Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:55:08.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental influence on growth history in marine benthic foraminifera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

Caitlin R. Keating-Bitonti
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, U.S.A. E-mail: Keating-BitontiC@si.edu
Jonathan L. Payne
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, U.S.A. E-mail: Keating-BitontiC@si.edu

Abstract

Energy availability influences natural selection on the ontogenetic histories of organisms. However, it remains unclear whether physiological controls on size remain constant throughout ontogeny or instead shift as organisms grow larger. Benthic foraminifera provide an opportunity to quantify and interpret the physicochemical controls on both initial (proloculus) and adult volumes across broad environmental gradients using first principles of cell physiology. Here, we measured proloculus and adult test dimensions of 129 modern rotaliid species from published images of holotype specimens, using holotype size to represent the maximum size of all species’ occurrences across the North American continental margin. We merged size data with mean annual temperature, dissolved oxygen concentration, particulate organic carbon flux, and seawater calcite saturation for 718 unique localities to quantify the relationship between physicochemical variables and among-species adult/proloculus size ratios. We find that correlation of community mean adult/proloculus size ratios with environmental parameters reflects covariation of adult test volume with environmental conditions. Among-species proloculus sizes do not covary identifiably with environmental conditions, consistent with the expectation that environmental constraints on organism size impose stronger selective pressures on adult forms due to lower surface area-to-volume ratios at larger sizes. Among-species adult/proloculus size ratios of foraminifera occurring in resource-limited environments are constrained by the limiting resource in addition to temperature. Identified limiting resources are food in oligotrophic waters and oxygen in oxygen minimum zones. Because among-species variations in adult/proloculus size ratios from the North American continental margin are primarily driven by the local environment’s influence on adult sizes, the evolution of foraminiferal sizes over the Phanerozoic may have been strongly influenced by changing oceanographic conditions. Furthermore, lack of correspondence between among-species proloculus sizes and environmental conditions suggests that offspring sizes in foraminifera are rarely limited by physiological constraints and are more susceptible to selection related to other aspects of fitness.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2018 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Hypothesized relationships between local temperature and both log adult (solid) and proloculus (dashed) volumes (A), the adult/proloculus size ratio (B), and the resulting standard coefficient of log adult/proloculus size ratio (C). Hypothesized relationships between local oxygen, calcite saturation, and POC flux and both log adult and proloculus volumes (D), the adult/proloculus size ratio (E), and the resulting standard coefficient of log adult/proloculus size ratio (F). The predicted direction of association (standardized coefficient of the L1-regularized regression) between the four hypothesized environmental variables and log adult/proloculus size ratios shown in C and F are based on first principles of cell physiology.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Localities of Rotaliida foraminiferal occurrences that have accompanying adult/proloculus size ratios and data for all four hypothesized environmental variables. Points are transparent to show variations in the density of foraminiferal localities (i.e., darker points represent a higher density of localities). The largest sampling density of 52 occurrences occurs at 59.75°N, 144.92°W. The largest number of species at a locality (16 species) occurs at 11.00°N, 61.00°W, and at this site, the among-species adult test volumes range from (log10-transformed) −2.99 to −0.67 mm3 and proloculus volumes range from (log10-transformed) −5.97 to −3.43 mm3.

Figure 2

Figure 3 A comparison of test sizes for bulk sampled material relative to holotype specimens for Bolivina argentea and Uvigerina peregrina, illustrating that holotype specimens are similar in size to the largest specimens from the bulk samples. The holotype specimens were used in this study to approximate the sizes of the largest specimens, because locality-level data are not available for most species at most known localities. The test volumes for the bulk collection come from a previous study of foraminifera in the Santa Monica Basin (Keating-Bitonti and Payne 2016).

Figure 3

Table 1 The minimum, maximum, range, and median values of the four hypothesized environmental variables for each subgrouping of the North American continental margin. All data subgroups have similar environmental values and ranges except for Pacific oxygen minimum zones (OMZs), which have a narrower range of temperature, oxygen, and calcite saturation values.

Figure 4

Figure 4 Results of L1-regularized regression analysis assessing the correlations between environmental predictors and among-species log adult/proloculus size ratios for North American cosmopolitan species (A), endemic species from both the Atlantic and Pacific North American continental margin (B), Atlantic cosmopolitan species (C), Atlantic endemic species (D), Pacific cosmopolitan species (E), and Pacific endemic species (F). Bold black lines and text represent the environmental variables that comprise the best model for predicting variations in among-species log adult/proloculus size ratios based on AIC and BIC model selection criteria (see Table 2). Gray lines and text are environmental predictors not included in the best model. The numbers that lead the environmental predictors correspond to the order in which the predictor variables are added to the model. Dashed vertical lines point to the absolute sum of the coefficients of the environmental predictors that comprise the best-supported model, shown visually with bold lines and text. All data and lines that plot to the right of the dashed vertical line are new models introducing new variables and return to gray because these models are nonsignificant. For example, in D, temperature is the only environmental variable included the best-fit model. In E, dissolved oxygen is ranked the most important environmental predictor followed by temperature, and together these two environmental variables yield the best model for explaining variation the log adult/proloculus size ratios. See Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Table S1 for the individual regressions and statistics accompanying D.

