC conditions for an official national society. The two parties discussed prisoners, ICRC visits to Algeria, and the possibility of sending trained medical personnel to aid the Algerians. The Algerian delegates also used the meeting to raise “a long list of French atrocities and inhumane treatment,” including “executions, torture, hostages, attacks, pillages, and rapes” committed by French authorities.Footnote 66 Even though Pilloud does not make any definitive recommendations about how the international organization might proceed with the Algerians, securing a face to face meeting with the ICRC was an achievement for the new organization because it unofficially legitimized CRA action.
The motivations for the creation of the CRA were not lost on Pilloud, who voiced concerns about the aims of the organization and “the delicate position” in which it had placed the ICRC. Pilloud remarked that
the goal of creating this organism is to have an institution, distinct from the FLN, that will be able to negotiate with the ICRC and humanize the war. There is a tendency from my FLN interlocutors to send all problems that might interest the ICRC to the Algerian Red Crescent . . . Upon their return to Tangiers, they were going to assemble the CRA committee and [re]examine the problem in light of [what I said].
He worried that by meeting with CRA representatives he had recognized their activities and, by extension, their organization. He promised “to do my best to avoid difficulties for the ICRC,” though “this [would] not be easy.”Footnote 67 Pilloud's concerns were not unfounded. Association with the reputable humanitarian institution provided the Algerian nationalists an opportunity to present their agenda as analogous to that of the ICRC and to create a broader international platform from which to make appeals.
1958: SOLIDIFYING A HUMANITARIAN AGENDA
The year 1958 was a turning point in the war. Charles de Gaulle returned to power in France and began a gradual four-year shift in official policy toward Algerian independence; many of the original FLN leaders, including Hocine Aït Ahmed, Rabah Bitat, Mohamed Khider, and Mohamed Boudiaf,Footnote 68 established the Algerian Provisional Government (GPRA) in Cairo; and revelations about the systematic use of torture started to change French public opinion about the conflict.Footnote 69 As Matthew Connelly has shown, the Algerians “employed human rights reports, press conferences, and youth congresses” as weapons to rally “majorities against France at the United Nations, [win] accolades of international conferences, and [gain] twenty-one-gun salutes in capitals across the globe.”Footnote 70 Internationalizing the conflict through diplomacy was always a central component of nationalist strategy, and, as Connelly's work shows, after 1958 the GPRA was increasingly successful in achieving this aim.
Yet a vital dimension of the Algerian nationalists’ global outreach has been overlooked. Beginning in the fall of 1958, GPRA leaders, and its president Ferhat Abbas in particular, worked closely with the CRA to create an image of themselves and the Algerian people as humanitarians. Two ways they did this were by organizing French-prisoner releases attended by representatives of the European and Maghribi press and by expanding their propaganda and solicitation campaigns for aid. These efforts yielded millions of dollars in donations from countries as far away as Japan, Korea, the Soviet Union, and Cuba and helped the CRA obtain crucial medical supplies that the French government had purposely withheld. Nationalists used the Red Crescent as a launch pad to construct a version of the Algerian struggle and colonial oppression that it wanted the world to hear.
French colonial discourse had long portrayed Algerians as “intensely violent by nature,” a myth that predates 1830 but that the French military manipulated throughout the conquest in the 19th century. Similar claims were made during major uprisings against the colonial regime in the wake of World War II, most notably after the Sétif and Guelma protests in May 1945.Footnote 71 The war for independence provided the French government with a new occasion to demonize its enemy. The FLN was described as a violent group that “neglected all the laws and customs of war” and could not overcome its internal divisions and personal struggles for power.Footnote 72 Others, such as a pied-noir farmer at Ménerville, approximately forty miles east of Algiers, portrayed Algerians as ruthless people who “don't kill because they have anything against you. These days they kill for the sake of killing.”Footnote 73
French government and military officials regularly depicted the FLN and ALN as organizations of brutal savages. However, confirmation of French torture in 1958—a dominant military strategy until 1960—galvanized French domestic opinion against the government's actions.Footnote 74 Algerian nationalists exploited the torture revelations to recast the colonial administration as an abuser and violator of its own republican ideals. Moreover, with the help of the CRA, the FLN shifted the focus of the debate, casting its members as liberal, generous humanitarians willing to voluntarily follow the Geneva Conventions.
