Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T01:46:00.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Size- and shape-dependent photocatalysis of porphyrin nanocrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2019

Qi Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Special Functional Materials of the Ministry of Education, National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for High-Efficiency Display and Lighting Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Nano Functional Materials and Applications, Henan University, China; nanokingdom@163.com
Nana Zhao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Special Functional Materials of the Ministry of Education, National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for High-Efficiency Display and Lighting Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Nano Functional Materials and Applications, Henan University, China; zhnanaer@163.com
Feng Bai
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Special Functional Materials of the Ministry of Education, National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for High-Efficiency Display and Lighting Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Nano Functional Materials and Applications, Henan University, China; baifengsun@126.com

Abstract

The design and engineering of the size and shapes of photoactive building blocks enable the fabrication of functional nanocrystals, especially for applications in light harvesting, photocatalytic synthesis, water splitting, and photodegradation. Synthesis of such nanocrystals has been demonstrated recently through noncovalent interactions such as π–π stacking and ligand coordination using optically active porphyrin as a functional building block. Depending on the kinetic conditions, the resulting nanocrystals exhibit well-defined one- to three-dimensional shapes such as spheres, nanowires, and nano-octahedra. These well-defined porphyrin nanocrystals show interesting size- and shape-dependent photocatalytic activity. This article reviews the synthesis and formation of porphyrin nanocrystals with controlled size and shape. Important photocatalytic processes such as photodegradation of organic pollutants, photocatalytic water splitting and hydrogen production, and photosynthesis of metallic fuel-cell catalysts are highlighted. Insights on size- and shape-dependent properties are discussed.

