Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:24:52.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Volchia Griva mineral oasis as unique locus for research of the mammoth fauna and the late Pleistocene environment in Northern Eurasia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

Sergey V. Leshchinskiy*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Continental Ecosystems, Tomsk State University, Lenin Ave. 36, Tomsk 634050, Russia. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Koptyug Avenue 3, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Elena M. Burkanova
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Continental Ecosystems, Tomsk State University, Lenin Ave. 36, Tomsk 634050, Russia. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Koptyug Avenue 3, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
*
*Corresponding author e-mail addresses: sl@ggf.tsu.ru, mammothfauna@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the results of research at Volchia Griva, the largest site in Asia containing mammoth fauna in situ. It is situated in the south of the West Siberian Plain in the Baraba forest-steppe zone, and occupies an area of several hectares. Analysis of sediments and taphonomy of the site allows us to suggest that thousands of megafaunal remains were buried here in mud pits and erosional depressions. The favorable geochemical landscape of Volchia Griva attracted animals during periods of mineral starvation. This is reflected in the high mortality in two intervals, ca. 20–18 14C ka BP and ca. 17–11 14C ka BP. The results of palynological analysis of samples from the upper part of the Volchia Griva section made it possible to reconstruct the history of landscape changes of the Baraba Lowland during the MIS 2. Forb-mesophytic meadows were common at the beginning of this period, with taiga type forests. At ca. 20 14C ka BP, an abrupt and significant aridization of the climate occurred, which led to the degradation of forests. The mammoth steppe was widely developed, dominated by forb-grass association and with areas of alkali meadows and soils. Such conditions existed probably until the mid-Holocene.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2022
Figure 0

Figure 1. Position of the Volchia Griva: (a) administrative map of the West Siberian Plain (* indicates the site); (b) county map with local altitudes in meters; (c) the Volchia Griva site within Mamontovoe Village (satellite image), areas: C = central, NE = northeastern.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The arbitrary upper level of the VG bone-bearing horizon (2015 excavations). Weathering stages 4 and 5 of bone surfaces prevail. Solid arrows indicate long bones that were crushed during trampling; dashed arrow shows the mammoth pes portion.

Figure 2

Figure 3. The arbitrary lower level of the VG bone-bearing horizon (2015 excavations). Weathering stages 2 and 3 of bone surfaces prevail. Broken ribs under pressure (solid arrows) and a steep dip of some bones (dashed arrows) indicate severe trampling.

Figure 3

Table 1. The results of radiocarbon analysis for the samples from the northeastern assemblage of the Volchia Griva site (2015 excavation).

Figure 4

Figure 4. The middle level of the VG bone-bearing horizon (2016 excavations). Weathering stages of bone surfaces present are from 1–5. Solid arrows indicate long bones and the pelvis (a) with the highest degree of weathering; dashed arrows show portions of the vertebral column and mammoth manus (b) in anatomical position.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The lower level (upper part) of the VG bone-bearing horizon (2016 excavations). Remains of at least three mammoths are visible. Weathering stages 0 and 1 of bone surfaces prevail. Solid arrows indicate anatomical articulations of the vertebrae; dashed arrows show the fused ulna and radius, the large mandible lying above the rest of bones; (a) humerus with strong gnawing marks (dotted arrows); (b) the tusk distal end penetrates down to the bottom of horizon (contoured by dashed lines); dotted arrow indicates mammoth spinous process with a hole (pathology).

Figure 6

Figure 6. The bottom of the VG bone-bearing horizon (2017 excavations). The gully limit is clearly visible (contoured by dashed line). Solid arrows indicate numerous holes of burrowing animals.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Cross-section of the ancient small gully with bone-bearing horizon of the VG central faunal assemblage. 1 = sand; 2 = silt; 3 = clay; 4 = loess-like loam; 5 = soil; 6 = boundaries: a, certain; b, assumed; 7 = desiccation cracks; 8 = faunal remains; 9 = sampling points; 10 = boundaries of bone-bearing levels; 11 = bone-bearing levels: lbbl, lower bone-bearing level; mbbl, middle bone-bearing level; ubbl, upper bone-bearing level.

Figure 8

Figure 8. The middle level of the VG bone-bearing horizon (2018 excavations). Remains of at least two mammoths are visible. Weathering stages 3–5 of bone surfaces prevail. (a) Large portion of vertebral column in anatomical position, solid arrows indicate the pelvis fragment and the humerus with highest weathering; (b) manus portion in anatomical position (dashed arrow); (c) vertical rib position indicating severe trampling; (d) fox mandible fragment under mammoth lumbar vertebra.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Structure of the VG bone-bearing horizon at the central faunal assemblage (2018 excavations). (a) middle level, (b) upper part of the lower level, (c) bottom of the lower level. Dashed lines show change of the ancient gully/mud pit limits. Solid arrows indicate holes of burrowing animals.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Holes of burrowing animals (solid arrows) that were excavated and washed separately (2017 excavations). Note the steep dip (angle up to 30° or more) of sediments in the cross-section of the ancient gully.

Figure 11

Table 2. The results of radiocarbon and isotopic analyses for the samples from the central assemblage of the Volchia Griva site (2016–2018 excavations).

Figure 12

Figure 11. Mammoth vertebra with a hole in the spinous process (2016 excavations).

Figure 13

Figure 12. δ13C values of VG mammal bone collagen through time.

Figure 14

Figure 13. δ15N values of VG mammal bone collagen through time.

Figure 15

Figure 14. Pollen diagram for sediments of the VG central faunal assemblage (2016 excavations). 1 = sample numbers; 2 = very rare pollen grains and spores; 3 = content up to 3% (AP and NAP of the main percentage sum, WAP and spores of AP+NAP; abbreviations in the Table 3). Other symbols in Figure 7.

Figure 16

Table 3. Number and share of pollen grains and spores in samples 1–6 (AP and NAP as% of the main percentage sum, WAP and spores as % of AP+NAP). Abbreviations to Tables 3–5 and Figure 14: AP = arboreal pollen, NAP = non-arboreal pollen, WAP = wetland and aquatic plant pollen.

Figure 17

Table 4. Number and share of pollen grains and spores in samples 7–12 (AP and NAP as % of the main percentage sum, WAP and spores as % of AP+NAP).

Figure 18

Table 5. Number and share of pollen grains and spores in samples 13–15, A–D (AP and NAP as % of the main percentage sum, WAP and spores as % of AP+NAP).

Figure 19

Figure 15. The δ13C and δ15N values of woolly mammoth bone collagen from VG (circles), compared to ranges from Europe (red box), Siberia (blue box), and Eastern Beringia (green box) (Bocherens et al., 1996; Szpak et al., 2010; Drucker et al., 2015, 2018; Seuru et al., 2017; Kuitems et al., 2019; Kuzmin et al., 2021).

Figure 20

Figure 16. The δ13C and δ15N values of canine bone collagen from VG (squares), compared to ranges from Europe (red box), Siberia (blue box), and Eastern Beringia (green box) (Bocherens et al., 1996; Bocherens and Drucker, 2003; Bocherens, 2015; Drucker et al., 2017, 2018; Kuzmin et al., 2021).