The CRA and ICRC corresponded continually during the first eighteen months of the former's existence, often on the issue of prisoners. Central elements of the ICRC's mission were providing relief for prisoners of war on both sides, tracing missing persons, and reporting on the wounded.Footnote 75 The ICRC had initially hoped that the CRA, even though not officially recognized, would provide the international organization with information about French POWs. (It asked the same of the French military regarding Algerian POWs.) Despite repeated efforts by Ferhat Abbas and Djilali Bentami (Jilali bin Tami, a CRA delegate and doctor in Geneva) throughout 1957 and the first half of 1958, they could not obtain reliable information from the FLN and ALN regarding the whereabouts and health of French prisoners. After a summer 1958 meeting in Geneva, ICRC delegate I. Zreikat's report hinted at frustration when working with the Algerians. He wrote that “Dr. Bentami understands the necessity of an FLN gesture and that it observe the Red Cross humanitarian principles if it wants reciprocity.”Footnote 76 Up until this point, he added, it had not done so.
This changed later in the year with the creation of the GPRA. Abbas had been in contact with the ICRC for nearly two years by the time he was named head of the GPRA and was thus familiar with Red Cross concerns about French prisoners. In one of his first official acts, on 3 October 1958, Abbas, along with GPRA Vice President and Minister of the Armed Forces Krim Belkacem and Minister of the Interior Lakhdar Ben Tobbal, issued a prisoner release decree that extended “a general amnesty to certain categories of detainees.”Footnote 77 It specified that “all detainees who were in local FLN and ALN units with the exception of those pursued or condemned for high treason or collaboration with the enemy” were entitled to amnesty and liberation. The official notice concluded that “certain French soldiers” held by the ALN also would “be liberated without conditions and returned to their families by delegates of the International Red Cross of Geneva.”Footnote 78 This decree would soon have an undeniable impact on improving relations with the ICRC and on reshaping the image of Algerian nationalists. The GPRA and CRA had interacted with the ICRC long enough to know that prisoner safety was one of the international organization's priorities, and Abbas hoped to prove that he and CRA representatives were worthy interlocutors on whom the ICRC could depend. The GPRA and CRA also had a chance to combat the negative press, propaganda, and derogatory portrayals the French government was circulating globally.
The nascent Algerian government wanted to project a positive image of Algerian men and women fighting for national liberation, one that suggested they believed in human rights, treated French prisoners with respect, and embraced the Geneva Conventions. Eleven days after the 3 October decree, an unnamed GPRA member discussed the potential impact prisoner releases could have on the organization and recommended that they should be brought to the attention of local press, political personalities, and organizations such as the Red Cross. He stressed that it was “very desirable that the accent be put on our liberalism and our concern for humanity.”Footnote 79 In the event that prisoner releases “need[ed] to be explained in political terms to your interlocutors,” he recommended that it should first be made clear that “it is an act of good will on our part [and] implies to our adversary that we respect the Geneva Conventions.” Second, “it is from a position of strength that we are able to be liberal and generous. [Our actions] are not a sign of weakness.” And third, “we await a French Government response to our eminently humane initiative” that shows “the same good will.” When possible, he concluded, “it is in this way that newspaper editorials should be oriented.”Footnote 80 The nationalists’ willingness to tackle the delicate matter of POWs was a deliberate strategy to demonstrate to the ICRC that they intended to comply with humane practices.
