Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:04:11.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modified Koch curve broadband fractal antenna for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Monika Aggarwal*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering & Technology, Longowal, Sangrur (Punjab), India
Amar Partap Singh Pharwaha
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering & Technology, Longowal, Sangrur (Punjab), India
*
Author for correspondence: Monika Aggarwal, E-mail: monikaaggarwal76@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the design and development of broadband modified Koch curve microstrip patch antenna with multiband characteristics for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio applications. The proposed spectrum sensing antenna is designed specifically for its efficient operation in the spectrum (1.683–3.05, 4.246–9.714, and 11.25–18 GHz) specified for L, S, C, X, Ku with broadband characteristics and omnidirectional radiation pattern. The validity of the proposed shape is proved by having a comparison with other fractal shapes available in the literature.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometrical description of the proposed design: (a) generator, (b) first iteration, (c) second iteration.

Figure 1

Table 1. IFS generator equations for proposed geometry.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Iterations of the proposed design: (a) first iteration, (b) second iteration, (c) back view of the second iteration, (d) miniaturized second iteration.

Figure 3

Table 2. Dimensional parameters of the antenna

Figure 4

Fig. 3. S11 of modified Koch curve with various iterations.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Optimized geometry of the proposed design.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. S11 after optimization.

Figure 7

Table 3. Dimension obtained after optimization

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Fabricated antenna: (a) front view, (b) back view.

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Simulated and measured S11 of the proposed design.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Simulated and measured gain of the proposed design.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Fabricated antenna in anechoic chamber.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Normalized polar plots for E-plane at (a) 2.2 GHz, (b) 7.75 GHz, (c) 12.28 GHz, (d) 15.78 GHz.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Normalized polar plots for H-plane at (a) 2.2 GHz, (b) 7.75 GHz, (c) 12.28 GHz, (d) 15.78 GHz.

Figure 14

Table 4. Comparison of the proposed antenna with other fractal antennas in literature