Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T15:22:22.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fish and invertebrate by-catch in the crab pot fishery in the Isle of Man, Irish Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2017

Fikret Öndes*
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK Faculty of Fisheries, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Cigli 35620, Turkey
Michel J. Kaiser
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK
Lee G. Murray
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: F. Öndes School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK email: fikret.ondes@ikc.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Baited trap or pot fisheries are considered to have relatively few wider ecosystem effects on the marine environment, particularly when compared with towed mobile fishing gear. However, this assumption is rarely tested in the field. This study aimed to determine the composition of non-target species that occur in crustacean pots and to assess spatial and temporal differences in catches in the waters around the Isle of Man, Irish Sea. The data were collected using fishery independent surveys and a questionnaire study. Based on fishery independent surveys, a total of five taxonomic groups and 43 species occurred as by-catch. The dominant by-catch species was velvet crab Necora puber. The by-catch per unit effort (BPUE) for all of the non-target species was low particularly in comparison to towed bottom gear fisheries around the Isle of Man. BPUE of species composition varied considerably between different locations around the Isle of Man. The results of both the fishery independent and questionnaire data suggested that the by-catch rates varied with season with peak BPUE occurring in spring which then declined into autumn and winter. By-catch composition did not decrease significantly with an increasing target species catch. Overall, by-catch was low relative to target species catch which may be partially attributable to the use of escape panels in pot fisheries in the Isle of Man.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (A) Location of the Isle of Man in the northern Irish Sea (ICES subdivision VII A); (B) study area subdivided into 42 areas of ~75 km2 with reference grid. Grid showing alpha-numeric coordinates for ICES statistical rectangle 37E5. NF; no commercial fishing using pot gear; ND, no data; SA, sampling area. The no-fishing areas were defined from the questionnaire study undertaken by Whiteley (2009) and DEFA (2013). Number of sampling (string number) per grid; J10: 14, J11: 8, K9: 16, K10: 29, K11: 25, K12: 14, L9: 7, L12: 22, M11: 21, N9: 14, N10: 34, N11: 13, O9: 26.

Figure 1

Table 1. Results of DIVERSE (Univariate Diversity Indices) analysis related to spatial trends in BPUE (indiv. 100 pots−1).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (A) By-catch composition by major taxonomic group and number of species; (B) % abundance of by-catch species according to their taxonomic groups; (C) Mean BPUE (±SE) of the six most abundant species (fish and invertebrates); (D) Mean BPUE (±SE) of the six most abundant fish species.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Mean BPUE for all by-catch species in each of the sampling areas. NF, no commercial fishing using pot gear; ND, no data.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. (A) Dendrogram and (B) MDS ordination plot showing the similarity in by-catch composition for each of the different sampling areas for standardized pot catch data. The offshore stations are J10 and J11, whilst inshore stations are K9, K10, K11, K12, L9, L12, M11, N9, N10, N11 and O9. The data were derived from 2489 hauled pots.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Cumulative K-dominance curves for all by-catch (mean BPUE) species in offshore (J10 and J11) and inshore (other sampling areas) stations.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Spatial differences in mean BPUE of the six most abundant species (N. puber, S. canicula, Galathea spp., M. glacialis, E. esculentus and A. rubens). NF, no commercial fishing using pot gear; ND, no data.

Figure 7

Table 2. Spatial differences of the mean BPUE of the six most abundant species using the Kruskal–Wallis test (df = 14). Pairwise comparisons of the mean CPUE for the different sampling areas for the six most abundant by-catch species.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Mean (±SE) BPUE of species (indiv. 100 pots−1) in each of the sampling seasons (spring 2012, summer 2012, autumn 2012, winter 2012, spring 2013, summer 2013).

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Seasonal variations in mean (±SE) BPUE of the six most abundant species (N. puber, S.canicula, Galathea spp., M.glacialis, E.esculentus and A. rubens). Black lines indicate a significant difference among seasons (pairwise comparisons, non-parametric tests), significance level: *0.05.

Figure 10

Table 3. Seasonal differences of the mean BPUE of the six most abundant species using the Kruskal–Wallis test (df = 5).

Figure 11

Fig. 9. (A) The relationship between crab number per pot and ln lobster number per pot (N = 2406 hauled pots from 176 strings), (B) the relationship between total number of by-catch species per pot and ln target species (crab and lobster) number per pot (N = 1068 hauled pots from 78 strings).

Figure 12

Table 4. Dominant substrate types of different sampling areas which were identified from image analysis and sediment particle size analysis (Modified from Hinz et al., 2010; White, 2011).

Supplementary material: File

Öndes et al supplementary material 1

Appendix

Download Öndes et al supplementary material 1(File)
File 15.1 KB