The Algerian leadership did not waste any time preparing their first prisoner-release ceremony in Tunisia. Two and a half weeks after Abbas announced the decree, the ALN released four French prisoners it had captured near Sakhiet-Sidi-Youssef on 11 January of that year and had held for ten months.Footnote 81 Working in conjunction with the Tunisian Red Crescent (CRT), the CRA organized a ceremony for their release on 20 October 1958. El Moudjahid reported that Aziz Djellouli (al-ʿAziz al-Jaluli), president of the CRT, and ICRC delegates Jean de Preux and Pierre Gaillard presided over the occasion, which lasted just under one hour. Roughly sixty members of the international press and radio were on hand to witness the French soldiers returning to their families.Footnote 82 According to the GPRA press statement, an unidentified representative of the political organization told the crowd that this occasion was a result of the 3 October decree and was not contingent upon the release of Algerian POWs by the French.Footnote 83 This effort demonstrated the commitment of the GPRA, the CRA, and the CRT to work together and to distance themselves from the colonial administration's accusations that the FLN was a terrorist group. The GPRA, in its infant stages, facilitated this event and successfully coordinated various Algerian organizations, signaling a renewed interest in incorporating CRA work into the broader nationalist political strategy.
Additional prisoner releases throughout North Africa followed the initial one in Tunisia. On 3 November 1958, Colonel Amirouche (ʿAmirush), the influential leader of Wilaya III, supervised the ALN release of six French soldiers in Kabylia.Footnote 84 Muhammad Yazid, GPRA minister of information, wrote a memo from Cairo one week later saying “these six French prisoners publicly recognized, in declarations that were reproduced by the French press on 5 and 6 November, that they were well treated by the ALN.” Yazid remarked that “global opinion will not fail to realize that this new release of French prisoners is taking place at a moment when the French Government is violating international laws of war more than ever.”Footnote 85
In Morocco, as in Tunisia and Algeria, an ICRC delegation assisted ALN officials and the CRA in a prisoner-release ceremony, held during the second week of December 1958. According to “Nadir,” a GPRA external-affairs representative, the nationalists counted on “the maximum amount of publicity,” and, if possible, the coverage should underscore that the Algerians’ actions reflected their government's respect for the laws of war, which the French army violated daily. This latest release was indicative of new humanitarian gestures that would define future GPRA, FLN–ALN, and CRA politics.Footnote 86 In two short months, the GPRA and CRA worked with the CRT, Moroccan officials, and ICRC intermediaries in three Maghribi countries. These ceremonies provided a stark contrast to the images and stories about Algerian barbarism published in the French press. They were meant also to serve as “positive gestures” that “clearly expressed” the desire to “unilaterally humanize the conflict.”Footnote 87 The Algerian leaders wanted to present themselves as operating according to international humanitarian principles.
Building upon the success of the prisoner-release ceremonies, the GPRA, the CRA, and the FLN–ALN focused on publicizing the plight of Algerian refugees to broaden their strategy for soliciting financial and material aid and garnering international sympathy for their anticolonial struggle. The French government had begun creating regroupement centers in Algeria as early as 1955 in an effort to pacify the countryside. The number of regroupement centers increased dramatically after 1957, when they were systematically implemented as part of French military strategy. Three years into the war, there were almost 240,000 Algerian civilians living in 382 temporary and permanent centers. By early 1960, there were approximately 1.5 million Algerians living in over 1,700 centers, and later that year nearly one-fourth of the Algerian people had been forcibly resettled into them.Footnote 88 During the course of the French army's efforts to relocate the indigenous population within Algeria, several hundred thousand became refugees in Morocco and Tunisia. By 1959, over 200,000 Algerians had fled their homeland and were in need of food, clothing, and medicine.
The CRA began producing pamphlets and memos detailing the plight of these refugees. One publication, titled “Les réfugiés algériens,” included graphic images of refugees and the deplorable conditions in which they lived due to the destructive nature of French military action.Footnote 89 The pamphlet called on readers to recognize common human characteristics and to get involved in the CRA relief effort. The Algerian national society took full advantage of the ICRC network and circulated its materials to as many national Red Cross and Red Crescent societies as it could contact. CRA publications were a direct rebuttal of French accusations of Algerian brutality and provided compelling evidence that France had violated international law. This new phase of Algerian propaganda aimed to publicize the war; familiarize the world with Algerian refugees; demonstrate severe financial, medical, and material need; and ask for aid. The CRA refined this method of solicitation and received millions of dollars during the second half of the war.
