Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:31:40.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Petrogenesis of high Ba–Sr plutons with high Sr/Y ratios in an intracontinental setting: evidence from Early Cretaceous Fushan monzonites, central North China Craton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2019

Xi-Yao Li
Affiliation:
Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques, MOE, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, College of Marine Geosciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China Laboratory for Marine Geology and Environment, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China
San-Zhong Li*
Affiliation:
Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques, MOE, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, College of Marine Geosciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China Laboratory for Marine Geology and Environment, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China
Feng Huang
Affiliation:
School of Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Yong-Ming Wang
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404, USA
Sheng-Yao Yu
Affiliation:
Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques, MOE, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, College of Marine Geosciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China Laboratory for Marine Geology and Environment, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China
Hua-Hua Cao
Affiliation:
Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques, MOE, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, College of Marine Geosciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China Laboratory for Marine Geology and Environment, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China
Wei-Ming Xie
Affiliation:
Hebei Institute of Geological Survey, Shijiazhuang 050081, China
*
*Author for correspondence: San-Zhong Li, Email: Sanzhong@ouc.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Geochronological, major and trace element, and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic data are reported for the monzonitic rocks of the Fushan pluton in the Taihang Mountains, central North China Craton, in order to investigate their sources, petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Zircon U–Pb dating results reveal that the Fushan pluton was emplaced during the Early Cretaceous (∼126–124 Ma). The monzonites and quartz monzonites are mainly characterized by calc-alkaline and magnesian features and display light rare earth element (LREE) enrichment and flat heavy REE (HREE) patterns with slightly positive Eu anomalies. They have similar whole-rock initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.70653–0.70819), εNd(t) values (−13.6 to −18.6) and zircon εHf(t) values (−21.8 to −17.3). The primary magma of the Fushan pluton was derived from the partial melting of a spinel-facies amphibole-bearing ancient enriched lithospheric mantle. The monzonitic rocks also have high Ba–Sr and low Y and Yb contents, with high Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios. These geochemical features of monzonitic rocks are not only inherited from the magma source but also significantly enhanced by crystal fractionation during magmatic evolution; e.g. hornblende fractionation increased the Ba–Sr concentrations and Sr/Y ratios. During the Early Cretaceous, the slab sinking and roll-back of the Palaeo-Pacific Plate could have created an ancient big mantle wedge beneath East Asia and induced a lithospheric extensional process in the central North China Craton within an intracontinental setting.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Tectonic units of the North China Craton (after Zhao & Cawood, 2012); (b) distribution of Mesozoic magmatic intrusions in the southern Taihang Mountains (after Sun et al.2015); (c) geological map of the Fushan pluton (modified after a 1:25 000 geological map of Changzhi City and its peripheral area, 2008).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Macroscopic image of monzonitic rocks. (b–d) Photomicrographs of representative samples (cross-polarized light): (b) monzonite (QS35-10); (c) monzonite (QS35-4); (d) quartz monzonite (QS35-11). (Amp = amphibole, Q = quartz, Af = alkali–feldspar, Pl = plagioclase.)

Figure 2

Fig. 3. CL images of representative zircons and zircon U–Pb concordia diagrams. (a, b) Monzonite sample (QS35-14); (c, d) quartz monzonite sample (QS35-6). Red solid circles indicate U–Pb dating spots, whereas yellow dashed circles indicate Hf isotope analysis spots. Ages and εHf( t) values are also shown for each spot.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a) (K2O + Na2O) vs SiO2 (TAS; after Le Maitre, 2002); (b) A/CNK vs A/NK (after Maniar & Piccoli, 1989); (c) FeOT/(FeOT+ MgO) vs SiO2; and (d) (Na2O + K2O–CaO) vs SiO2 (after Frost et al.2001). All samples were normalized to 100 % after excluding the loss on ignition (LOI). A/CNK = Al2O3/(CaO + Na2O + K2O) in mole ratio; A/NK = Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) in mole ratio. Data sources: Early Cretaceous intrusive rocks in the southern Taihang Mountains: Dongye pluton (gabbro) (Wang et al.2006), Fushan pluton (Dong et al.2003; Chen et al.2004; Peng et al.2004; Xu et al.2009b) and other plutons (Chen et al.2004; Sun et al.2014, 2015).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Variations in (a) SiO2 vs MgO, (b) Fe2O3T, (c) Al2O3, (d) CaO, (e) Na2O, (f) TiO2. All samples were normalized to 100 % after excluding LOI. Data sources as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (b) primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams for the monzonitic rocks in the Fushan pluton. Normalization values are from McDonough & Sun (1995).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Initial 87Sr/86Sr vs εNd( t) diagram. Data sources: Early Cretaceous intrusive rocks in the southern Taihang Mountains as shown in Figure 4; Late Mesozoic magmatic rocks in the NCC: high Sr/Y lava in the NCC (Ma et al.2015); mafic rocks in the Taihang Mountains (Wang et al.2006); asthenospheric mantle-derived mafic rocks (107–78 Ma) (Ma et al.2014); EM1-SCLM and EM2-SCLM (Li et al.2018c); LCNC (lower crust of North China) (Jiang et al.2013); NCC lower crust and NCC upper crust (Jahn et al.1999).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Zircon 206Pb/238U ages vs εHf( t) diagram. Data sources for other intrusive rocks in the southern Taihang Mountains: diorite, monzonite, and syenite (Chen et al.2008; Sun et al.2014, 2015).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. (a) SiO2 vs εNd( t), (b) SiO2 vs Rb/Nb and (c) Nb/La vs Nb/Zr diagrams. Data sources: Early Cretaceous intrusive rocks in the southern Taihang Mountains as shown in Figure 4. End-members used in the mixing model: mafic magma (sample 20HD-78 in Wang et al.2006); acid lava (sample LMT-3 in Gao et al.2012); lower crustal xenoliths from the central NCC: pyroxene-rich mafic granulite (JN0918 in Jiang et al.2011), intermediate granulite (JN0811 in Jiang et al.2011) and felsic granulite (ZB-20 in Liu et al. 2001, 2004).

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Element variations of (a) CaO/Al2O3 vs MgO; (b) Cr vs Ni; (c) Ba vs Sr; and (d) Rb/Sr vs Sr. Data sources as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Diagrams of (a) La/Nb vs Ba/Nb (after Jahn et al.1999); (b) [Ta/La]N vs [Hf/Sm]N (after La Fleche et al.1998). N stands for primitive mantle-normalized. (c) Rb/Sr vs Ba/Rb; (d) SiO2 vs Dy/Yb (after Davidson et al.2007). Data sources as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. (a, b) Sr/Y vs Y (after Drummond & Defant, 1990; Ma et al.2015); (c, d) La/Yb vs Yb (after Castillo, 2012) diagrams. (a) Partial melting curves calculated for the mafic lower crust of the NCC with different restites after Ma et al. (2015). (c) partial melting trends of (a) eclogite (50:50 pyroxene: garnet), (b) 25 % garnet amphibolite (25:75), (c) 10 % garnet amphibolite (10:90) and (d) amphibolite, all with a starting N-MORB bulk composition after Castillo (2012). (b, d) Modelled Rayleigh fractionation of hornblende: curves 1 and 2 after Richards & Kerrich (2007) and curve 3 after Gao et al. (2012).

Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Table S3

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 11 KB
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16 KB
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Table S4

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.5 KB