Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:37:53.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural fractures in tight gas sandstones: a case study of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang gas field, Western Sichuan Basin, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2021

Yunzhao Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
Lianbo Zeng*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
Wenya Lyu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
Dongsheng Sun
Affiliation:
Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Sinopec, Beijing, 100083, China
Shuangquan Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
Cong Guan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China
Lei Tang
Affiliation:
College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, 102249, China Geophysical Exploration Institute, Jiangsu Oilfield, Sinopec, Nanjing, 210046, China
Jinxiong Shi
Affiliation:
School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, 434100, China
Junhui Zhang
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Exploration and Development of Sinopec Southwest Oil and Gas Company, Deyang, 618000, China
*
Authors for correspondence: Lianbo Zeng, Email: lbzeng@sina.com; Wenya Lyu, Email: wylvwenwen@163.com
Authors for correspondence: Lianbo Zeng, Email: lbzeng@sina.com; Wenya Lyu, Email: wylvwenwen@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation is a typical tight gas reservoir in which natural fractures determine the migration, accumulation and production capacity of tight gas. In this study, we focused on the influences of natural fractures on the tight gas migration and production. We clarified characteristics and attributes (i.e. dips, apertures, filling degree and cross-cutting relationships) of the fractures based on image logging interpretations and core descriptions. Previous studies of electron spin resonance, carbon and oxygen isotopes, homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions analysis and basin simulation were considered. This study also analysed the fracture sequences, source of fracture fillings, diagenetic sequences and tight gas enrichment stages. We obtained insight into the relationship between fracture evolution and hydrocarbon charging, particularly the effect of the apertures and intensity of natural fractures on tight gas production. We reveal that the bedding fractures are short horizontal migration channels of tight gas. The tectonic fractures with middle, high and nearly vertical angles are beneficial to tight gas vertical migration. The apertures of fractures are controlled by the direction of maximum principal stress and fracture angle. The initial gas production of the vertical wells presents a positive correlation with the fracture abundance, and the intensity and aperture of fractures are the fundamental factors that determine the tight gas production. With these findings, this study is expected to guide the future exploration and development of tight gas with similar geological backgrounds.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The location of the study area and main wells: (a) location of Sichuan Basin in China and Western Sichuan Depression in the Sichuan Basin; and (b) structural framework and the location of main wells in Xinchang gas field. The rose diagrams show the orientations of natural fractures from the image loggings in the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The stratigraphic characteristics of Western Sichuan Depression and Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation (modified from Li et al. 2014; Luo et al. 2019).

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of the research materials

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Natural fractures of the cores. (a) High-angle tectonic fracture from well Q6, at a depth of 4733.95 m; (b) The joint surface of high-angle tectonic fractures in (a); (c) low-angle tectonic fracture from well Q3, at a depth of 4918.55 m; (d) bedding fractures from well Q5, at a depth of 5026.95 m; (e) stylolite from well Q5, at a depth of 4931.46 m.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. The relationship between sandstone types and tectonic fracture density; the diameters of gritstone, medium sandstone, fine sandstone and siltstone are 0.5–2.0, 0.25–0.50, 0.10–0.25 and 0.01–0.10 mm, respectively.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Fractures detected by image loggings in wells Q5 and Q4. All fractures in the image loggings are open.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Rose diagram of the fracture strikes in the T3x2 tight gas sandstones in the Western Sichuan Basin. The data were obtained from image loggings (n = 1133).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Fracture cross-cutting and abutting relationships from cores. (a–c) Three types of calcite fillings cut and restricted each other based on the degree of crystallization and filling from well Q4, at a depth of 5252.29 m. (d) Carbonaceous clay fills some bedding fractures, but not all. Some tectonic fractures are filled with asphaltene and carbonaceous clay from well Q5 at a depth of 4967.56 m. (e) Tectonic fractures are filled with calcite, quartz and asphaltene in well Q4, at a depth of 5252.87 m.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Frequency histogram of homogenization temperature from inclusions in fracture calcite fillings in T3x2: (a) in the tectonic fracture (n = 11); (b) in the bedding fracture (n = 6); and (c) in the netted fracture (n = 9). The test data were obtained from Yang et al. (2012) and Deng et al. (2013).

Figure 9

Table 2. Results of quartz electron spin responance dating in the T3x2 sandstone of Xinchang area, Western Sichuan Basin

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Burial history, thermal history and the temperature of calcite fillings in the fractures in the Triassic Xujiahe Formation (Leng et al. 2011). Tr – Triassic; J – Jurassic; K – Cretaceous; Pg – Palaeogene; Ng – Neogene. T1 – first stage of tectonic fracture; T2 – second stage of tectonic fracture; T3 – third stage of tectonic fracture; B1 – first stage of bedding fracture; B2 – second stage of bedding fracture.

Figure 11

Table 3. Types and isotopic features of calcite cements and fillings in the T3x2 sandstone of Xinchang area, Western Sichuan Basin

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Carbon and oxygen isotope results. The data describing the calcite fillings in tectonic fractures are from Ma et al. (2013); calcite data in the matrix are from Luo et al. (2019).

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Petroleum system event and fracture formation time of the Triassic Xujiahe Formation. Data describing pore evolution and diagenesis of the reservoir are from Liu et al. (2018b) and Yu et al. (2019); data describing efficiency of hydrocarbon expulsion and petroleum system event are from Guo et al. (2012). T – Triassic; J – Jurassic; K – Cretaceous; Pg – Palaeogene; Ng – Neogene; Q – Quaternary.

Figure 14

Fig. 12. Evidence that bedding fractures maintain the seepage ability and enable the hydrocarbon to migrate. Bedding fracture in (a) well Q11, depth 4718.19 m and (b) well Q5, depth 6062.40 m. Cross-polarized light images.

Figure 15

Fig. 13. (a) The relationship between fracture strike and fracture aperture. (b) The distribution of filling degree in different fracture dips. (c) The relationship between fracture dip and fracture aperture. (d) Evaluation of relative importance of compactional processes and cementation to porosity development of sandstone, according to Ehrenberg (1989) and Li et al. (2011).

Figure 16

Fig. 14. The relationship between depth and fracture aperture in (a) the nearly horizontal fractures and low-angle fractures (0–30°); (b) middle-angle fractures (30–60°); and (c) the nearly vertical and high-angle fractures (60–90°). (d) The distribution of fracture aperture of fracture strike in the nearly vertical and high-angle fractures (60–90°).

Figure 17

Fig. 15. The relationship between fracture density and initial gas production.

Figure 18

Table 4. The relationship between tight gas daily productivity and fracture attributes