Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T20:34:03.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population dynamics of the amphioxus Branchiostoma elongatum from northern Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2011

Makarena Vergara
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad de Antofagasta, PO Box 170, Antofagasta, Chile
Marcelo E. Oliva
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad de Antofagasta, PO Box 170, Antofagasta, Chile
José M. Riascos*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad de Antofagasta, PO Box 170, Antofagasta, Chile
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: José M. Riascos, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad de Antofagasta, PO Box 170, Antofagasta, Chile email: jriascos@uantof.cl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Amphioxi represent the evolutionary link between vertebrates and invertebrates. For this reason, research dealing with these animals has been focused mainly on embryological and anatomical studies. Out of 30 described species, only one, Branchiostoma elongatum, is known to inhabit shallow sandy bottoms along the Humboldt Current System (HCS) of Chile and Peru. The population dynamics of B. elongatum from northern Chile was studied between February 2008 and January 2009, and the results were compared with other species within the genus Branchiostoma inhabiting distinct ecosystems. Mean abundance of B. elongatum was low (158.6 ind m−2) in comparison with the abundance of other species within Branchiostoma. Although the gametogenic activity was continuous, a clear spawning event was observed between August and October, which seemingly produced a recruitment pulse during the summer and consequently a simultaneous increase in population density and decrease of mean length during that period. Growth of B. elongatum was best fitted to the seasonalized von Bertalanffy growth function (K = 0.45 year−1 and L∞ = 64.6 mm), with faster growth during summer–autumn. Growth performance (Ф′ = 3.273) was high in comparison with other species within the genus. Mortality of B. elongatum (Z = 1.075 year−1) was well fitted to the single exponential model (r2 = 0.92). The annual total production of B. elongatum reached 0.68 g ash-free dry mass (AFDM) m−2 and the annual mean biomass was 0.56 g AFDM m−2, which determined a production to biomass ratio of 1.22. The huge productivity of the HCS was not reflected in a high abundance and biomass of B. elongatum. However, this species displayed a high growth efficiency and P/B ratio that are comparable to those of other Branchiostoma inhabiting highly productive ecosystems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the study site and location of sampling stations. Numbers denote water depth in metres of each sampling station.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Relationship between depth of sampling stations and the mean annual abundance of Branchiostoma elongatum in Coloso Port between February 2008 and January 2009.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Monthly variability of abundance, body length and gonad index of Branchiostoma elongatum and environmental variables at Coloso Port between February 2008 and January 2009: (A) fluctuations of mean abundance and body length; (B) changes in mean gonad index; and (C) changes in sea surface temperature and upwelling index. Vertical bars represent standard deviation.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Structured length–frequency distributions of Branchiostoma elongatum and fitting of growth curves according to the seasonalized von Bertalanffy growth function. Curves drawn represent individual cohorts identified by the statistical software FISAT.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Linear regression analysis to estimate mortality (Z) of Branchiostoma elongatum at Coloso Port, Antofagasta Bay, Chile.

Figure 5

Table 1. Parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth function (Equation 2) estimated from body length–frequency distributions of Branchiostoma elongatum.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Total annual production of Branchiostoma elongatum (empty dots) related to abundance among length-ranges pooled for a year (grey bars).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Mean abundance of Branchiostoma species along latitude.

Figure 8

Table 2. Comparison of mean population abundance among and within species in the genus Branchiostoma. NA, not available.

Figure 9

Table 3. Comparison of parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth function (K, L∞) and the growth perfomace index (Ф´) among distinct species of Branchiostoma.

Figure 10

Table 4. Comparison of annual total production, biomass and the P/B ratio of different species within the genus Branchiostoma.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Hypothetical model of the chronology of events of the reproductive cycle and its relationship with the recruitment process of Branchiostoma elongatum in Puerto Coloso, northern Chile.