Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T02:19:48.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A cascade model connecting life stress to risk behavior among rural African American emerging adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2010

Gene H. Brody*
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Yi-Fu Chen
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Steven M. Kogan
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Gene H. Brody, Center for Family Research, University of Georgia, 1095 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30602-4527; E-mail: gbrody@uga.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A three-wave cascade model linking life stress to increases in risk behavior was tested with 347 African American emerging adults living in the rural South. Data analyses using structural equation modeling and latent growth curve modeling demonstrated that life stress was linked to increases in risk behavior as African Americans transitioned out of secondary school. The cascade model indicated that life stress fostered increases in negative emotions. Negative emotions, in turn, were linked to increases in affiliations with deviant peers and romantic partners; this forecast increases in risk behavior. The findings supported a stress proliferation framework, in which primary stressors affect increases in secondary stressors that carry forward to influence changes in risk behaviors that can potentially compromise mental health.

Information

Type
Regular Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1. The theoretical structural equation modeling reciprocal influence cascade model.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The reciprocal influence structural model; χ2 = 64.52, df = 31, p = .000; comparative fit index = 0.97; root mean square error of approximation = 0.06 (0.04, 0.07).

Figure 2

Table 1. Intercorrelations, means, and standard deviations for all study variables

Figure 3

Figure 3. Cross-lagged analyses: (a) χ2 = 19.93, df = 6, p = .00; comparative fit index = 0.98; root mean square error of approximation = 0.08 (0.04, 0.12); (b) χ2 = 22.44, df = 15, p = .02; comparative fit index = 0.98; root mean square error of approximation = 0.05 (0.02, 0.08).

Figure 4

Figure 4. The structural equation modeling and latent growth modeling structural model; χ2 = 47.23, df = 29 p = .02; comparative fit index = 0.98; root mean square error of approximation = 0.04 (0.02, 0.06).