Figure 5

Table 2 The order (i.e., step) of environmental variables added to the model to best predict the among-species distribution of log adult/proloculus size ratios for: cosmopolitan species on the North American Atlantic and Pacific continental margins (total and broken out by coast), endemic species on the North American Atlantic and Pacific continental margins (total and broken out by coast), and endemic species in Atlantic oligotrophic waters and Pacific OMZs. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) values are reported as the difference (∆) between the model in question and the model with the lowest reported value. Our model selection process considers both AIC and BIC values, and if two models yield similar values, we use the simpler model (i.e., the model with the fewer environmental predictor variables). Under the null model, all environmental predictors have zero regression coefficients (i.e., no trends between the environmental predictors and proloculus size). Figs. 4 and 5 illustrate the correlations between the environmental predictors and log adult/proloculus size ratios. POC flux, particulate organic carbon flux.

Figure 6

Figure 5 Results of L1-regularized regression analysis assessing the correlations between environmental predictors and among-species log adult/proloculus size ratios for species endemic to western Atlantic oligotrophic waters (A) and species endemic to eastern Pacific OMZs (B). Bold black lines and text illustrate the significant environmental variables that comprise the best model for predicting among-species log adult/proloculus size ratios based on AIC and BIC model selection criteria (see Table 2). Gray lines and text are environmental predictors that are nonsignificant and not included in the best model. The numbers that lead the environmental predictors correspond to the order in which the predictor variables are added to the model. Dashed vertical lines point to the absolute sum of the coefficients of the environmental predictors that comprise the best-supported model, shown visually with bold lines and text. All data and lines that plot to the right of the dashed vertical line are new models introducing new variables and return to gray because these models and their variables are nonsignificant.

Figure 7

Table 3 The order (i.e., step) of environmental variables added to the model to best predict the among-species distribution of proloculus volumes for: cosmopolitan species on the North American Atlantic and Pacific continental margins (total and broken out by coast), endemic species on the North American Atlantic and Pacific continental margins (total and broken out by coast), and endemic species in Atlantic oligotrophic waters and Pacific oxygen minimum zones (OMZs). The Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) values are reported as the difference (∆) between the model in question and the model with the lowest reported value. Our model selection process considers both AIC and BIC values, and if two models yield similar values, we use the simpler model (i.e., the model with the fewer environmental predictor variables). Under the null model, all environmental predictors have zero regression coefficients (i.e., no trends between the environmental predictors and proloculus size). Because we do not provide figures illustrating these model results, we give the direction of association between among-species log proloculus volumes and the four environmental predictor variables: + denotes a positive correlation; − denotes an inverse correlation. POC flux, particulate organic carbon flux.

Figure 8

Figure 6 The among-species distribution of log proloculus volumes (A), log adult test volumes (B), and log adult/proloculus size ratios (C) for North American cosmopolitan species and species endemic to the Atlantic and Pacific continental margins of North America. We further separated Atlantic endemics into species occurring in oligotrophic waters and Pacific endemic species into those occurring in OMZs. In B, the horizontal line with asterisk denotes a significant difference in the mean volumes between Atlantic and Pacific endemic species determined using an independent two-sample t-test (p<0.01). Box-plot whisker lengths represent 1.5×interquartile range.

Figure 9

Figure 7 Relationship between log proloculus versus adult test volumes per species for both cosmopolitan and endemic foraminifera from the North American continental margin. Gray points are measurements for single holotype specimens, and the solid line represents the slope from the standardized major axis regression for all North American species (m=0.59). The slopes for the standardized major axes for the Atlantic and Pacific endemics are 0.51 and 0.73, respectively (refer to Table 4).

Figure 10

Table 4 Summary of standardized major axis regressions for the relationship between proloculus and adult test volumes calculated for North American cosmopolitan species and species endemic to the Atlantic, Pacific, western Atlantic oligotrophic waters, and eastern Pacific oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in log10-log10 space. We also include the standardized major axis regression results for rotaliid foraminifera (modern and fossil representatives) reported by Caval-Holme et al. (2013). The slope and intercept ranges are reported as±95% confidence intervals.

Figure 11

Figure 8 The among-species distribution of log proloculus volumes (A), log adult test volumes (B), and log adult/proloculus size ratios (C) for species with no known evidence for an alternative metabolism (presumed aerobic) and species with traits (solid black circles) that are hypothesized to provide additional metabolic energy to foraminifera (Bolivina alata, B. argentea, B. seminude, Bulimina aculeate, Globobulimina auriculata, G. pacifica, and Uvigerina peregrina; see Supplementary Table S2). In A, the horizontal line with asterisk denotes a significant difference in the mean proloculus volumes of aerobic species versus species with known alternative metabolic strategies (p<0.05). The horizontal gray box in A represents the typical size of nitrate-storing vacuoles (0.005–0.015 mm), and the vertical arrow marks the large vacuole (0.05 mm) discovered in Nonionella stella (Bernhard et al. 2012a). Box-plot whisker lengths represent 1.5×interquartile range.