Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T01:22:44.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of the cestode Triaenophorus nodulosus on the exotic Lepomis gibbosus and the autochthonous Perca fluviatilis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

G. MASSON
Affiliation:
Université de Lorraine, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Environnements Continentaux (LIEC), CNRS UMR 7360, Campus Bridoux, Rue du Général Delestraint, F-57070 Metz, France
M. VANACKER
Affiliation:
Department of Agroecology and Environment, ISARA Lyon (member of university of Lyon), 23 rue Jean Baldassini, 69364 Lyon, France
M. G. FOX
Affiliation:
Environmental and Resource Studies Program and Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9J 7B8, Canada
J.-N. BEISEL*
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale du Génie de l'Eau et de l'Environnement de Strasbourg (ENGEES), 1 Quai Koch, BP 61039, 67070 Strasbourg, France Laboratoire Image, Ville, Environnement (LIVE), CNRS UMR 7362, Université de Strasbourg, 3 rue de l'Argonne, 67083 Strasbourg, France
*
* Corresponding author. Beisel J.-N., ENGEES, 1 quai Koch, 67000 Strasbourg, France. E-mail: jn.beisel@engees.unistra.fr

Summary

The effects of plerocercoids of the cestode Triaenophorus nodulosus infecting the livers of native Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis and non-native pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus was investigated in 17 sites along the Moselle watershed. With a single exception, infected individuals were not observed in the main channel whether or not northern pike Esox lucius, a final host, was present. In ponds where the pike was present, the prevalence of T. nodulosus averaged 86% in Eurasian perch and 15% in pumpkinseed. The parasite was not present at all in ponds when pike were absent. Parasite load, hepatosomatic index (HSI), gonadosomatic index (GSI) and body condition index (CI) were compared between hosts in one site where parasite prevalence and fish abundance was highest. HSI in infected perch was significantly higher than in uninfected perch, whereas no differences in HSI were detected between infected and uninfected pumpkinseed. While perch were more frequently infected and had a greater average parasite load than pumpkinseed, there were no significant differences in either indicator between the two species. Furthermore, no significant differences in GSI or CI were observed between infected and uninfected fish in either species, by either gender or maturity stage. We hypothesize that pumpkinseed is more resistant to the parasite or less likely to feed upon infected copepods than perch.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the Moselle River basin, France, with the 17 study sites indicated by numbers (see Tables 1 and 2) and sampled between 2009 and 2011. 1: Saulxures/Moselotte Pond; 2: St-Nabord Pond; 3: Châtel/Moselle Pond; 4: Chamagne Pond; 5: Flavigny/Moselle Pond; 6 and 7: Pont-à-Mousson backwater and Pond; 8: Jouy Canal; 9: Metz Chanel; 10 and11: La Maxe Canal and Pond; 12: Argancy Pond; 13: Mondelange Pond; 14: Moselle River at Uckange; 15: Mirgenbach Reservoir; 16: Sentzich Pond; 17: Berg/Moselle backwater.

Figure 1

Table 1. Distribution of perch Perca fluviatilis in the 17 sampling sites along the Moselle River basin. Fish number (n), minimum and maximum total length (min–max TL), prevalence, mean PI and mean total weight of parasites (Wp). The location of study sites is given in Fig. 1, with sites numbered in order of their upstream–downstream position. ‘Connected’ sites are locations over water. ‘Semi-closed’ water bodies are only weakly connected with the Moselle River downstream (Pont-à-Mousson) or upstream (Jouy-aux-Arches). ‘Closed’ water bodies are gravel pit ponds disconnected from the river and filled with backwater. A ‘backwater’ is a section of the Moselle River that lies alongside the main channel and is not navigable, whereas a ‘channel’ is a navigable section alongside the river

Figure 2

Table 2. Distribution of pumpkinseed L. gibbosus in the 17 sampling sites along the Moselle River basin. Number of fish sampled (n), minimum and maximum total length (min–max TL), prevalence, mean PI and mean total weight of parasites (Wp). Definitions of water body type are given in Table 1.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Length distribution of infected (black bars) and uninfected (white bars) Eurasian perch (A) and pumpkinseed (B) sites where the parasite Triaenophorus nodulosus was found in one or both of the species. Data shown are pooled across sites.

Figure 4

Table 3. Model selection results from an analysis of the influence of biotic and abiotic variables on the prevalence of T. nodulosus (loge(x + 1)-transformed) in (A) pumpkinseed and (B) Eurasian perch. The biotic variables for pumpkinseed are the site means of TL, body mass (m), HSI, GSI and CI; the abiotic variables are surface area, mean depth, maximum depth, presence or absence of pike (PIKE), degree of connectivity and extent of vegetation cover. Variables are the same for Eurasian perch, less HSI, GSI and CI, as these data were not available. Candidate models are ranked by the Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc), with the differences between models shown as Δi. The models displayed are those classified as strong (Δi ≤ 2). Also shown for each model are the number of model parameters (K), relative likelihood, Akaike weight (wi), and proportion of variation explained by the model, adjusted for the number of variables (R2), and the probability of significance for the model (P)

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Mean Heptosomatic Index (HSI, %) values (with SD) according to gender, maturity stage and species for Eurasian perch (A) and pumpkinseed (B). Black bars correspond to infected fish, and white bars to uninfected fish. Numbers above histograms refer to the sample size. Different letters above the bars denote significantly different values (Tukey's HSD test, P < 0.05). Asterisks show significant differences between uninfected and infected fish of the same sex and maturity status (** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Mean Parasitism Index (PI, %) values (with SD) by gender, maturity stage and species for Eurasian perch (white bars) and pumpkinseed (hatched bars). Numbers above histograms refer to the sample size. Different letters above the bars denote significantly different values (Tukey's HSD, P > 0.05 in all cases).

Figure 7

Table 4. Mean GSI ±s.d. and CI between genders, maturity stage, for individual Eurasian perch and pumpkinseed infected and uninfected with T. nodulosus. P-values were obtained with a two-way ANOVA