Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T10:10:51.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of dynamic and quasistatic compressive mechanical properties of ice-templated alumina–epoxy composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

Sashanka Akurati
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA
Nicole Tennant
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA
Dipankar Ghosh*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: dghosh@odu.edu

Abstract

This study investigated the compressive response of ice-templated composites and provides an understanding of their mechanical behavior based on the properties of templated ceramic and epoxy. Results suggested a dependence of properties on the microstructure of the templated porous ceramic, whereas more interestingly composites exhibited catastrophic and progressive types of failure. Compressive strength was found to be markedly greater relative to the strength of templated ceramic and polymer, and irrespective of the failure type, strength was greatly enhanced under dynamic loading relative to quasistatic loading. Compressive strength was also calculated based on the rule of mixtures and mode of failure in ice-templated ceramic. The analysis suggested that the axial mode of failure was not dominant in composites, and failures resulted from the fracture of lamella walls, possibly due to elastic instability. Fragments of the composite specimens were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy to study the fracture characteristics and rationalize the catastrophic and progressive types of failure.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1: Representative SEM micrographs of ice-templated sintered porous Al2O3 materials that were processed at (a) 16.6 μm/s, (b) 20.2 μm/s, (c) 27.8 μm/s, and (d) 33.5 μm/s FFV, respectively. With the increase in FFV, the macropores retain elliptical pore morphology. However, significant decrease in pore major axis (a), pore minor axis (b), lamellae spacing (λ), and lamellae thickness (t) occurred with the increasing FFV, which can also be seen in (e) and (f) (ice growth direction below and above the page). High magnification SEM micrograph observed from (g) cross-section of porous Al2O3 (ice growth direction below and above the page) shows long slender dense ceramic lamella walls and (h) revealing the homogeneous dense polycrystalline microstructure in the lamella wall (ice growth parallel to the page).

Figure 1

TABLE I: Variation of pore characteristics in ice-templated porous Al2O3 materials as a function of FFV: major axis (a), minor axis (b), pore area (Ap), and aspect ratio (χp).

Figure 2

TABLE II: Variation of density and porosity of ice-templated porous Al2O3 materials and ice-templated Al2O3–epoxy composites as a function of FFV.

Figure 3

Figure 2: Uniaxial quasistatic compressive stress–strain response of ice-templated Al2O3–epoxy composites processed at average FFV of (a) 17 ± 1.0 μm/s, (b) 20.6 ± 0.6 μm/s, (c) 26.9 ± 1.2, and (d) 32.1 ± 1.3 μm/s. The numerical values shown in legend represent porosity (vol%) in composite. The compressive stress–strain curves shown in blue color correspond to progressive-type failure in composites, whereas the stress–strain curves shown in red color correspond to catastrophic-type failure in composites.

Figure 4

Figure 3: Variations of quasistatic compressive mechanical properties of ice-templated Al2O3–epoxy composites as a function of FFV: (a) stiffness and (b) strength. Variations in quasistatic compressive strength of composites with porosity of (c) ice-templated porous Al2O3 and (d) ice-templated Al2O3–epoxy composite.

Figure 5

Figure 4: (a) Representative uniaxial compressive stress–strain curves (up to 0.3 engineering strain) of ice-templated porous Al2O3 materials. (b) Variations of compressive strength and density of ice-templated porous Al2O3 materials with FFV. (c) Uniaxial compressive response of epoxy phase (up to 0.3 engineering strain).

Figure 6

Figure 5: (a) Compressive strength of ice-templated Al2O3 as a function of FFV; (b) peak stress of pure epoxy under compression; (c) calculated compressive strength of ice-templated composites based on the rule of mixtures, considering failure of ceramic walls due to bending/buckling induced elastic instability; (d) compressive strength of ice-templated composites as function of FFV, dotted line approximately separates the specimens that exhibited catastrophic-type failure (above the line) from the ones that exhibited progressive-type failure (below the line); (e) calculated compressive strength of ice-templated composites based on the rule of mixtures, considering failure of ceramic walls under pure compression.

Figure 7

Figure 6: Uniaxial dynamic (strain rate ≥102 s–1) compressive stress–strain response (up to 0.1 strain) of ice-templated composites processed at average FFV of (a) 16.9 ± 0.8 μm/s, (b) 20.8 ± 1.0 μm/s, (c) 26.6 ± 1.0, and (d) 32.2 ± 1.4 μm/s. The numerical values shown in legend represent porosity (vol%) in composite. The compressive stress–strain curves shown in blue color correspond to progressive-type failure in composites, whereas the stress–strain curves shown in red color correspond to catastrophic-type failure in composites.

Figure 8

Figure 7: (a) Comparison of dynamic and quasistatic compressive strength of ice-templated composites as a function of FFV. For each type of loading condition, the data shown in blue color correspond to progressive-type failure in composites, whereas the data shown in red color correspond to catastrophic-type failure in composites. (b) Representative dynamic compressive response of ice-templated porous Al2O3, epoxy, and ice-templated Al2O3–epoxy composites (corresponding to both catastrophic and progressive types of failure). (c) Quasistatic compressive stress–strain curves of ice-templated composites that exhibited progressive-type failure. Also, included stress–strain response of epoxy phase.

Figure 9

Figure 8: SEM images of ice-templated composite specimens that exhibited catastrophic-type failure (a–c) and progressive-type failure (d–f). All the images were taken from planes perpendicular to the compressive loading direction (ice growth direction below and above the page).