The CRA sent a “call on behalf of refugees” to Arab allies in Damascus, Beirut, Baghdad, Khartoum, Amman, Benghazi, and Jeddah, imploring them to apply pressure on their governments and on social organizations in their countries. The plea described refugee conditions in Morocco and Tunisia and asserted that “more than 300,000 Algerians, 50 percent of whom are children, 35 percent women, and 15 percent elderly individuals,” lived across the borders. The Moroccan and Tunisian governments had made significant relief contributions, but they could not provide aid sufficient to meet the need.Footnote 90 Therefore, the CRA was calling on concerned Arab neighbors to respond and send donations.
The fundraising campaign succeeded in raising funds from across the Arab world; donations came in all materials and amounts and were sent to CRA offices in Tunis and to the Moroccan and Tunisian Red Crescent societies. The Libyan Red Crescent's Central Committee sent $25,000 for child refugees in combat zones.Footnote 91 Jordan sent approximately 80,000 Swiss francs to the CRA office in Tangiers.Footnote 92 Syria sent 60,000 French francs worth of flour and cornmeal.Footnote 93 Donations to the CRA for refugee aid continued to arrive through 1962: Tunisia sent over 200 kilograms of medication and several shipments of clothesFootnote 94; Jordan sent more than 5,000 pieces of clothingFootnote 95; and Lebanon sent thirty-two million francs worth of medication,Footnote 96 to name just a few of the Arab nations that participated in the war relief effort.
But even more telling of the CRA's aid solicitation success was the extent to which countries and organizations outside the Arab world responded to its calls for help. Countries such as Italy and Portugal began sending clothes, blankets, milk, and cloth as early as 1958, as did Japan, Canada, Chile, and Norway.Footnote 97 The Turkish Red Crescent donated thirty tons of sugar and medicine.Footnote 98 North Vietnam sent medicine and rice to the Casablanca office.Footnote 99 The East German Red Cross contributed 250,000 marks worth of medication for refugees in February 1958.Footnote 100 French military intelligence even noted that the CRA received donations from nations such as China and Sweden, including medication, money, and bed covers.Footnote 101 International organizations also increased their aid after 1959.Footnote 102 In November and December 1960 alone, the CRA received seventy-five kilograms of “personal effects” from Italy and 410 kilograms of medication and general supplies from Switzerland.Footnote 103 In 1961, aid continued to stream into CRA offices from diverse organizations; the Indian Congress Committee sent 550 cotton blankets, 427 pounds of tea, and 1,000 vials of penicillin to Tunis, and the Vatican pledged $100,000 for refugee relief work.Footnote 104 The ICRC made large donations to the CRA throughout the war, especially after 1958. The global response is a powerful indicator of the CRA's success in constructing a compelling humanitarian message that went beyond Arab alliances and anticolonial movements.
CONCLUSION
The Algerian nationalist leadership created a formidable set of complementary health organizations that permitted them to engage in domestic and international outreach, proving the existence of a vibrant world beyond the French colonial state that was able to transcend national boundaries and interests. During the first half of the war, the FLN–ALN Services de Santé offered a counterpoint to colonial medical services and enabled nationalists to promote a state welfare agenda. In 1957, nationalists founded the Algerian Red Crescent, which not only provided an institutional link between Algerian political leaders, military officials, and medical personnel but also helped to develop and refine wartime strategies. By associating itself with the ICRC, emphasizing French torture, staging prisoner-release ceremonies, and publicizing the plight of Algerian refugees to garner aid, the CRA appropriated universal discourses of health and humanitarianism to reshape international perceptions of Algerians and their war for national liberation. This article has aimed to situate their efforts within a broader history of decolonization and international humanitarianism and to contribute to rethinking the process through which political claims were made at the end of empire.