Information

Type
Self-Assembled Porphyrin and Macrocycle Derivatives
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a [i, ii, iv]) Representative transmission electron microscope images and (iii) scanning electron microscope image of porphyrin nanocrystals with different morphologies, including (i) nanoparticles, (ii) hexagonal porous nanodisks, (iii) tetragonal nanorods, and (iv) hexagonal nanorods. (b) Photocatalytic activities of porphyrin nanocrystals. Tetragonal nanorods with 200-nm length (line 3), same concentration zinc meso-tetra(4-pyridyl)porphyrin (ZnTPyP) in dimethylformamide (line 4), same concentration ZnTPP in 0.01 M HCl (line 5), nanoparticles with 80-nm diameter (line 6), hexagonal nanowires with 2-μm length (line 7), hexagonal rods with 400-nm length (line 8), and hexagonal porous nanodisks (line 9) for photodegradation of methyl orange (MO) molecules under visible light irradiation. The results from blank experiments, where no Zn porphyrin nanocrystals were used (line 1) and commercial P25 (line 2) was used, are also presented for comparison. Hexagonal porous nanodisks (line 9) is the best visible light catalyst. (c) Nitrogen sorption isotherms obtained at 77 K for different porphyrin nanocrystals. The nitrogen isotherms are characteristic of Type IV isotherms for the nanodisks and hexagonal rods with hysteresis. The tetragonal rods show Type I isotherms without apparent hysteresis. (d) UV–vis absorption of porphyrin nanocrystals with different morphologies. Absorption spectra of self-assembled nanocrystals display more complicated signals in comparison to those of individual ZnTPPs, which may be due to the coupling of a conjugated π−π structure from individual ZnTPPs within the ordered assemblies.18 Note: C, concentration of light absorbing substance; C0, initial concentration of light absorbing material; t, time; UV, ultraviolet.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Arrangement pattern of supramolecular chains on the (101) facet, which is exposed on the cubic structures, of the 5,10,15,20-tetrakis-(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin (TPFPP). Selected-area electron diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (not provided here) verify that the square surfaces of the cubes are enclosed by {101} planes. Inset shows (left) a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of an individual cube. (Right) The different charge densities of the (101) facet were computed using the unit cell of the TPFPP single crystals, obtained from the experimental refined results, including nine TPFPP molecules. Red and blue colors represent obtained and lost electrons, respectively. (b) Arrangement of supramolecular chains on the (001) facet, exposed by the hexagonal faces of tetradecahedrons (TDHDs). The identical electronic couplings in the [010] (pink structures), [100] (blue structures), and [110] (green structures) directions of the {001} facets, resulting from their identical molecular packing, suggest a 2D multichannel charge carrier transport network. Inset shows (left) an SEM image of an individual TDHD. (Right) The different charge densities of the (001) facet were computed by using the unit cell of the TPFPP single crystals. Red and blue colors represent obtained and lost electrons, respectively. (c) Shape-sensitive electron–hole separation. For cubic structures, a comparatively smaller photocurrent response with weaker current intensity is observed (red curve), while a much stronger photocurrent response of a substantially boosted current intensity is detected from the TDHDs (blue curve). These observations validate the occurrence of a more efficient photo-induced electron−hole spatial separation in TDHDs. (d) Photocatalytic performance of cubes (red curve) and TDHDs (blue curve) toward bleaching of MOs and (inset) the corresponding histogram of the photoreaction rate constants. Compared to the cubes, TDHDs are superior photocatalysts, although both architectures have identical internal crystalline structures. Reprinted with permission from Reference 20. © 2017, American Chemical Society. Note: C, concentration of light absorbing substance; C0, initial concentration of light absorbing material; t, time; UV, ultraviolet.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Photocatalytic hydrogen production and characterizations of porphyrin powders and different self-assembled porphyrin nanostructures. (a, b) Morphology and structure of self-assembled porphyrin nano-octahedra and porphyrin nanowires, respectively. (a) A representative scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the octahedra; inset shows corresponding transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of an octahedron. (b) A representative SEM image of nanowires. (c) Hydrogen evolution photocatalyzed by porphyrin powders and different self-assembled nanostructures. The hydrogen production performance of all self-assembled nanostructures is superior to that of porphyrin powders. (d) X-ray diffraction results of different porphyrin nanostructures. The interplanar distance of lattice fringes decreases from 1.42 to 1.37 nm when the lengths of the nanowires decrease from 10 to 0.50 μm. (e) UV–vis spectra of different self-assembled porphyrin nanostructures. The change in light absorption is pronounced within the wavelength range indicated by the rectangular box. The UV–vis absorption spectrum of nanorods with length of 0.50 μm covers a broad range from 400 to 750 nm and exhibited the strongest absorption intensity in the absorption region. (f) Schematic illustration of self-assembled J-aggregates and photoinduced charge process for hydrogen generation and TEM micrograph of nanowires. The nanowires were prepared using 0.5 mM THPP and 2.5 mM cetyltrimethylammonium bromide at a pH of 2.70 and stirred for 48 h. Note: chloride (green); nitrogen (blue); oxygen (red); carbon (gray). Reaction conditions: 4 mg of porphyrin nanowires loaded with 5 wt% of Pt co-catalyst; 0.2 M AA aqueous solution (50 mL); 1 N NaOH was used to adjust the solution pH to 4; 300 W Xe lamp with a 420-nm cutoff filter for 5 h.25,26 Note: UV, ultraviolet; vis, visible; THPP, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4-(hydroxyl)phenyl) porphyrin; AA, ascorbic acid; n, molar amount; d, interplanar distance; θ, incident angle.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Schematic of photocatalytic synthesis of porphyrin-metal composite and hollow metal nanostructures. (i) Synthesis of well-defined optically active porphyrin nanostructures by self-assembly. (ii) Introduction of metal precursor onto the porphyrin nanostructure surface. (iii) The photocatalytic reduction of the metal precursor by the porphyrin nanostructure is conducted under visible light in the presence of an electron donor (ED), ascorbic acid (AA). (iv) A shell of metal nanoparticle networks forms at the surface of the photoactive porphyrin nanostructures as metal precursors are continuously reduced. (v) The hollow Pt nanostructures are obtained by removing the porphyrin nanostructure templates. The blue spheres represent cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (b) SEM image of zinc meso-tetra(4-pyridyl)porphyrin (ZnTPyP) long wires that have hexagonal shape, as shown in the (inset) cross-sectional view. (c) TEM image of Pt nanotubes; the length of the Pt nanotubes ranges from 2.3 to 2.6 μm, consistent with that of the initial ZnTPyP wire templates. (Inset) High-resolution SEM image shows the hexagonal shape of a nanotube, which has uniform shell thickness of 15 ± 2 nm. (d) TEM images of Pt/tin porphyrin nanosphere composites. Single Pt nanoparticles are formed on the tin porphyrin nanosphere, ∼3.2 nm in size. (e) TEM image of Pt/tin porphyrin nanosheet composites. (f) TEM image of Pd/tin porphyrin octahedra composites; inset shows the (left) selected-area fast Fourier transform and (right) high-resolution TEM image; and (g) TEM micrograph of Ag/tin porphyrin octahedra composites.19,27 Note: h, Planck’s constant; ν, frequency.