Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T01:17:20.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding mechanical behavior and reliability of organic electronic materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2017

Jae-Han Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea; jaehan.kim@kaist.ac.kr
Inhwa Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea; inhwa@kaist.ac.kr
Taek-Soo Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea; tskim1@kaist.ac.kr
Nicholas Rolston
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, USA; rolston@stanford.edu
Brian L. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, USA; brian.watson@stanford.edu
Reinhold H. Dauskardt
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, USA; dauskardt@stanford.edu

Abstract

The mechanical properties of organic electronic materials and interfaces play a central role in determining the manufacturability and reliability of flexible and stretchable organic electronic devices. The synergistic effects of mechanical stress and deformation, together with other operating parameters such as temperature and temperature cycling, and exposure to solar radiation, moisture, and other environmental species are particularly important for longer-term device stability. We review recent studies of basic mechanical properties such as adhesion and cohesion, stiffness, yield behavior, and ductility of organic semiconducting materials, and their connection to underlying molecular structure. We highlight thin-film metrologies to probe the mechanical behavior, including when subjected to simulated operational conditions. We also report on strategies for improving reliability through interface engineering and tailoring material chemistry and molecular structure. These studies provide insights into how these metrologies and metrics inform the development of materials and devices for improved reliability.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1. A comparison of Gc values for a wide range of active materials in organic electronic devices.1,10,13,14 The inset shows the double cantilever beam specimen method used to obtain the data in the plot.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Effects of environmental stressors on organic electronic device materials. (a) Micrographs of cracking in poly(3-heptylthiophene) (P3HpT) films under different strain cycling conditions at 90% strain (highest strain before failure of the substrates) showing the synergistic effects of strain and cycling on crack density in films. Reproduced with permission from Reference 24. © 2016 Elsevier. (b) Measured Gc as a function of annealing time modeled at different temperatures. The isothermal curves are integrated over the temperature profile of a thermal cycle and used to accurately predict effects of thermal cycling on Gc.12 (c) Illustration of a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) layer consisting of grains with a PEDOT-rich core and PSS-rich shell, showing the decohesion mechanism enabled by a stress-dependent chemical reaction between the water molecules and strained hydrogen bonds at the debond tip.11 (d) Debond growth rate curves at a constant temperature and varying moisture content (RH). The applied driving force at the debond tip, Gtip; the applied debond driving force, Ga; the threshold driving force, Gth; and the intrinsic resistance to bond rupture in the reactive environment, 2γ.11

Figure 2

Figure 3. The synergistic influence of concentrated outdoor sunlight exposure or laboratory UV exposure with temperature on the adhesion of a highly transparent silicone adhesive layer to an antireflective Al2O3 layer. Initially, the layered structure failed adhesively. With increasing exposure, adhesion increased until failure occurred cohesively; at which point UV exposure resulted in further embrittlement of the silicone adhesive. Insets (moving clockwise from top left show) the outdoor concentrator optics allowing for exposure with 1100× solar concentration onto a 1 cm2 target (black curve), UV exposure of silicone specimens under investigation in an indoor environmental chamber at 50°C, 80°C, or 110°C at 10% relative humidity (blue, green, and red curves, respectively), and specimens aged under the outdoor concentrator showing formation and growth of cracks through 4400 h of concentrated solar irradiation, similar to those observed for specimens aged in laboratory conditions.29

Figure 3

Figure 4. Strategies to improve the fracture energy Gc of organic electronic materials. (a) Atomic force microscope images of fractured poly(3-hexylthiophene) [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (P3HT:PCBM) surfaces showing an increase in roughness with increasing molecular weight. (b) Measured Gc of P3HT:PCBM for various molecular weights and bulk heterojunction (BHJ) layer thicknesses, showing a strong dependence of cohesion on both of these variables. Inset schematic shows the larger plastic zone at the crack tip generated for the higher-molecular-weight (MW) BHJ layer. Gc is the sum of the intrinsic energy required to debond the interface, G0, and the energy contributed to the plasticity, Gplasticity.4 (c) Fracture energies measured at the interface between perovskite and spiro-OMeTAD layers with and without polyethyleneimine (PEI) specimens.37 (d) Adhesion promotion of an oxide–polymer interface by nanopatterning of SiO2 on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), showing the effect of varying feature diameter (2R) on adhesion energy, which increases Gc due to a larger fraction of pillars pulled out.38

Figure 4

Figure 5. Improvements via cross-linking. (a) The flexible substituent of 1-(p-phenoxy-(p-methylvinylbenzene)-indolino[2,3][60]fullerene (MPMIC60) is designed to increase van der Waals interactions in the solid state. (b) Cured films of MPMIC60, [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM), and C60 fullerenes after dipping in 1,2-dichlorobenzene. The reactive styrene units of MPMIC60 enable transformation of MPMIC60 into a film resistant to dissolution. (c) MPMIC60 shows marked improvements in cohesion energy over C60 and PCBM fullerene in both cured and uncured states. (d) Perovskite solar cells utilizing MPMIC60 exhibited increased open-circuit voltage (VOC) and short-circuit current (JSC) over C60 controls.14 Note: spiro-OMeTAD, spirobifluorene; ITO, indium tin oxide.