Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Adjei, Evans Korang
Eriksson, Rikard H.
and
Lindgren, Urban
2016.
Social proximity and firm performance: the importance of family member ties in workplaces.
Regional Studies, Regional Science,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
303.
Meriac, John P.
and
Gorman, C. Allen
2017.
Work Ethic and Work Outcomes in an Expanded Criterion Domain.
Journal of Business and Psychology,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 3,
p.
273.
Zabel, Keith L.
Biermeier-Hanson, Benjamin B. J.
Baltes, Boris B.
Early, Becky J.
and
Shepard, Agnieszka
2017.
Generational Differences in Work Ethic: Fact or Fiction?.
Journal of Business and Psychology,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 3,
p.
301.
Theurelle-Stein, Delphine
and
Barth, Isabelle
2017.
Les soft skills au cœur du portefeuille de compétences des managers de demain.
Management & Avenir,
Vol. N° 95,
Issue. 5,
p.
129.
2019.
Ayayi, Ayi Gavriel
and
Dali, Chantale Sidohon
2020.
Entrepreneurial microcredit support: the silver bullet for microenterprises success. The case of funds Mauricie in Quebec.
Qualitative Research in Financial Markets,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
579.
Wang, Qian
and
Liu, Jiajun
2020.
Teaching for the future: a transnational university practice.
On the Horizon,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
85.
Clauson, Muriel
2020.
The Cambridge Handbook of the Changing Nature of Work.
p.
555.
Kuhn, Antony
and
Moulin, Yves
2021.
Le théâtre, un support pédagogique innovant pour développer le capital culturel des étudiants.
Projectics / Proyéctica / Projectique,
Vol. n°29,
Issue. 2,
p.
109.
Hesarzadeh, Reza
2025.
US sanctions, workforce dynamics, and corporate entrepreneurship: evidence from Iran.
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
422.
Maric, Anamarija
and
Cajner, Hrvoje
2025.
Effects of Personality Type Tools and Problem-Solving Methods on Engineering Company Project Success.
Sustainability,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 24,
p.
11185.
Shekh-Abed, Aziz
2025.
Futureproofing Engineering Education for Global Responsibility.
Vol. 1280,
Issue. ,
p.
285.
Law, Nancy
Wang, Nan
Ma, Ming
Liu, Zhichun
Lei, Leon
Feng, Shuhui
Hu, Xiao
and
Tsao, Jack
2025.
The role of generative AI in collaborative problem‐solving of authentic challenges.
British Journal of Educational Technology,
Pereira, Leandro Ferreira
and
de Carvalho, José Crespo
2026.
Impacts of AI on Human Expression and Relationship Building.
p.
275.
Mirzaei, Mehrnoosh
Kerr, Jeremy
and
Blackler, Alethea
2026.
Child-centred disaster preparedness: a three-step framework informed by embodiment and experiential learning.
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,
Vol. 146,
Issue. ,
p.
106502.

In only a very few places, Neubert, Mainert, Kretzschmar, & Greiff (Reference Neubert, Mainert, Kretzschmar and Greiff2015) mention the role of communication and coordination among team members in collaborative problem solving. Although complex and collaborative problem solving is indeed an imperative for team and organizational success in the 21st century, it is easier said than done. Collaborative problem solving is critically dependent on the communication and interaction skills of the team members and of the team leader. The intent of this commentary is to shine a light on the critical role of interpersonal and communication skills in complex and collaborative problem solving.
Skills in interpersonal communication, influence, and persuasion (as well as other factors, such as intrapersonal skills and ethics) are often collectively referred to as the “soft skills” of leaders and team members, as opposed to the “hard skills” of technical competence, cognitive problem solving, and decision making. In shared decision making and collaborative problem solving, there is little doubt that success is dependent not just on the technical process of making the decision but also on the soft skills of the parties involved. A host of studies suggest that effective communication is critical for solving complex, collaborative problems, ranging from the well-known studies of groupthink (Janis, Reference Janis1972) to studies of the role of communication in moving groups toward effective decisions (Scheerhorn, Geist, & Teboul, Reference Scheerhorn, Geist, Teboul and Frey1994) to studies of communication breakdown leading to increased errors and poor decision making in aircraft cockpit crews (Sexton & Helmreich, Reference Sexton and Helmreich2000).
Although most scholars cringe at the use of the term “soft skills” to describe the various intrapersonal and interpersonal skills required by leaders and effective team members, this rather vague term is used primarily because there are no agreed-on frameworks for capturing this vast array of skills (see Riggio & Tan, Reference Riggio and Tan2014). There have been some recent attempts to create a taxonomy of managerial/leadership skills, most notably a project outlined by Pichler and Beenen (Reference Pichler, Beenen, Riggio and Tan2014), but this model does not seem to capture the vast array of skills that scholars believe fit under the heading of “soft skills.” To this end, a recent conference and edited book (Riggio & Tan, Reference Riggio and Tan2014) focused on reviewing the domain of skills that might fit under a comprehensive taxonomy. It is interesting to note that the success of collaborative problem solving is largely dependent on the soft skills involved in the process and the particular areas of skills that were the topic of the conference and book. What are these critical “soft skills”?
Influence Tactics and Persuasion Skills
Collaborative problem solving requires moving a group toward a decision, but effectively critiquing the shared thinking and alternative courses of action are crucial to both arriving at a decision and making a decision that is of high quality.
Conflict Management Skills
Quality group decision making will inevitably lead to interpersonal conflicts. A key role of formal and informal group leaders is to manage the collaborative decision-making process in order to ensure that the group arrives at a good decision in a timely fashion.
Emotional Regulation and Emotional Intelligence
Emotions play an important part in group processes, and recent work on emotional regulation and emotional intelligence highlights the importance of member emotional competencies in effective group functioning. Collaborative decision making is likely to become heated at times, and members possessing skills in regulating emotions, and appropriately channeling them, is certainly going to positively impact collaborative decision making.
Political Skills
Collaborative decision making is, at its core, a political process. Effective decision makers must understand the dynamics of politics and group processes in order to avoid stalemates, roadblocks, and self-interested motives that may halt the decision-making process, or lead to problematic outcomes.
Moral/Ethical Orientation
One of the hottest topics in the study of leadership is moral/ethical decision making. When collaborative decision making involves making the “right” decision (in terms of ethics), then it is critical that members have good moral sensibilities to make an ethical decision.
The value of laying out this list of leader “soft skills” is that it provides a framework to better understand the nontechnical aspects of leadership and to guide research efforts. Each category is, in and of itself, broad, and each could be considered as a separate topic and research area within the extremely wide domain of leadership. We may not have a framework that allows us to comprehensively manage this vast array of soft skills, but we are certain that they all may come into play in important ways in complex and collaborative problem solving.